Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 287–312 | Cite as

How do Recent Population Trends Matter to Climate Change?

  • Leiwen JiangEmail author
  • Karen Hardee


Although integrated assessment models (IAM) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) consider population as one of the root causes of greenhouse gas emissions, how population dynamics affect climate change is still under debate. Population is rarely mentioned in policy debates on climate change. Studies in the past decade have added significantly to understanding the mechanisms and complexity of population and climate interactions. In addition to the growth of total population size, research shows that changes in population composition (i.e. age, urban–rural residence, and household structure) generate substantial effects on the climate system. Moreover, studies by the impact, vulnerability and adaptation (IAV) community also reveal that population dynamics are critical in the near term for building climate change resilience and within adaptation strategies. This paper explores how global population dynamics affect carbon emissions and climate systems, how recent demographic trends matter to worldwide efforts to adapt to climate change, and how population policies could make differences for climate change mitigation and adaptation.


Population Climate change Demographic trend Mitigation and adaptation 


  1. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2005). Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature, 438, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bindoff, N. L., Willegrand, J., Artale, V., Cazenave, A., Gregory, S., Hanawa, K., Le Quere, C., Levitus, S., Nojiri, Y., Shum, C. K., Talley, L. D., & Unnikrishnan, A. (2007). Observations: Oceanic climate change and sea level. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2008). The demographic dividend. A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  4. Bongaarts, J. (2008). Fertility transitions in developing countries: Progress or stagnation? Studies in Family Planning, 39(2), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell-Lendrum, D., Kovats, S., McMichael, A. J., Corvalan, C. F., Menne, B., & Pruss-Ustun, A. (2005). The global burden of disease due to climate change: Quantifying the benefits of stabilization for human health. Paper presented at conference Avoiding dangerous climate change, Met Office, Exter, UK, 1–3 Feb 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Campell, K. M., Gulledge, J., McNeill, J.R., Podesta, J., Ogden, P., Fuerth, L., Woosley, R. J., Lennon, A. T. J., Smith, J., Weitz, R., & Mix, D. (2007). The age of consequences: The foreign policy and national security implications of global climate change. Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Center for New American Security.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, W. A. V., & Deurloo, M. C. (2006). Aging in place and housing over-consumption. Journal of Housing Built Environment, 21, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleland, J., & Bernstein, S. (2006). Family planning: The unfinished agenda. The Lancet, 368(9549), 1810–1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, M. A., & Neumayer, E. (2004). Examining the impacts of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Environment, 26, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramer, J. (1997). A demographic perspective on air quality: A conceptual issues surrounding environmental impacts of population growth. Human Ecology Review, 3, 191–196.Google Scholar
  11. Cramer, J. C. (1998). Population growth and air quality in California. Demography, 35, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, M., Jiang, L., Shonali, P., & O’Neill, B. C. (2007). Demographic change and future carbon emissions in China and India. New York: Population Association of America.Google Scholar
  13. Dalton, M., O’Neill, B. C., Prskawetz, A., Jiang, L., & Pitkin, J. (2008). Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States. Energy Economics, 30, 642–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Sherbinin, A., Carr, D., Cassels, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). Population and environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1, 277–300.Google Scholar
  16. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2007). Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorius, S. F. (2008). Global demographic convergence? A reconsideration of changing intercountry inequality in fertility. Population and Development Review, 34, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrlich, P., & Holdren, J. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emanuel, K. (2005). Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature, 435, 686–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emanuel, K. (2008). Hurricanes and global warming: Results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fan, Y., Liu, L.-C., Wu, G., & Wei, Y.-M. (2006). Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D. W., & Siddall, M. (2007). Climate change and trace gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365, 1925–1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A., & Varney, S. K. (Eds.). (1992). Climate change 1992: The IPCC supplementary report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoyos, C. D., Agudelo, P. A., Webster, P. J., & Curry, A. J. (2006). Deconvolution of the factors contributing to the increase in global hurricane intensity. Science, 312, 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jiang, L. (1999). Population and sustainable development in China. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.Google Scholar
  28. Jiang, L., Hoepf, M., & Hardee, K. (2008). Population, urbanization and the environment. World Watch, 21, 34–39.Google Scholar
  29. Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2004). The energy transition in rural China. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 21, 2–26.Google Scholar
  30. Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2007). Impacts of demographic trend on US household size and structure. Population and Development Review, 33, 429–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, D. W. (1989). Urbanization and energy use in economic development. The Energy Journal, 10, 29–44.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, D. W. (2004). Urbanization and energy. Encyclopedia of Energy, 6, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaya, Y. (1990). Impacts of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, response Strategies Working Group, Paris.Google Scholar
  34. Keatinge, W. R., Donaldson, G. C., Cordioli, E., Martinelli, M., Kunst, A. E., Mackenbach, J. P., et al. (2000). Heat related mortality in warm and cold regions of Europe: Observational study. British Medical Journal, 321, 670–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kent, M. M., & Haub, C. (2005). Global demographic divide. Population bulletin. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  36. Knutson, T. R. (2008). Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty-first-century warming conditions. Nature Geoscience, 3, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knutson, T. R., & Robert Tuleya, E. (2004). Impacts of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation: Sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. Journal of Climate, 17, 3477–3495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kosatsky, T. (2005). The 2003 European heat waves. EuroSurveillance, 10(2005), 148–149.Google Scholar
  39. Kovats, S. (Ed.). (2008). Health effects of climate change in the UK 2008: An update of the Department of Health report 2001/2002. Department of Health and Health Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  40. Liu, Y. (2009). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy, 34, 1846–1854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421, 530–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (2001). The end of world population growth. Nature, 412, 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (2007). IIASA’s 2007 probabilistic world population projections. IIASA World Population Program. Accessed 20 Jan 2009.
  44. Mackellar, F. L., Lutz, W., Prinz, C., & Goujon, A. (1995). Population, households and CO2 emission. Population and Development Review, 21, 849–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCarthy, J., Canziani, O., