Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 201–221 | Cite as

Population Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case of Both Normative and Coercive Ties to the World Polity

  • Rachel Sullivan RobinsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

During the 1980s and 1990s, two-thirds of sub-Saharan African countries adopted national population policies to reduce population growth. Based on multivariate statistical analysis, I show that countries with more ties to the world polity were more likely to adopt population policies. In order to refine world polity theory, however, I distinguish between normative and coercive ties to the world polity. I show that ties to the world polity via international nongovernmental organizations became predictive of population policy adoption only after the 1994 United Nations International Conference on Population and Development institutionalized reproductive health as a global norm to which countries could show adherence through population policies. Ties to the World Bank in the form of indebtedness, presumed to be coercive, were associated with population policy adoption throughout the time period observed. Gross domestic product per capita, democracy, and religion also all predicted population policy adoption. The case of population policy adoption in sub-Saharan Africa thus demonstrates that ties to organizations likely to exert normative pressure are most influential when something about international norms is at stake, while ties to organizations with coercive capacity matter regardless of time, but may be easier for wealthier countries to resist.

Keywords

Population policy Sub-Saharan Africa Institutionalism International Conference on Population and Development International nongovernmental organizations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship as well as a Faculty Research Award from American University. It greatly benefitted from feedback from the Berkeley Center for Culture, Organization, and Politics workshop, the Berkeley Department of Demography Brown Bag Series, and the session on cross-national sociology at the 2006 American Sociological Association meeting.  I am particularly indebted to the suggestions of the anonymous reviewers from PRPR.  I thank Yolande Bouka, Dorothy Fort, Barbara Lukunka, Katie Rice, Jennifer Vanderburgh and Yang Zhang for their research assistance.  I also gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful comments of Deborah Barrett, Neil Fligstein, David John Frank, Shannon Gleason, Gene Hammel, Jennifer Johnson-Hanks, Kate Haulman, Charles Kurzman, Adrea Lawrence, Damon Mayrl, Benjamin Moodie, Aliya Saperstein, Evan Schofer, Susan Shepler, Sarah Staveteig, Ann Swidler, Bryan Sykes, Sarah Walchuk Thayer, Sarah Tom, Kenneth Wachter, Susan Watkins, Brenda Werth, Elizabeth Worden, and Danzhen You.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? norm localization and institutional change in asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S., Li, Q., Liu, L., & Tsui, A. O. (2012). Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: An analysis of 172 countries. The Lancet, 380(9837), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, D. (1995). Reproducing Persons as a Global Concern: The Making of an Institution. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, D., & Frank, D. J. (1999). Population control for national development: From world discourse to national policies. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875 (pp. 198–221). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, D., Kurzman, C., & Shanahan, S. (2010). For export only: Diffusion professionals and population policy. Social Forces, 88(3), 1183–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett, D., & Tsui, A. O. (1999). Policy as symbolic statement: International response to national population policies. Social Forces, 78(1), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayart, J. F. (2000). Africa in the World: A history of extraversion. African Affairs, 99, 217–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckfield, J. (2008). The dual world polity: Fragmentation and integration in the network of intergovernmental organizations. Social Problems, 55(3), 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beckfield, J. (2010). The social structure of the world polity. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1018–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boli, J. (1987). Human rights or state expansion? Cross-national definitions of constitutional rights, 1870–1970. In G. M. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 71–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review, 62, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Political regimes and regime transitions in Africa, 19101994 [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
  14. Bryceson, D. F. (2012). Discovery and denial: Social science theory and interdisciplinarity in African Studies. African Affairs, 111(443), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caldwell, J. C., & Sai, F. T. (2007). Family planning in Ghana. In W. C. Robinson & J. A. Ross (Eds.), The global family planning revolution (pp. 379–391). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Chamie, J. (1994). Trends, variations, and contradictions in national policies to influence fertility. Population and Development Review, 20, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chimbwete, C., Watkins, S. C., & Zulu, E. M. (2005). The evolution of population policies in Kenya and Malawi. Population Research and Policy Review, 24(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clapham, C. S. (1996). Africa and the international system: The politics of state survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cleland, J., Bernstein, S., Ezeh, A., Faundes, A., Glasier, A., & Innis, J. (2006). Family planning: The unfinished agenda. The Lancet, 368(9549), 1810–1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connelly, M. (2006). Population control in India: Prologue to the emergency period. Population and Development Review, 32(4), 629–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Demeny, P. (2011). Population policy and the demographic transition: Performance, prospects, and options. Population and Development Review, 37, 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eager, P. W. (2004). Global population policy: From population control to reproductive rights. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. Fair, M. (2008). From population lending to HNP results: The evolution of the World Bank’s strategies in health, nutrition and population. In IEG Working Paper 2008/2003. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. Findlay, A. M., & Borgegard, L.-E. (1995). Demography, destiny and population policies. Applied Geography, 15(3), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fourcade-Gourinchas, M., & Babb, S. L. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in Four Countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The Nation-State and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank, O., & McNicoll, G. (1987). An interpretation of fertility and population Policy in Kenya. Population and Development Review, 13(2), 209–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbon, P. (1992). Population and poverty in the changing ideology of the world bank. In M. Hammarskjold, B. Egero, & S. Lindberg (Eds.), Population and the Development Crisis in the South (pp. 133–145). Bastad, Sweden: Programme on Population and Development in Poor Countries.Google Scholar
  29. Government of Malawi. (2012). National Population Policy. Lilongwe: Ministry of Economic Planning and Development.Google Scholar
  30. Government of Mali. (1991). Declaration of the National Population Policy of Mali Bamako: Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation, National Planning Directorate.Google Scholar
  31. Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harbom, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2009). Armed conflict, 1946–2008. Journal of Peace Research, 46(4), 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartmann, B. (1995). Reproductive rights and wrongs. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  34. Harvard School of Public Health. (1988–1996/1997). Annual review of population law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health.Google Scholar
  35. Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A., & Guillen, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodgson, D., & Watkins, S. C. (1997). Feminists and neo-Malthusians: Past and present alliances. Population and Development Review, 23(3), 469–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes, M. M., Peterson, L., Harrison, J. A., & Paxton, P. (2009). Power and relation in the world polity: The INGO Network Country Score, 1978–1998. Social Forces, 87(4), 1711–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lacey, L. (1990). The new generation of African population policies. In G. Roberts (Ed.), The role of the world bank in shaping third world population policy (pp. 135–146). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  39. Liagin, E. (1996). Excessive force: Power, politics, and population control. Washington, DC: Information Project for Africa Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Locoh, T., & Makdessi, Y. (1996). Population policies and fertility decline in sub-Saharan Africa (F. M. Moursund, Trans.). Paris: Centre Français sur la Population et le Développement.Google Scholar
  41. Mabogunje, A. L., & Arowolo, O. (1978). Social science research on population and development in Africa South of the Sahara. Mexico City: International Review Group of Social Science Research on Population and Development.Google Scholar
  42. Macpherson, J. M. (2006). Palace wars and privatization: Did Chicago Beat Cambridge in influencing economic policies. European Management Review, 3, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Macpherson, J. M., & Weymouth, S. (2012). The social construction of policy reform: Economists and trade liberalization around the world. International Interactions, 38(5), 670–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R., & Jaggers, K. (2010). Polity IV project dataset users’ manual. Severn, MD: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
  45. Matisoff, D. C. (2008). The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants? Review of Policy Research, 25(6), 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. May, J. F. (2012). World population policies: Their origin, evolution, and impact. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntosh, C. A., & Finkle, J. L. (1995). The Cairo conference on population and development: A new paradigm? Population and Development Review, 21(2), 223–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meyer, J. W. (2004). The Nation as Babbit: How countries conform. Contexts, 3(3), 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘Actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Rubinson, R., & Boli-Bennett, J. (1977). The World Educational revolution, 1950–1970. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Soysal, Y. N. (1992). World expansion of mass education, 1870–1980. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 128–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mosley, H. H., & Branic, G. (1989). Population policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Agendas of International Agencies. In Population Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Drawing on International Experience (pp. 463–506). Liege, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  55. Nassim, J., & Sai, F. T. (1990). Family planning and maternal and child health in the World Bank’s population, health, and nutrition program. In H. M. Wallace & G. Kanti (Eds.), Health care for women and children in developing countries. Oakland, CA: Third Party Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nathanson, C. A. (1996). Disease prevention as social change: Toward a theory of public health. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 609–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Population Reference Bureau. (2013). 2013 World Population Data Sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  58. Ramirez, F. O., Soysal, Y., & Shanahan, S. (1997). The changing logic of political citizenship: Cross-national acquisition of women’s suffrage rights, 1890 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Republic of Benin. (1996). Declaration of the population Policy of the Republic of Benin. Porto-Novo: Ministry of Economic Restructuring and of Employment Promotion.Google Scholar
