Abstract
Population-level health outcomes and measures of well-being are often described relative to broad racial/ethnic categories such as White or Caucasian; Black or African American; Latino or Hispanic; Asian American; Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander; or American Indian and Alaska Native. However, the aggregation of data into these groups masks critical within-group differences and disparities, limiting the health and social services fields’ abilities to target their resources where most needed. While researchers and policymakers have recognized the importance of disaggregating racial/ethnic data—and many organizations have advocated for it over the years—progress has been slow and disparate. The ongoing lack of racial/ethnic data disaggregation perpetuates existing inequities in access to much-needed resources that can ensure health and well-being. In its efforts to help build a Culture of Health and promote health equity, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has supported activities aimed to advance the meaningful disaggregation of racial/ethnic data—at the collection, analysis, and reporting phases. This special issue presents further evidence for the importance of disaggregation, the technical and policy challenges to creating change in practice, and the implications of improving the use of race and ethnicity data to identify and address gaps in health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although the OMB guidelines separates Asian Americans from Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, many data sources often aggregate them into a single group.
Data inequity does not only come in the form of race and ethnicity. The needs of populations based on other demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, sexual orientation, and disability) often similarly lack equitable representation in data to inform policy and resource allocation decisions.
References
AHRQ. (2018). Race, ethnicity, and language data: Standardization for health care quality improvement, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved November 4, 2020 from www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/iomracereport/index.html.
Akee, R., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2017). Race matters: Income shares, income inequality, and income mobility for all U.S. races. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23733.
Braveman, P., Arkin, E., Orleans, T., Proctor, D., & Plough, A. (2017). "What Is Health Equity?": Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved November 4, 2020 from www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2017/05/what-is-health-equity-.html.
Kochhar, R., & Cilluffo, A. (2018). Income inequality in the U.S. is rising most rapidly among Asians, Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved November 4, 2020, from www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/07/12/income-inequality-in-the-u-s-is-rising-most-rapidly-among-asians/.
OMB. n.d., Office of Management and Budget (Omb) Standards, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved November 4, 2020 from https://orwh.od.nih.gov/toolkit/other-relevant-federal-policies/OMB-standards.
PolicyLink. (2020). Making the case for data disaggregation to advance a culture of health: PolicyLink. Retrieved November 4, 2020 from www.policylink.org/our-work/community/health-equity/data-disaggregation.
RWJF. (2020). About a Culture of Health: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved November 4, 2020 from www.rwjf.org/en/cultureofhealth/about.html.
The Atlantic. (2020). The Covid Tracking Project: The Atlantic Monthly Group. Retrieved November 4, 2020 from https://covidtracking.com/.
Funding
Funding was supported by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kauh, T.J., Read, J.G. & Scheitler, A.J. The Critical Role of Racial/Ethnic Data Disaggregation for Health Equity. Popul Res Policy Rev 40, 1–7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09631-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09631-6

