Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Critical Role of Racial/Ethnic Data Disaggregation for Health Equity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population-level health outcomes and measures of well-being are often described relative to broad racial/ethnic categories such as White or Caucasian; Black or African American; Latino or Hispanic; Asian American; Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander; or American Indian and Alaska Native. However, the aggregation of data into these groups masks critical within-group differences and disparities, limiting the health and social services fields’ abilities to target their resources where most needed. While researchers and policymakers have recognized the importance of disaggregating racial/ethnic data—and many organizations have advocated for it over the years—progress has been slow and disparate. The ongoing lack of racial/ethnic data disaggregation perpetuates existing inequities in access to much-needed resources that can ensure health and well-being. In its efforts to help build a Culture of Health and promote health equity, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has supported activities aimed to advance the meaningful disaggregation of racial/ethnic data—at the collection, analysis, and reporting phases. This special issue presents further evidence for the importance of disaggregation, the technical and policy challenges to creating change in practice, and the implications of improving the use of race and ethnicity data to identify and address gaps in health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the OMB guidelines separates Asian Americans from Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, many data sources often aggregate them into a single group.

  2. Data inequity does not only come in the form of race and ethnicity. The needs of populations based on other demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, sexual orientation, and disability) often similarly lack equitable representation in data to inform policy and resource allocation decisions.

References

Download references

Funding

Funding was supported by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina J. Kauh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kauh, T.J., Read, J.G. & Scheitler, A.J. The Critical Role of Racial/Ethnic Data Disaggregation for Health Equity. Popul Res Policy Rev 40, 1–7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09631-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09631-6

Keywords