Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 261–284 | Cite as

Should International Migration Be Encouraged to Offset Population Aging? A Cross-Country Analysis of Public Attitudes in Europe

Article

Abstract

Concerns about population aging in Europe have occupied the attention of policy makers and demographers for over a decade. Some policy makers have proposed increased immigration to offset the aging of the population (i.e., replacement migration). However, demographers have estimated that a very high (and likely untenable) level of immigration would be required, and little is known about whether the national publics of Europe would support international migration as a potential solution to population aging. Using Eurobarometer data from 2006 and concurrent country-level measures from Eurostat, this study examines individual- and contextual-level factors related to public attitudes toward immigration as an effective solution to the problem of population aging in the current 27 member countries of the European Union. Results from multilevel logit analyses indicate that urban, university-educated, and childless individuals are consistently more likely than others to endorse replacement migration. Countries with more prosperous economies and proportionally fewer foreign-born residents also show more supportive attitudes. Such results echo research on anti-immigrant sentiment, suggesting considerable public resistance to population policies that might encourage large-scale immigration. At the same time, these findings show consistent patterns of endorsement despite demographers’ criticism of the concept of replacement migration and concerns about developing alternative long-term strategies.

Keywords

Anti-immigrant sentiment Immigration attitudes Population aging Replacement migration European Union Europe 

References

  1. Abernethy, V. D. (2001). Comment on Bermingham’s summary of the U.N.’s year 2000. Replacement migration, is it a solution to declining population and aging? Population and Environment, 22, 365–375.Google Scholar
  2. Annan, K. (2004, January 29). Why Europe needs an immigration policy. Statement of the United Nations Secretary General. http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/sg-29jan2004.htm. Accessed 12 October 2009.
  3. Bermingham, J. R. (2001). Immigration: Not a solution to problems of population decline and aging. Population and Environment, 22, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijak, J., Kupiszewska, D., & Kupiszewski, M. (2008). Replacement migration revisited: Simulations of the effects of selected population and labor market strategies for the aging Europe, 2002–2052. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bijak, J., Kupiszewska, D., Kupiszewski, M., Saczuk, K., & Kicinger, A. (2007). Population and labour force projections for 27 European countries, 2002–2052: Impact of international migration on population ageing. European Journal of Population, 23, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouvier, L. F. (2001). Replacement migration: Is it a solution to declining and aging populations? Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 22(4), 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brubaker, W. R. (1992). Citizenship struggles in Soviet successor states. International Migration Review, 26(2), 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceobanu, A. M. (2011). Usual suspects? Public views about immigrants’ impact on crime in European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(1–2), 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2008). East is West? National feelings and anti-immigrant sentiment in Europe. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1147–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2011). Paths to citizenship? Public views on the extension of rights to legal and second-generation immigrants in Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(2), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology, 24(2), 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, D. (2002). Replacement migration, or why everyone is going to have to live in Korea: A fable of our times from the United Nations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 357, 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, D. (2004a). Who’s afraid of low support ratios? An unofficial response from the UK to the UN population division report on replacement migration. Policy responses to population ageing and population decline. (Population Bulletin of the United Nations Special Issue Nos 44–45, pp. 288–329) New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, D. (2004b). Europe at the crossroads—must Europe’s population and workforce depend on new immigration? In V. Iontzev (Ed.), International migration: ICOD + 10, scientific series “International migration of population: Russia and contemporary world” (Vol. 12, pp. 19–33). Moscow: Max.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, D. (2008). The demographic effects of international migration in Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(3), 452–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman, D., & Rowthorn, R. (2011). Who’s afraid of population decline? A critical examination of its consequences. Population and Development Review, 37(Supplement), 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Figueredo, R. J. P, Jr, & Elkins, Z. (2003). Are patriots bigots? An inquiry into the vices of in-group pride. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dini, L. (2000, September 13). Statement by the minister of foreign affairs of Italy, the Hon. Lamberto Dini, to the 55th General Assembly of the United Nations. http://un.org/ga/webcast/statements/italyE.htm. Accessed 12 October 2009.
  20. Espenshade, T. J. (1994). Can immigration slow U.S. population aging? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13, 759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Espenshade, T. J. (2001). ‘Replacement migration’ from the perspective of equilibrium stationary populations. Population and Environment, 22, 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esveldt, I., Fokkema, T., & Miettinen, A. (2008). Anticipated impact of family policies on fertility behaviour among the childless and among one-child parents. People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies in Population, 16/1(Part VI), 369–390.Google Scholar
  23. Eurostat. (2006). Statistical portal of the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 15 October 2009.
  24. Eurostat. (2008). Demographic change: Challenge or opportunity? Eurostat yearbook 2008. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-CD-07-001-SPOT/EN/KS-CD-07-001-SPOT-EN.PDF. Accessed 14 March 2012.
  25. Fetzer, J. (2000a). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France and Germany. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fetzer, J. (2000b). Economic self-interest or cultural marginality? Anti-immigration sentiment and nativist political movements in France, Germany and the USA. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(1), 5–23.Google Scholar
  27. Fokkema, T., & Esveldt, I. (2008). Motivation to have children in Europe. People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies in Population, 16/1(Part III), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., & Testa, M. R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grant, L. (2001). ‘Replacement migration’: The U.N. Population Division on European population decline. Population and Environment, 22, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guo, G., & Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hello, E., Scheepers, P., & Gijsberts, M. (2002). Education and ethnic prejudice in Europe: Explanations for cross-national variances in the educational effect on ethnic prejudice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herm, A. (2008). Recent migration trends: Citizens of EU-27 member states become ever more mobile while EU remains attractive to non-EU citizens. Eurostat, Statistics in Focus, 98/2008. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-098/EN/KS-SF-08-098-EN.PDF. Accessed 14 March 2012.
  33. Hjerm, M. (2001). Education, xenophobia and nationalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hjerm, M. (2007). Do numbers really count? Group threat theory revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 1253–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, J. S., Brown, K. T., Brown, T. N., & Marks, B. (2001). Contemporary immigration policy orientations among dominant-group members in Western Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keely, C. B. (2001). Replacement migration: The wave of the future? International Migration, 39(6), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koropeckyj-Cox, T., & Pendell, G. (2007). The gender gap in attitudes about childlessness in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 899–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kreft, Ita G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Kunovich, R. M. (2002). Social structural sources of anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe. International Journal of Sociology, 32(1), 39–57.Google Scholar
  41. Lahav, G. (2004). Public opinion toward immigration in the European: Does it matter? Comparative Political Studies, 37, 1151–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liefbroer, A., & Merz, E-M. (2009). Report on analysis of ESS data on cross-national differences in perceived norms concerning fertility-related behaviour. Deliverable 6.16 Repro project. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/repro/assets/docs/Norms_fertility-behaviour.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2010.
  43. Livi Bacci, M. (2000). The population of Europe. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Luedtke, A. (2005). European integration, public opinion and immigration policies. European Union Politics, 6(1), 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lutz, W., O’Neill, B. C., & Scherbov, S. (2003). Europe’s population at a turning point. Science, 299, 1991–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes towards immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81(3), 909–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Merz, E.-M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2012). The attitudes toward voluntary childlessness in Europe: Cultural and institutional explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 587–600.Google Scholar
  49. Meyerson, F. A. B. (2001). Replacement migration: A questionable tactic for delaying the inevitable effects of fertility transition. Population and Environment, 22, 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miettinen, A., Esveldt, I, & Fokkema, T. (2008). Family policies: Financial or institutional measures? Preferences of childless persons and one-child parents. People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies in Population, 16/1(Part VI), 347–367.Google Scholar
  51. Pettigrew, T. F. (2000). Systematizing the predictors of prejudice. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 280–301). Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Saczuk, K. (2003). A development and critique of the concept of replacement migration. CEFMR Working Paper 4/2003. Warsaw, Poland: Central European Forum for Migration Research.Google Scholar
  55. Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Coenders, M. (2002a). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived group threat. European Sociological Review, 18(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Hello, E. (2002b). Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic minorities in Europe: Cross-national tests on a controversial relationship. Review of Religious Research, 43(3), 242–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schuman, H. (2000). The perils of correlation, the lure of labels, and the beauty of negative results. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 302–323). Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 71, 426–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2008). Foreigners’ impact on European societies: Public views in a cross-national comparative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sniderman, P. M., Hagendoorn, L., & Prior, M. (2004). Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions toward immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Sobotka, T., & Testa, M. R. (2008). Attitudes and intentions toward childlessness in Europe. People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies in Population, 16/1(PartIII), 177–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tarmann, A. (June 2000). The flap over replacement migration. Population Today. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2000/TheFlapOverReplacementMigration.aspx. Accessed on 23 October 2010.
  66. Teitelbaum, M. S. (2004). The media marketplace for garbled demography. Population and Development Review, 30, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Testa, M. R. (2006). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe. Special Eurobarometer 253/Wave 65.1-TNS Opinion & Social, European Commission. htpp://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/ReportESEMPLAAgeingandFertility20061027.pdf. Accessed 17 October 2009.
  68. Testa, M. R. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 357–379.Google Scholar
  69. United Nations (U.N.). (2000). Replacement migration: Is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?. New York: United Nations Population Division.Google Scholar
  70. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilkes, R., Guppy, N., & Farris, L. (2008). “No thanks, we’re full”: Individual characteristics, national context, and changing attitudes toward immigration. International Migration Review, 42, 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Youngblut, J. M., & Casper, G. R. (1993). Single-item indicators in nursing research. Research in Nursing & Health, 16, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zimmermann, K. F. (1995). Tackling the European migration problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 45–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminology & LawCenter for European Studies, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations