Abstract
Cohabitation continues to rise, but there is a lack of knowledge about expectations to cohabit and the linkage between expectations and subsequent cohabitation. We capitalize on a new opportunity to study cohabitation expectations by drawing on the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY79) main youth and two waves (2008 and 2010) of the NLSY young adult (YA) surveys (n = 1,105). We find considerable variation in cohabitation expectations: 39.9 % have no expectation of cohabiting in the future and 16.6 % report high odds of cohabiting in the next 2 years. Cohabitation expectations are associated with higher odds of entering a cohabiting relationship, but are not perfectly associated. Only 38 % of YAs with certain cohabitation expectations in 2008 entered a cohabiting union by 2010. Further investigation of the mismatch between expectations and behaviors indicates that a substantial minority (30 %) who entered a cohabiting union had previously reported no or low expectations, instances of what we term “unplanned cohabitation.” Our findings underscore the importance of considering not only just behavior but also individuals’ expectations for understanding union formation, and more broadly, family change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I., & Koblas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232.
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children, and cohabitation: The intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 233–246.
Barber, J. S. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Considering drives, proximity and dynamics. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 31–35.
Bogle, R. H., & Wu, H. S. (2010). Thirty years of change in marriage and union formation attitudes, 1976–2008 (Family Profile-10-03). Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research.
Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 833–846.
Bulcroft, R. A., & Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(2), 338–355.
Bumpass, L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27(4), 483–498.
Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41(2), 237–261.
Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitaiton. Social Science Research, 39(5), 766–776.
Copen, C., Daniels, K., & Mosher, W. (2013). First premarital cohabitation in the United States: 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 64. Hyattsville, MD.
Crissey, S. R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 697–709.
DeMaris, A. (2004). Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited response variables (vol. 417). Wiley.
Eggebeen, D., & Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 108–121.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Freedman, R., Coombs, L. C., & Bumpass, L. L. (1965). Stability and change in expectations about family size. Demography, 2, 250–275.
Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301–1312.
Guzzo, K. B. (2006a). The relationship between life course events and union formation. Social Science Research, 35(2), 384–408.
Guzzo, K. B. (2006b). How do marriage market conditions affect entrance into cohabitation vs. marriage? Social Science Research, 35(2), 332–355.
Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 179–205.
Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 507–527.
Halpern-Meekin, S. (2012). Unlikely optimists, skeptics, and believers: Understanding adolescents’ prospective relationship views. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(5), 606–631.
Hayford, S. R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography, 46(4), 765–783.
Huang, P. M., Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Bergstrom-Lynch, C. (2011). He says, she says: Gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 876–905.
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2011). Cohabitation and trends in the structure and stability of children’s family lives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.
Kiser, C. V. (1967). The growth of American families studies: An assessment of significance. Demography, 4(1), 388–396.
Landale, N. S., Schoen, R., & Daniels, K. (2010). Early family formation among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Family Issues, 31(4), 445–474.
Lehrer, E. (2004). The role of religion in union formation: An economic perspective. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(2), 161–185.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United State: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32(4), 669–698.
Licther, L., Batson, C., & Brown, J. (2004). Marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1), 2–25.
Liefbroer, A. (2011). On the usefulness of the theory of planned behaviour for fertility research. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 55–62.
Liefbroer, A., Gerritsen, L., & Gireveld, J. (1994). The influence of intentions and life course factors on union formation behavior of young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56(1), 193–203.
Manning, W. D. (2013). Trends in cohabitation: Twenty years of change, 1987–2008 (Family Profile-13-12). Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research.
Manning, W. D., Cohen, J. A., & Smock, P. J. (2011). The role of romantic partners, family, and peer networks in dating couples’ views about cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26(1), 115–149.
Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 559–575.
Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 989–1002.
Manning, W. D., Trella, D., Lyons, H., & Du Toit, N. C. (2010). Marriageable women: A focus on participants in a community healthy marriage program. Family Relations, 59(1), 87–102.
McLanahan, S. S., & Sandefur, G. D. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Miller, W. B., & Pasta, D. (1995). Behavioral intentions: Which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 530–555.
Morgan, S. P., & Bachrach, C. (2011). Is the theory of planned behavior an important model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 11–18.
Morgan, S. P., & Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 91–118.
Oppenheimer, V. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career development process. Demography, 40(1), 127–149.
Pearce, L. D., & Thornton, A. (2007). Religious identity and family ideologies in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1227–1243.
Philipov, D. (2011). Theories on fertility intentions: A demographer’s perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 37–45.
Raley, R., Crissey, S., & Muller, C. (2007). Of sex and romance: Late adolescent relationships and young adult union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1210–1226.
Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512.
Ryan, S., Franzetta, K., Schelar, E., & Manlove, J. (2009). Family structure history: Links to relationship formation behaviors in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 935–953.
Sassler, S., Cunningham, A., & Lichter, D. T. (2009). Intergenerational patterns of union formation and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(6), 757–786.
Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 147–159.
Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., & Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect behavior? Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 790–799.
Schoen, R., Landale, N., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44(4), 807–820.
Scott, M. E., Schelar, E., Manlove, J., & Cui, C. (2009). Young adult attitudes about relationships and marriage: Times may have changed, but expectations remain high. (Research Brief). Washington, DC: Child Trends.
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 1–20.
Smock, P. J., & Greenland, F. (2010). Diversity in pathways to parenthood: Patterns, implications, and emerging research directions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 576–593.
Smock, P. J., & Manning, W. D. (1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34(3), 331–341.
South, S. J. (1993). Racial and ethnic differences in the desire to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(2), 357–370.
Stewart, S., Manning, W., & Smock, P. (2003). Union formation among men in the U.S.: Does having prior children matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 90–104.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W., & Teachman, J. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 762–774.
Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1009–1037.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (2011) Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. In Families and Living Arrangements: Marital Status. Retrieved August 31, 2012 from http://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/marital.html.
Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 53–67.
Whelpton, P. K., Campbell, A. A., & Patterson, J. E. (1966). Fertility and family planning in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zito, R. C. (2013). Family structure history and teenage cohabitation: Instability, socioeconomic disadvantage or transmission? Journal of Family Issues,. doi:10.1177/0192513X13490933.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manning, W.D., Smock, P.J., Dorius, C. et al. Cohabitation Expectations Among Young Adults in the United States: Do They Match Behavior?. Popul Res Policy Rev 33, 287–305 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9316-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9316-3