Abstract
Our paper focuses on the realization of fertility intentions, exploring a new aspect of the post-communist fertility transition. By making use of a follow-up study, it was possible to compare five European countries and to analyze the chances of realizing short-term, time-dependent fertility intentions. There is always a difference between intention and behavior. It is partly due to demographic and social factors, such as age, parity, partnership status, but once these are accounted for, important differences remain between western European and post-communist countries. In the period after the turn of the millennium, chances of realizing intentions are significantly lower in post-communist countries than in western European countries. The lower chance of realization is a consequence of social anomie originating from discrepancy between slow value shift and the increased dynamism of structural changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
In Srole’s anomie scale from the 1950s, the questioning of childbearing was made explicit: “It is hardly fair to bring children into this world with the way things look for the future” (Srole 1956).
Only 64 % of the first wave respondents consented in writing to being interviewed for a second time.
The analysis excluded those who expected a child (were pregnant) at the time of the first interview. Those pregnant at the time of the second interview were marked as having successfully realized their intention.
This proved useful in a similar analysis; see Alesina and Fuchs-Schündeln (2007).
The importance of intention’s time-frame as regards realization is shown by the fact that 74 % of those planning to have a child within two years were successful in the Netherlands, while in Hungary only 40 % were able to realize their plans within three years. (Switzerland and Bulgaria 55 and 38 per cent respectively).
The higher failure rate of Bulgarian parents with one child, supported by using another database, is explained elsewhere (Kapitány and Spéder 2012).
This category includes also women looking after children without a leave.
See Blaskó and (2005) for detailed analysis of these processes.
There was no ISSP data collection in Georgia.
References
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Alesina, A., & Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2007). Good bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1507–1528.
Arts, W., Hermkens, P., & van Wijck, P. (1995). Anomie, distributive justice and dissatisfaction with material well-being in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 36(1–2), 1–16.
Bhaumik, S. K., & Nugent, J. B. (2005). Does economic uncertainty affect decision to bear children? Evidence from East and West Germany. William Davidson Institute Working Paper, Number, 788, 23.
Billingsley, S. (2010). The post-communist fertility puzzle. Population Research and Policy Review, 29(2), 193–231.
Blaskó, Zs. (2005). Dolgozzanak-e a nők? A magyar lakosság nemi szerepekkel kapcsolatos véleményének változásai, 1988, 1994, 2002 [Should Women Work? Changes in the Hungarian Population’s Opinion Related to Gender Roles, 1988, 1994, 2002]. Demográfia, 48(2–3), 159–186.
Bradurashvili, I., Kapanadze, E., & Tsiklauri, S. (2011). Generation and Gender Survey in Georgia II Wave (p. 75). Tbilisi: Georgian Centre of Population Research and UNFPA.
Bühler, C., & Philipov, D. (2005). Social capital related to fertility: theoretical foundations and empirical evidence from Bulgaria. In W. Lutz & G. Feichtinger (Eds.), Vienna Yearbook of Population Research (pp. 53–81). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
Cornia, G. A., & Paniccià, R. (1996). The transition’s population crisis: An econometric investigation on nuptiality, fertility and mortality in severely distressed economies. MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies., 6(1), 95–129.
Dahrendorf, R. (1990). Reflections on the Revolution in Europe. London: Chatto and Windus.
Easterlin, E. A. (1987). Birth and Fortune. The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Frejka, T. (1980). Fertility trends and policies: Czechoslovakia in the 1970s. Population and Development Review, 9(3), 63–93.
Frejka, T. (2008). Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Demographic Research, 19(7), 139–170.
Habich, R., & Spéder, Zs. (2000). Continuous changes: Different variations. Income distribution and dynamics in three societies. Sociological Review Special Issues, 2000, 1–26.
Hagenaars, J., Halman, L., & Moors, G. (2004). Exploring Europe’s basic value map. In W. Arts, J. Hagenaars, & L. Halman (Eds.), The Cultural Diversity of European Unity (pp. 23–58). Leiden: Brill European Values Study.
Hellevick, T., & Settersten, R. (2012). Life planning among young adults in 23 European countries: The effects of individual and country security. European Sociological Review,. doi:10.1093/esr/jcs069.
Inglehart, R. (1987). The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
Kapitány, B., & Spéder, Zs. (2012). Success and failure in the realisation of childbearing intentions. Comparing influencing factors in four European countries. Population-E, 67(4), 599–630.
Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–680.
Kopp, M., Skrabski, Á., Lőke, J., & Szedmák, S. (1999). The Hungarian State of Mind in a Transforming Society. In Zs Spéder (Ed.), Hungary in Flux. Society, Politics and Transformation. Hamburg: Kraemer.
Kornai, J. (1980). Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
Kotowska, I., Józwiack, J., Matysiak, A., & Baranowska, A. (2008). Poland: Fertility decline as response to profound societal and labor market changes? Demographic Research, 19(22), 795–853.
Koycheva, E., & Philipov, D. (2008). Bulgaria: Ethnic differentials in rapidly declining fertility. Demographic Research, 19(13), 361–402.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The Second Demographic Transition – An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and Family. Change in industrialised countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.
Lück, D. & Hofäcker, D (2003). Rejection and Acceptance of the Male Breadwinner Model: Which Preferences Do Women Have under Which Circumstances? Bamberg: GLOBALIFE Working Paper No. 60. p. 40. http://oldsite.soziologie-blossfeld.de/globalife/downloads/wp_zipped/wp060.pdf.
Mathwig, G., & Habich, R. (1997). Berufs- und Einkommensverläufe in Deutschland nach der Vereinigung. In S. Hradil & E. Pankoke (Hrsg.), Aufstieg für alle? (pp. 11–102). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Merton, R. (1968 [1980]). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press. [1980. (in Hungarian)].
Monier, A. (1989). Fertility intentions and actual behavior. A longitudinal study 1974, 1976, 1979. Population: An English Selection, 44(1), 237–259.
Morgan, S. P., & Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36, 91–118.
Müller, K., & Frick, J. (1996). Die Äquivalenzeinkommensmobilität in den neuen und alten Bundesländern 1990–1994. In R. Hauser, et al. (Eds.), Soziale Sicherheit für Alle? (pp. 103–154). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Perelli-Harris, B. (2008). Ukraine: On the border between old and new uncertain times, and below replacement. Demographic Research, 19(29), 1145–1178.
Philipov, D. (2003). Fertility in times of discontinuous societal change. In J. Kotowska (Ed.), Population of Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 665–689). Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.
Philipov, D. (2009). The effect of competing intentions and behaviour on short-term childbearing intentions and subsequent childbearing. European Journal of Population, 25, 525–548.
Philipov, D., Spéder, Zs, & Billari, F. C. (2006). Soon, later or ever: The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001). Population Studies, 60(3), 289–308.
Rabusic, L. (2001). Value change and demographic behaviour in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review, 9(1), 99–122.
Ranjan, P. (1999). Fertility behavior under income uncertainty. European Journal of Population, 15(1), 25–43.
Régnier-Loilier, A., & Vignoli, D. (2011). Fertility intentions and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy. Population-E, 66(2), 361–390.
Róbert, P. (1999). Gritting the Teeth: Embittered with the Change of System. In Zs. Spéder (Ed.), Hungary in Flux (pp. 87–116). Hamburg: Krämer.
Rodin, J. (2011). Fertility intentions and risk management: Exploring the fertility decline in Eastern Europe during transition. Ambio, 40, 221–230.
Roland, G. (2010). The long-run weight of communism or the weight of long-run history? UNU-WIDER Working paper No. 15. p. 25.
Rotariu, T. (2006). Romania and the second demographic transition. International Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 10–27.
Rychterikova, J. (2000). Demographic transition or demographic shock in recent population development in the Czech Republic? Acta Universitas Caroliane Geographica, 1, 89–102.
Schwartz, S. H., Bardi, A., & Bianchi, G. (2000). Value Adaptation to the Imposition and Collapse of Communist Regimes in East-Central Europe. In J. Duckitt & S. A. Renshon (Eds.), Political Psychology: Cultural and Cross Cultural Foundations (pp. 217–237). London: Macmillan.
Sobotka, T. (2002). Ten years of rapid fertility changes in the European post-communist countries. Evidence and interpretation. University of Groningen, Population Research Centre, Working Paper Series 02-1, p. 53.
Sobotka, T. (2008). The diverse faces of the Second Demographic Transition in Europe. Demographic Research, 19(7), 171–224.
Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., & Kantorová, V. (2003). Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1998: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population, 19(3), 249–277.
Spéder, Zs. (2003). Fertility behaviour in a period of economic pressures and growing opportunities: Hungary, the 1990s. In J. Kotowska (Ed.), Population of Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 457–484). Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.
Spéder, Zs, & Kamarás, F. (2008). Hungary: Secular fertility decline with distinct period fluctuations. Demographic Research, 19(18), 599–664.
Spéder, Zs, & Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment bringing forward. European Journal of Population, 25(4), 503–523.
Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 709–716.
Szeleva, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 115–131.
Testa, M. R. & Toulemon, L. (2006). Family formation in France: Individual preferences and subsequent outcomes. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 41–75.
Thornton, A., & Philipov, D. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population, 25(2), 123–156.
UN/ECE. (2000). Fertility decline in transition economies, 1989–1998. Economic and social forces Revisited. In Economic Survey of Europe 2000, No. 1 (pp. 189–207). New York: Economic Commission of Europe, UN.
Van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42 (1).
Vikat, A., Spéder, Zs., Beets, G., Billari, F.C., Bühler, C, Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., Hoem, J.M., MacDonald, A., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A. Pinnelli, A. and A. Solaz, 2007. Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research 17(14): 389–440. www.demographic-research.org.
Voicu, M., & Tufis, P. A. (2012). Trends in gender belief in Romania: 1993–2008. Current Sociology, 60(1), 61–80.
Westoff, C., & Ryder, N. (1977). The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography, 14(4), 431–453.
Arts, W., Geliessen, J. & Luijkx, R. (2004). Shall the twain ever meet? Differences and changes in socio-economic justice norms and beliefs in Eastern and Western Europe at the turn of the Millennium. In J. Hagenaars & L. Halman (Eds.): The Cultural Diversity of European Unity (pp. 185–216).
Zaharov, S. (2008). Russian Federation: From the first to second demographic transition. Demographic Research, 19(24), 908–971.
Zapf, W. (1995). Zwei Geschwindigkeiten in Ost- und Westdeutschland. In E. Holtman & H. Sahner (Eds.), Aufhebung der Bipolarität (pp. 69–81). Opladen: Laske + Budrich.
Zapf, W. (1996). Die Modernisierungstheorie und die unterschiedlichen Pfade der gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leviathan, 24(1), 63–77.
Acknowledgments
The research was carried out as part of the EU FP7 project “Reproductive decision making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO)”, Grant Agreement: SSH-2007- 3.1.2-217173, and the Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA) supported the completion of this study (No. NN776648). We benefited from discussions with research fellows of the REPRO project. We thank especially Arland Thornton and anonymous reviewers for useful comments and suggestions on previous drafts. A period spent at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock enabled finalization of the paper
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spéder, Z., Kapitány, B. Failure to Realize Fertility Intentions: A Key Aspect of the Post-communist Fertility Transition. Popul Res Policy Rev 33, 393–418 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9313-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9313-6