Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 119–140 | Cite as

The Environmental Impact of Immigration: An Analysis of the Effects of Immigrant Concentration on Air Pollution Levels

  • Carmel E. PriceEmail author
  • Ben Feldmeyer


Despite growing interest in the impact of immigration on U.S. society, research has rarely examined the effects of immigration flows on the natural environment. The current study addresses this gap in research using data on 183 Metropolitan Statistical Areas drawn from the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to empirically assess the relationships between contemporary immigration and seven measures of air pollution. In doing so, we seek to (1) broaden knowledge about the social consequences of immigration to include its potential effects on the environment, (2) address competing theoretical perspectives about immigration-environment relationships (i.e., population pressure/social disorganization versus ecological footprint/community resource perspectives), and (3) extend knowledge about the predictors and sources of environmental harm within local communities. In contrast to popular opinion and population pressure positions, our research indicates that immigration does not contribute to local air pollution levels across any of the seven pollution measures examined.


Immigration Pollution Environment Ecological footprint 



The authors would like to thank R. Scott Frey, Stephanie A. Bohon, and Meghan E. Conley for their useful comments to earlier versions of this manuscript.


  1. Atiles, J. H., & Bohon, S. A. (2003). Camas calientes: Housing adjustments and barriers to social and economic adaptation among Georgia’s rural Latinos. Southern Rural Sociology, 19(1), 97–122.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, A. A., & Lytwak, E. P. (1995). Zero growth of the population of the United States. Population and Environment, 16(5), 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, R. (1996). The case against immigration: The moral, economic, social, and environmental reasons for reducing U.S. immigration back to traditional levels. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Blumenberg, E. & Shiki, K. (2008). Immigrants and resource sharing: The case of carpooling. Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, 22.Google Scholar
  5. Bohon, S. A., Stamps, K., & Atiles, J. H. (2008). Transportation and migrant adjustment in Georgia. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(3), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter, M. (2000). Fertility of Mexican immigrant women in the U.S.: A closer look. Social Science Quarterly, 81(4), 1073–1086.Google Scholar
  7. Catton, W. R. (1980). Overshoot: The ecological basis of revolutionary change. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (2006). Human population: The next half century. In D. Kennedy (Ed.), Science Magazine’s state of the planet 2006–2007 (pp. 13–21). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, M. A., & Neumayer, E. (2004). Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Environment, 26(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramer, J. C. (1998). Population growth and air quality in California. Demography, 35, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cramer, J. C. (2002). Population growth and local air pollution: methods, models, and results. In W. Lutz, A. Prskawetz, & W. C. Sanderson (Eds.), Population and environment (A supplement to Vol. 28), Population and development review (pp. 22–52). New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  12. Crowder, K., & Downey, L. (2010). Interneighborhood migration, race, and environmental hazards: Modleing microlevel processes of environmental inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1110–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1992). Population, sustainability, and Earth’s carrying capacity. BioScience, 42(10), 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, A. H., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1995). Response to Bartlett and Lytwak (1995): Population and immigration policy in the United States. Population and Environment, 16(6), 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Desmond, S. A., & Kubrin, C. E. (2009). The power of place: Immigrant communities and adolescent violence. The Sociological Quarterly, 50, 581–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence, and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1, 277.Google Scholar
  17. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1992). The most overpopulated nation. In L. Grant (Ed.), Elephants in the Volkswagen: Facing the tough questions about our overcrowded country. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Ehrlich, P., & Holdren, J. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldmeyer, B. (2009). Immigration and violence: The offsetting effects of immigration on Latino violence. Social Science Research, 38, 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feldmeyer, B. (2010). Segregation and violence: Comparing the effects of residential segregation on Latino and Black violence. The Sociological Quarterly, 51, 600–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldmeyer, B., & Steffensmeier, D. (2009). Immigration effects on homicide offending for total and race/ethnicity-disaggregated populations (white, black, and Latino). Homicide Studies, 13, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster, J. B. (2002). Malthus’s essay on population at age 200. In J. B. Foster (Ed.), Ecology against capitalism (pp. 137–154). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garling, S. (1998). Immigration policy and the environment: The Washington DC metropolitan area. Population and Environment, 20(1), 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, C. A. S., Pontius, R. G., Jr., Coleman, L., & Ko, J.-Y. (1994). The environmental consequences of having a baby in the United States. Population and Environment, 15(6), 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton, L. C. (2009). Statistics with STATA. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  27. Healey, J. F. (2006). Race, ethnicity, gender, and class: The sociology of group conflict and change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Heim, M., & Austin, N. (1996). Fertility and immigrant women in California. Population and Environment, 17(5), 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hunter, L. M. (2000a). A comparison of environmental attitudes, concern, and behaviors of native-born and foreign-born U.S. residents. Population and Environment, 21(6), 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunter, L. M. (2000b). The spatial association between U.S. immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. International Migration Review, 34(2), 460–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hynes, P. H. (1999). Taking population out of the equation: Reformulation I = PAT. In J. Silliman & Y. King (Eds.), Dangerous intersections: Feminist perspectives on population, environment, and development (pp. 39–73). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ilea, R. C. (2009). Intensive livestock farming: Global trends, increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(2), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, K. M., & Lichter, D. T. (2008). Natural increase: A new source of population growth in emerging Hispanic destinations in the United States. Population and Development Review, 34(2), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kraly, E. P. (1995). U.S. immigration and the environment: Scientific research and analytic issues. U.S. Commission on Immigration ReformGoogle Scholar
  35. Kraly, E. P. (1998). Immigration and environment: A framework for establishing a possible relationship. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, M. T., Martinez, R., Jr., & Rosenfeld, R. (2001). Does immigration increase homicide? Negative evidence from three border cities. The Sociological Quarterly, 42(4), 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Light, I., & Gold, S. J. (2000). Ethnic economies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Malthus, T. (1797). An essay on the principle of population. London: St. Paul Church Yard.Google Scholar
  40. Mann, D. (1990). Fewer people for a better world. Environmental Conservation, 17, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martinez, R., Jr. (2002). Latino homicide: Immigration, violence, and community. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Martinez, R., Jr. (2006). Coming to America: The impact of the new immigration on crime. In R. Martinez Jr. & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Immigration and Crime: Race, Ethnicity, and Violence. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Martinez, R., Jr., & Lee, M. (1998). Immigration and the ethnic distribution of homicide in Miami, 1985–1995. Homicide Studies, 2(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martinez, R., Jr., & Lee, M. T. (2000). On immigration and crime. Criminal Justice, 1, 485–524.Google Scholar
  45. Muradian, R. (2006). Immigration and the environment: Underlying values and scope of analysis. Ecological Economics, 59(2), 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neumayer, E. (2006). The environment: One more reason to keep immigrants out? Ecological Economics, 59, 204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ousey, G. C., & Kubrin, C. E. (2009). Exploring the connection between immigration and violent crime rates in U.S. cities, 1980–2000. Social Problems, 56(3), 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson, R. D., & Krivo, L. J. (2005). Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new directions for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pew Hispanic Center (2009). Statistical Portrait of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States, 2007.Google Scholar
  50. Pfeffer, M. J., & Stycos, J. M. (2002). Immigrant environment behaviors in New York City. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Population-Environment Balance, Inc. (1992). Why excess immigration damages the environment. Population and Environment, 13(4), 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait (3rd ed., rev., expanded, and updated ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Portes, A., & Stepick, A. (1993). City on the edge: The transformation of Miami. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  54. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1992). Gaining the upper hand: Economic mobility among immigrant and domestic minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15, 491–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. President’s Council on Sustainable Development. (1996). Population and Consumption Task Force report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  56. Preston, S. (1996). The effect of population growth on environmental quality. Population Research and Policy Review, 15, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rees, W. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriate carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sampson, R. J. (2008). Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts, 7(1), 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sampson, R. J., & Bean, L. (2006). Cultural mechanisms and killing fields: A revised theory of community-level racial inequality. In R. Peterson, L. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 13–63). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Shi, A. (2003). The impact of population pressure on global Carbon dioxide emissions, 1975–1996: Evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simcox, D. E. (1992). Sustainable immigration: Learning to say no. In L. Grant (Ed.), Elephants in the Volkswagen: Facing the tough questions about our overcrowded country. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
  63. Squalli, J. (2009). Immigration and environmental emissions: A U.S. county-level analysis. Population and Environment, 30, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Squalli, J. (2010). An empirical assessment of U.D. state-level immigration and environmental emissions. Ecological Economics, 69, 1170–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic- black–white comparisons. Criminology, 39(1), 145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevens, D. J. (2010). Media and criminal justice: The CSI effect. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Stowell, J. I. (2007). Immigration and crime: The effects of immigration on criminal behavior. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1927). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  69. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008). National air quality: Status and trends through 2007. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA Publication No. EPA-454/R-08-006.Google Scholar
  70. Velez, M. B. (2006). Toward an understanding of the lower rates of homicide in Latino versus black neighborhoods: A look at Chicago. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), Many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 91–107). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  72. White, T. (2007). Sharing resources: The global distribution of the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 402–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003a). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003b). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zuckerman, B. (1999). The Sierra Club immigration debate: National implications. Population and Environment, 20(5), 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyFurman UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations