This paper investigates the political framing of population in policy discourse through an analysis of legislative documents. Semantic network analysis was conducted and results were interpreted through discourse analysis of the typical arguments identified. Policy texts were classified into three sets: population management, reproductive health and family planning, and anti-abortion and anti-FP. While the “population management” frame focuses on social and economic consequences of population growth, the “reproductive health” frame defines the problem from a health perspective. Both policies propose aggressive FP programs but each frame uses distinct political rhetoric and semantic approach in its arguments. The “anti-abortion and anti-FP” frame identifies two problems: rise in incidence of abortion and existing policy that prohibit health professionals from refusing patients information on contraception. By invoking a moral argument and anchoring on rights, these policies challenge the problem and solutions identified by the first two frames.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams, J., Braun, V., & McCreanor, T. (2008). Framing gay men’s health: An analysis of policy documents. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–126.
Altheide, D. (2007). The mass media and terrorism. Discourse & Communication, 1, 287–308.
Bancroft, A., & Wilson, S. (2007). The ‘risk gradient’ in policy on children of drug and alcohol users: Framing young people as risky. Health, Risk & Society, 9, 311–322.
Barnett, M. N. (1999). Culture, strategy, and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 5–36.
Barrett, D., & Tsui, A. O. (1999). Policy as symbolic statement: International response to national population policies. Social Forces, 78, 213–234.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Mahoney, C. (2008). The two face of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union. European Union Politics, 9, 435–449.
Brysk, A. (1995). Hearts and minds: Bringing symbolic politics back in. Polity, 27, 559–585.
Campbell, D. (1998). Writing security: War, terrorism, and democracy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99–118.
Christie, T. (2006). Framing rationale for the Iraq war. The International Communication Gazette, 68, 519–532.
Commission on Population. (2000). The Philippine Population Management Program (PPMP) 2001–2004 Directional Plan. Mandaluyong City: Commission on Population.
Crawley, C. E. (2007). Localized debates of agricultural biotechnology in community newspapers: A quantitative content analysis of media frames and sources. Science Communication, 28, 314–346.
David, C. C., Atun, J. L., & La Viña, A. G. M. (2010). Framing the population debate: A comparison of source and news frames in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Communication, 20, 337–353.
David, C. C., Atun, J. L., & La Viña, A. G. M. (2011). Framing the population debate: Final report submitted to Institute of Philippine Culture. Unpublished manuscript.
Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.
Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the news left. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Hahn, H. (1985). Toward a politics of disability definitions, disciplines and policies. Social Science Journal, 22, 87–105.
Joachim, J. (2003). Framing issues and seizing opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and women’s rights. International Studies Quarterly, 47, 247–274.
Johnson, S., Cupeper, J., & Suhr, S. (2003). From ‘politically correct councilors’ to ‘Blairite nonsense’: Discourses of ‘political correctness’ in three British newspapers. Discourse & Society, 14(1), 29–47.
Kinder, D., & Sanders, L. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of White opinion on affirmative action for Blacks. Social Cognition, 8(1), 73–103.
Koch, J. W. (1998). Political rhetoric and political persuasion: The changing structure of citizens’ preferences on health insurance during policy debate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 209–229.
Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2002). The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: How the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 143–154.
Lee, S. T., Maslog, C., & Kim, H. S. (2006). Asian conflicts and the Iraq war: A comparative framing analysis. The International Communication Gazette, 68(5–6), 499–518.
Lind, R. A., & Salo, C. (2002). The framing of feminists and feminism in news and public affairs programs in U.S. electronic media. Journal of Communication, 52, 211–228.
Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258–279.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Stull, D. D. (1987). The symbolic side of policy analysis. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), Confronting values in policy analysis. NY: Sage.
Murphy, P. (2001). Affiliation bias and expert disagreement in framing the nicotine addiction debate. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26, 278–299.
Murphy, P., & Maynard, M. (2000). Framing the genetic testing issue: Discourse and cultural clashes among policy communities. Science Communication, 22, 133–153.
NSO & ICF Macro. (2009). National Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Calverton, Maryland: National Statistics Office and ICF Macro.
Orbeta, A. (2002). Review of the population program: 1986–2002. Paper prepared for Population Commission and the Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 59–79.
Papacharissi, Z., & Oliviera, M. F. (2008). News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in U.S. and U.K. newspapers. Press/Politics, 13, 52–74.
Payne, R. A. (2001). Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 37–61.
Prentice, S. (2010). Using automated semantic tagging in Critical Discourse Analysis: A case study on Scottish independence from a Scottish nationalist perspective. Discourse & Society, 21, 406–438.
Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progresses in the communication sciences (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Rhee, J. W. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47, 26–48.
Roth, A., Dunsbery, J., & Bero, L. (2003). Framing processes in public commentary on US Federal Tobacco Control Regulation. Social Studies of Science, 33(1), 7–44.
Schon, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Schuck, A., & De Vreese, C. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21, 5–32.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93–109.
Simon, A. F., & Jerit, J. (2007). Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57, 254–271.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
Stewart, C., Gil-Egui, G., Tian, Y., & Pileggi, M. I. (2006). Framing the digital divide: A comparison of US and EU policy approaches. New Media and Society, 8, 731–751.
Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550–569.
Vliegenthart, R., & Roggeband, C. (2007). Framing immigration and integration: Relationships between press and parliament in the Netherlands. The International Communication Gazette, 69, 295–319.
Woelfel, J. K., Danielsen, S., & Woelfel, J. (1995). Catpac for Windows. Troy, NY: Terra Research & Computing Co., The Galileo Company.
Zaller, J. (2001). Monical Lewinsky and the mainsprings of American politics. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics (pp. 252–278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Research reported in this paper is supported by grants from the Institute of Philippine Culture of the Ateneo de Manila University and the University of the Philippines Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Development.
About this article
Cite this article
David, C.C., Atun, J.M.L. & La Viña, A.G.M. Framing in Legislation: The Case of Population Policy in the Philippines. Popul Res Policy Rev 31, 297–319 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9224-3
- Semantic network analysis
- Legislation analysis
- Reproductive health
- Family planning