Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 327–350

A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link Between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11113-016-9390-4

Cite this article as:
Tan, P.L., Morgan, S.P. & Zagheni, E. Popul Res Policy Rev (2016) 35: 327. doi:10.1007/s11113-016-9390-4

Abstract

Household spending on children’s pre-tertiary education is exceptionally high in Japan and South Korea, and has been cited as a cause of low fertility. Previous research attributes this high spending to a cultural emphasis on education in East Asian countries. In this paper, we argue that institutional factors, namely higher education and labor market systems, play an important role in reinforcing the pressure on parents to invest in their children’s education. We review evidence showing that graduating from a prestigious university has very high economic and social returns in Japan and South Korea, and examine the implications for fertility within the framework of quantity–quality models. Finally, we put forward ‘reverse one-child’ policies that directly address the unintended consequences of these institutional factors on fertility. These policies have the additional virtues of having very low fiscal requirements and reducing social inequality.

Keywords

Lowest-low fertility Japan South Korea Education Quantity–quality model Policy 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Poh Lin Tan
    • 1
  • S. Philip Morgan
    • 2
  • Emilio Zagheni
    • 3
  1. 1.Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of Washington at SeattleSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations