Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 943–968 | Cite as

A Multidimensional Approach in International Comparative Policy Analysis Based on Demographic Projections

  • Izhak BerkovichEmail author


The present study adopts a multidimensional approach to classifying countries in international comparative policy analyses. The article builds a data-based typology founded on future demographic projections of the United Nations. Latent class analysis is used to identify various demographic profiles of countries based on fertility rates, net migration rates, and dependency ratios. There is great value in identifying future changes in population composition, as it enables governments to set policy agenda, prioritize needs, and prepare better for what lies ahead. The paper demonstrates the value of such typology to social services, by analyzing the demographic profiles and estimating their implications for future challenges in educational provision. The contributions of the paper to international comparative policy analysis are discussed.


Demography Educational policy Planning Multiculturalism 


  1. Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5–22). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appleton, S., Morgan, W. J., & Sives, A. (2006). Should teachers stay at home? The impact of international teacher mobility. Journal of International Development, 18, 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2001). International data on educational attainment, updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC (2010, October 17). Merkel says German multicultural society has failed. BBC. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  5. BBC (2011, February 5). State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron. BBC. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  6. Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bongaarts, J. (1994). Population policy options in the developing world. Science, 263, 771–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, A., Dashwood, A., Lawrence, J., & Burton, L. J. (2010). ‘Crossing over’, strategies for supporting the training and development of international teachers. The International Journal of Learning, 17(4), 321–334.Google Scholar
  10. Bützer, M. (2007). Civic engagement and uncontrolled ballot votes: Evidence from Swiss cities. Local Government Studies, 33(2), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools, immigration and the no child left behind act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Carr, D. & Komp, K. (2011). Gerontology in the era of the third age, new challenges and new opportunities. Introduction. In D. Carr & K. Komp (Eds.), Gerontology in the era of the third age. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Carron, G., & Châu, T. N. (1981). Regional disparities in educational development. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  14. Châu, T. N. (2003). Demographic aspects of educational planning. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. (1995). How many people can the earth support?. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (2001). World population in 2050, assessing the projections. In J. S. Little & R. K. Triest (Eds.), Seismic shifts, the economic impact of demographic change (pp. 83–113). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
  17. College Board (2005). Impact of demographic changes on higher education. Summary of conference discussions. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  18. Coomans, G. (2005). The demography/education squeeze in a knowledge based economy 2000–2050. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  19. Dworkin, A. (1980). The changing demography of public school teachers, some implications for faculty turnover in urban areas. Sociology of Education, 53(2), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federal Statistical Office. (2006). Germany’s population by 2050, results of the 11th coordinated population projection. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  21. File, T., & Kominski, R. (2012). Dependency ratios in the United States: A state and metropolitan area analysis. Suitland: United States Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  22. Forstall, R. L., Greene, R. P., & Pick, J. B. (2004). Which are the largest? Why published populations for major world urban areas vary so greatly. Paper presented in the City Futures Conference, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, W. H. (2009). Immigration and the coming “majority minority”. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  24. Hagenaars, J. A., & Halman, L. C. (1989). Searching for ideal types: the potentialities of latent class analysis. European Sociological Review, 5, 81–96.Google Scholar
  25. Harpaz, Y. (2010). Conflicting logics in teaching critical thinking. Inquiry, 25(2), 5–17.Google Scholar
  26. Hinterlong, J., Tang, F., McBride, A. M., & Danso, K. (2006). Issues in elder service and volunteerism worldwide, toward a research agenda. In L. B. Wilson & S. P. Simson (Eds.), Civic engagement and the baby boomer generation, research, policy, and practice perspectives (pp. 213–246). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hodgkinson, H. L. (1985). All one system, demographics of education, kindergarten through graduate school. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
  28. Hodgkinson, H. L. (2003). Leaving too many children behind, a demographer’s view on the neglect of America’s youngest children. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
  29. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity, an integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahn, H., & Wiener, A. J. (1967). The year 2000, a framework for speculation on the next thirty-three years. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Kangas, O., & Ritakallio, V.-M. (1998). Different methods—different results? Approaches to multidimensional poverty. In H.-J. Andreβ (Ed.), Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective (pp. 167–203). Great Britain: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  32. Keepin, B., & Wynne, B. (1984). Technical analysis of IIASA energy scenarios. Nature, 312, 691–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly, D., & Smith, C. (2011). Bayesian inference for probabilistic risk assessment: A practitioner’s guidebook. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knapper, C., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  35. Larsen, K., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2002). International trade in educational services, good or bad? Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(3), 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, S. Y. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, S. Y., & Song, X. Y. (2003). Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with dichotomous variables. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 3073–3088.Google Scholar
  38. Lindley, D. V. (1985). Making decisions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Livi-Bacci, M. (2001). A concise history of world population, an introduction to population processes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Lopez, J. K. (2006). The impact of demographic changes on United States higher education 2000–2050. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  41. Lutz, W. (Ed.). (1991). Future demographic trends in Europe and North America: What can we assume today?. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lutz, W. (Ed.). (1996). The future population of the World: What can we assume today?. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, IIASA.Google Scholar
  43. Lutz, W., & KC, S. (2011). Global human capital: Integrating education and population. Science, 333, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lutz, W., Goujon, A., & Doblhammer-Reiter, G. (1998). Demographic dimensions in forecasting: Adding education to age and sex. In W. Lutz, W. Vaupel, & D. A. Ahlburg (Eds.), Frontiers of population forecasting, supplement to population and development review 24 (pp. 42–58). New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  45. Maarman, R., Steyn, E., & Wolhuter, C. (2006). Optimal demographic information for policy development in the South African education system. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 295–304.Google Scholar
  46. Marida, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. May, G. (1996). The future is ours, forecasting, managing and creating the future. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
  48. McKinsey and Company (2007). How the World’s best-performing school systems come out on top. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  49. Moisio, P. (2004). A latent class application to the multidimensional measurement of poverty. Quantity and Quality-International Journal of Methodology, 38(6), 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mosher, W. D., & Bachrach, C. A. (1996). Understanding U.S. fertility: Continuity and change in the national survey of family growth, 1988–1995. Family Planning Perspectives, 28(1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Muthen, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM, general latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nahas, C. (2009). Financing and political economy of higher education in Lebanon. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  53. OECD. (2000). Positioning secondary school education in developing countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  54. OECD. (2002). Trends in international migration. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  55. OECD. (2011). Education at a Glance 2010, OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pagoso, C. M., & Dinio, R. P. (2006). Labor economics. Philippines: Rex Book Store Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S., & Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Scenario planning, a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 17, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pool, I. (2007). Demographic dividends: Determinants of development or merely windows of opportunity? Ageing Horizons, 7, 8–35.Google Scholar
  59. Pool, I., & Wong, L. (2006). Age-structural transitions and policy: An emerging issue. In I. Pool, L. R. Wong, & E. Vilquin (Eds.), Age-structural transitions: Challenges for development (pp. 3–19). Paris: CICRED.Google Scholar
  60. Porta, E., & Laguna J. R. (2007). Guatemala-country case study. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  61. Pyvis, D., & Chapman, A. (2007). Why university students choose an international education: A case study in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raach, A. W. (2005). A Bayesian semiparametric latent variable model for binary, ordinal and continuous response. Doctoral thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.Google Scholar
  63. Ragin, C. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  64. Richard, I. (1981). The impact of demographic change on education systems in the European community. European Journal of Education, 16, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ringland, G. (2002). Scenarios in public policy. West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Ross, M. H. (1981). Socioeconomic complexity, socialization, and political differentiation: A cross-cultural study. Ethos, 9, 217–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shrestha, L. B. (2006). The changing demographic profile of the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  68. Siegel, J. (2001). Applied demography, applications to business, government, law and public policy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. Sleebos, J. E. (2003). Low fertility rates in OECD countries, facts and policy responses. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 64(4), 583–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steyn, H. J., & Wolhuter, C. C. (2000). The education system and probable societal trends of the twenty-first century. In H. J. Steyn & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Education systems of Emerging countries, challenges of the 21st century. Keurkopie: Noordbrug.Google Scholar
  72. Tessaring, M., & Wannan, J. (2004). Vocational education and training, key to the future. Thessaloniki: CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
  73. Thompson, D. M. (2007). Latent class analysis in SAS, Promise, problems, and programming. Paper 192. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  74. Tigchelaar, A., Brouwer, N., & Vermunt, J. (2010). Tailor-made, towards a pedagogy for educating second-career teachers. Educational Research Review, 5, 164–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Torres, C. A. (2011). Education, power, and the state, dilemmas of citizenship in multicultural societies. In H. A. Alexander, H. Pinson, & Y. Yonah (Eds.), Citizenship, education, and social conflict, israeli political education in global perspective. Jerusalem: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute.Google Scholar
  76. UNESCO. (2002). Education for all: Is the World on track?. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  77. UNESCO (2010). World data on education-Kenya. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  78. United Nations. (1966). World population prospects as assessed in 1963. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  79. United Nations. (1974). Report of the United Nations World population conference, Bucharest, 19–30 August 1974. New York: United Nations Population Fund.Google Scholar
  80. United Nations. (1988). World population prospects: 1988. New York: Department of International Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  81. United Nations (2011). World population prospects: The 2010 revision. Highlights and Advance Tables. New York: United Nations Population Division. Accessed 11 Dec 2011.
  82. Van der Gaag, N., & Van Wissen, L. (2001). Determinants of the subnational distribution of immigration. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 92(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  83. Walker, W. E., Harremoe ¨s, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J. P., van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., et al. (2003). Defining uncertainty, a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Whelan, C. T., & Maître, B. (2005). Vulnerability and multiple deprivation perspectives on economic exclusion in Europe: A latent class analysis. European Societies, 7(3), 423–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. World Bank (1990). Primary education. A World bank policy paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  86. World Bank (1995). Priorities and strategies for education. A World bank review. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  87. World Bank (1999). Education sector. Strategy paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  88. World Bank. (2001). Hidden challenges to education systems in transition economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  89. World Bank. (2004). Determinants of primary education outcomes in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  90. World Bank (2007). Turkey—higher education policy study. Volume I: Strategic directions for higher education in Turkey. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  91. Yates, J. R. (1988). Demography as it affects special education. In A. Ortiz & D. Ramirez (Eds.), Schools and the culturally diverse exceptional student, promising practices and future directions. Reson: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  92. Yousif, H. M., Goujon, A., & Lutz, W. (1996). Future population and education trends in the countries of North Africa. Research Report RR-96-11. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations