Should International Migration Be Encouraged to Offset Population Aging? A Cross-Country Analysis of Public Attitudes in Europe
Concerns about population aging in Europe have occupied the attention of policy makers and demographers for over a decade. Some policy makers have proposed increased immigration to offset the aging of the population (i.e., replacement migration). However, demographers have estimated that a very high (and likely untenable) level of immigration would be required, and little is known about whether the national publics of Europe would support international migration as a potential solution to population aging. Using Eurobarometer data from 2006 and concurrent country-level measures from Eurostat, this study examines individual- and contextual-level factors related to public attitudes toward immigration as an effective solution to the problem of population aging in the current 27 member countries of the European Union. Results from multilevel logit analyses indicate that urban, university-educated, and childless individuals are consistently more likely than others to endorse replacement migration. Countries with more prosperous economies and proportionally fewer foreign-born residents also show more supportive attitudes. Such results echo research on anti-immigrant sentiment, suggesting considerable public resistance to population policies that might encourage large-scale immigration. At the same time, these findings show consistent patterns of endorsement despite demographers’ criticism of the concept of replacement migration and concerns about developing alternative long-term strategies.
KeywordsAnti-immigrant sentiment Immigration attitudes Population aging Replacement migration European Union Europe
- Abernethy, V. D. (2001). Comment on Bermingham’s summary of the U.N.’s year 2000. Replacement migration, is it a solution to declining population and aging? Population and Environment, 22, 365–375.Google Scholar
- Annan, K. (2004, January 29). Why Europe needs an immigration policy. Statement of the United Nations Secretary General. http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/sg-29jan2004.htm. Accessed 12 October 2009.
- Coleman, D. (2004a). Who’s afraid of low support ratios? An unofficial response from the UK to the UN population division report on replacement migration. Policy responses to population ageing and population decline. (Population Bulletin of the United Nations Special Issue Nos 44–45, pp. 288–329) New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
- Coleman, D. (2004b). Europe at the crossroads—must Europe’s population and workforce depend on new immigration? In V. Iontzev (Ed.), International migration: ICOD + 10, scientific series “International migration of population: Russia and contemporary world” (Vol. 12, pp. 19–33). Moscow: Max.Google Scholar
- Dini, L. (2000, September 13). Statement by the minister of foreign affairs of Italy, the Hon. Lamberto Dini, to the 55th General Assembly of the United Nations. http://un.org/ga/webcast/statements/italyE.htm. Accessed 12 October 2009.
- Esveldt, I., Fokkema, T., & Miettinen, A. (2008). Anticipated impact of family policies on fertility behaviour among the childless and among one-child parents. People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies in Population, 16/1(Part VI), 369–390.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2006). Statistical portal of the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 15 October 2009.
- Eurostat. (2008). Demographic change: Challenge or opportunity? Eurostat yearbook 2008. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-CD-07-001-SPOT/EN/KS-CD-07-001-SPOT-EN.PDF. Accessed 14 March 2012.
- Fetzer, J. (2000a). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France and Germany. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fetzer, J. (2000b). Economic self-interest or cultural marginality? Anti-immigration sentiment and nativist political movements in France, Germany and the USA. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(1), 5–23.Google Scholar
- Herm, A. (2008). Recent migration trends: Citizens of EU-27 member states become ever more mobile while EU remains attractive to non-EU citizens. Eurostat, Statistics in Focus, 98/2008. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-098/EN/KS-SF-08-098-EN.PDF. Accessed 14 March 2012.
- Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kreft, Ita G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kunovich, R. M. (2002). Social structural sources of anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe. International Journal of Sociology, 32(1), 39–57.Google Scholar
- Liefbroer, A., & Merz, E-M. (2009). Report on analysis of ESS data on cross-national differences in perceived norms concerning fertility-related behaviour. Deliverable 6.16 Repro project. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/repro/assets/docs/Norms_fertility-behaviour.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2010.
- Livi Bacci, M. (2000). The population of Europe. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Merz, E.-M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2012). The attitudes toward voluntary childlessness in Europe: Cultural and institutional explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 587–600.Google Scholar
- Miettinen, A., Esveldt, I, & Fokkema, T. (2008). Family policies: Financial or institutional measures? Preferences of childless persons and one-child parents. People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies in Population, 16/1(Part VI), 347–367.Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, T. F. (2000). Systematizing the predictors of prejudice. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 280–301). Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Saczuk, K. (2003). A development and critique of the concept of replacement migration. CEFMR Working Paper 4/2003. Warsaw, Poland: Central European Forum for Migration Research.Google Scholar
- Schuman, H. (2000). The perils of correlation, the lure of labels, and the beauty of negative results. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 302–323). Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Tarmann, A. (June 2000). The flap over replacement migration. Population Today. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2000/TheFlapOverReplacementMigration.aspx. Accessed on 23 October 2010.
- Testa, M. R. (2006). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe. Special Eurobarometer 253/Wave 65.1-TNS Opinion & Social, European Commission. htpp://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/ReportESEMPLAAgeingandFertility20061027.pdf. Accessed 17 October 2009.
- Testa, M. R. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 357–379.Google Scholar
- United Nations (U.N.). (2000). Replacement migration: Is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?. New York: United Nations Population Division.Google Scholar
- Zimmermann, K. F. (1995). Tackling the European migration problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 45–62.Google Scholar