  60. Republic of Botswana. (1997). National Population Policy. Gabarone: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  61. Republic of Cameroon. (1993). Declaration of National Population Policy. Yaounde: National Population Commission.Google Scholar
  62. Republic of Ghana. (1994). National Population Policy (Revised). Accra: National Population Commission.Google Scholar
  63. Republic of Kenya. (2012). Sessional Paper No. 3 of 2012 on Population Policy for National Development. Nairobi: National Council for Population and Development.Google Scholar
  64. Republic of Liberia. (1988). National policy on population for social and economic development. Monrovia: National Population Commission.Google Scholar
  65. Republic of The Gambia. (1992). National population policy for socio-economic development. Banjul: National Population Commission.Google Scholar
  66. Richey, L. A. (1999). Family planning and the politics of population in Tanzania: International to local discourse. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(3), 457–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Richey, L. A. (2003). Women’s reproductive health and population policy: Tanzania. Review of African Political Economy, 30(96), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Richey, L. A. (2008). Population politics and development: From the policies to the clinics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Robinson, R. S. (2012). Negotiating development prescriptions: The case of population policy in Nigeria. Population Research and Policy Review, 31(2), 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sadik, N. (Ed.). (1991). Population policies and programmes: Lessons learned from two decades of experience. New York: United Nations Population Fund.Google Scholar
  71. Sai, F. T., & Chester, L. A. (1990). The role of the World Bank in shaping Third world population policy. In G. Roberts (Ed.), Population policy: Contemporary issues (pp. 179–191). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  72. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 195–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shiffman, J., & Quissell, K. (2012). Family planning: A political issue. Lancet, 380(9837), 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sinding, S. W. (1991). Strengthening the Bank’s Population Work in the Nineties Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, DC: Population and Human Resources Department The World Bank.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, J., & Wiest, D. (2005). The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces, 84(2), 621–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thomas, J. W., & Grindle, M. S. (1994). Political leadership and policy characteristics in population policy reform. [Article]. Population and Development Review, 20, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thornton, A., Binstock, G., Yount, K., Abbasi-Shavazi, M., Ghimire, D., & Xie, Y. (2012). International fertility change: New data and insights from the developmental idealism framework. Demography, 49(2), 677–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Union of International Associations. (1985/1986–2005/2006). Yearbook of International Organizations. Brussels: Union of International Associations.Google Scholar
  82. United Nations (1995) Report of the International Conference on Population and Development. Cairo: United Nations.Google Scholar
  83. United Nations. (2007). World Population Policies. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  84. United Nations. (2011). 2010 Revision of World Population Prospects. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  85. United Nations Population Fund, & Population Reference Bureau. (2003). Country Profiles for Population and Reproductive Health: Policy Developments and Indicators 2003: UNFPA and Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  86. United Nations Population Fund, & Population Reference Bureau. (2005). Country Profiles for Population and Reproductive Health: Policy Developments and Indicators 2005: UNFPA and Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  87. Warwick, D. P. (1982). Bitter Pills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S. (2005). Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. World Bank. (1991). National Population Project between Federal Republic of Nigeria and International Development Association Retrieved 11 June 2008, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000114496_2004090121020411.
  90. World Bank. (1992). Population and the World Bank: Implications from Eight Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  91. World Bank. (2009). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  92. World Health Organization. (2012). Health Topics: Reproductive Health Retrieved 9 August 2012, 2012, from http://www.who.int/topics/reproductive_health/en/.
  93. Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International ServiceAmerican UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations