Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 327–350 | Cite as

A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link Between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility

  • Poh Lin TanEmail author
  • S. Philip Morgan
  • Emilio Zagheni


Household spending on children’s pre-tertiary education is exceptionally high in Japan and South Korea, and has been cited as a cause of low fertility. Previous research attributes this high spending to a cultural emphasis on education in East Asian countries. In this paper, we argue that institutional factors, namely higher education and labor market systems, play an important role in reinforcing the pressure on parents to invest in their children’s education. We review evidence showing that graduating from a prestigious university has very high economic and social returns in Japan and South Korea, and examine the implications for fertility within the framework of quantity–quality models. Finally, we put forward ‘reverse one-child’ policies that directly address the unintended consequences of these institutional factors on fertility. These policies have the additional virtues of having very low fiscal requirements and reducing social inequality.


Lowest-low fertility Japan South Korea Education Quantity–quality model Policy 


  1. Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2001). Job bust, baby bust? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. M., & Kohler, H.-P. (2013). Education fever and the east asian fertility puzzle: A case study of the low fertility in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 9(2), 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1976). Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 84(4), S143–S162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, D. A., & Smith, J. A. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implication for policy makers in Asia. Asian Development Bank CERC Monograph Series in Comparative and International Education and Development No. 9.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, S. J. (2008). A cultural and philosophical perspective on Korea’s education reform: A critical way to maintain Korea’s economic momentum. Korea Economic Institute Academic Paper Series No. 3(2)Google Scholar
  8. Cho, J., & Kwon, T. (2010). Affirmative action and corporate compliance in South Korea. Feminist Economics, 16(2), 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung, B. G. (2002). Korea’s war on private tutoring. Cheongju: The Korea National University of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Chung, Y. S., & Choe, M. K. (2001). Sources of family income and expenditure on children’s private, after-school education in Korea. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(3), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (1999). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college quality: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. NBER Working Paper No. 7322.Google Scholar
  12. Dalla Zuanna, G. (2007). Social mobility and fertility. Demographic Research, 17(15), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 14–24.Google Scholar
  14. Del Boca, D. (2003). Why are fertility and participation rates so low in Italy (and Southern Europe)? Italian Academy for Advanced Studies Working Paper.Google Scholar
  15. Ellington, L. (2005). Japanese education. Japan digest, national clearinghouse for United States—Japan Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2005). Private household spending on education and training. Final Project Report.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1996). The winner-take-all society: Why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Greenhalgh, S. (1988). Fertility as mobility: Sinic transitions. Population and Development Review, 14(4), 629–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hotz, V. J., Klerman, J. A., & Willis, R. J. (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries. In M. R. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics. Philadelphia: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  20. Hwang, Y. (2001). Why do South Korean students study hard? Reflections on Paik’s Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 609–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jang, S. (2011). The effects of after-school programs on students’ achievement and shadow education expenditures. PhD thesis, Department of Education, Graduate School of Seoul National University.Google Scholar
  22. Kang, C. (2007). Does money matter? The effect of private educational expenditures on academic performance. NUS Department of Economics Working Paper No. 0704.Google Scholar
  23. Kariya, T., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (1999). Bright flight: Unintended consequences of detracking policy in Japan. American Journal of Education, 107(3), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katsuki, N. (1988). The learning business. Tokyo Business Today, (January), 34–36.Google Scholar
  25. KEDI (Korea Education Development Institute). (1999). Sakyoyukui siltae josa [Surveyon private tutoring]. Seoul: KEDI.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, S., & Lee, J.-H. (2002). The secondary school equalization policy in South Korea. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, S., & Lee, J.-H. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. KNSO (Korea National Statistical Office). (2011). The 2010 survey of private education expenditure. Seoul: Korea National Statistical Office.
  29. Koh, B. C. (1989). Chapters 4–5. Japan’s administrative elite. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  30. Korean Ministry of Education. (2013). Higher education. Cited January 24, 2014.
  31. Lee, S. K. (2012). Local perspectives of korean shadow education. Reconsidering Development and the Local, 2(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, S., & Brinton, M. C. (1996). Elite education and social capital: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 69(3), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, M., & Larson, R. (2000). The Korean ‘Examination Hell’: Long hours of studying, distress and depression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2010). Some macroeconomics aspects of global population aging. Demography, 47(Supplement), 8151–8172.Google Scholar
  35. Liu, J. (2012). Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamura, T. (2003). Educational aspirations and the warming-up/cooling-down process: A comparative study between Japan and South Korea. Social Science Japan Journal, 6(2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nam, K. (2007). Sakyoyukbi kyumoei sikyeol choyi Bunseok [Time-series analysis of the scale of private supplementary tutoring]. Kyoyuk Jaejeong Kyongjie Yeonku [Economic study of educational finance], 16(1), 57–79.Google Scholar
  39. Nishioka, H., Suzuki, T., Yamauchi, M., & Suga, K. (2011). Household projections for Japan: 2005–2030. Outline of methods and results. Japanese Journal of Population, 9(1), 40–77.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (2007). Education at a glance. In OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. OECD. (2011). Education reform in Japan. In OECD economic surveys: Japan 2011. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. OECD. (2012a). OECD family database. Paris: OECD.
  43. OECD. (2012b). Promoting social cohesion in Korea. In OECD economic surveys: Korea 2012. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Ogawa, N., Mason, A., Chawla, A., Matsukura, R., & Tung, A.-C. (2009). Declining fertility and the rising cost of children. Asian Population Studies, 5(3), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Okada, A. (1999). Secondary education reform and the concept of equality of opportunity in Japan. Compare, 29(2), 171–189.Google Scholar
  46. Ono, H. (2001). Who goes to college? Features of institutional tracking in Japanese higher education. American Journal of Education, 109(2), 161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ono, H. (2004). College quality and earnings in the Japanese labor market. Industrial Relations, 43(3), 595–617.Google Scholar
  48. Sautman, B. (1998). Affirmative action, ethnic minorities and china’s Universities. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 7(1), 77–116.Google Scholar
  49. Sorensen, C. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(1), 10–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suzuki, T. (2008). Korea’s strong familism and lowest-low fertility. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 17, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Takeuchi, Y. (1991). Myth and reality in the Japanese educational selection system. Compare, 27(1), 101–112.Google Scholar
  53. Tsuya, N. O., & Choe, M. K. (2004). Investments in children’s education, desired fertility and women’s employment. In N. O. Tsuya & L. L. Bumpass (Eds.), Marriage, work, and family life in comparative perspective: Japan, South Korea, and the United States (pp. 76–94). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  54. Van der Velden, R., van der Loo, P., & Meng, C. (2007). Chapter 4: University and college differences in the returns to education in Japan and the Netherlands. In J. Allen et al. (Eds.), Competencies, higher education and career in Japan and the Netherlands. Higher education dynamics, vol. 21 (pp. 77–95).Google Scholar
  55. World Bank. (2013). Household Final consumption expenditure, etc. (% of GDP). Cited on January 4, 2014.
  56. Yoon, J. I., Huh, T. J., Lee, B. G., Hong, S. P., Kim, J. R., Kim, D. Y., Kang, T. H., & Kim, E. O. (1997). Research on the actual condition of extracurricular lessons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Poh Lin Tan
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Philip Morgan
    • 2
  • Emilio Zagheni
    • 3
  1. 1.Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of Washington at SeattleSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations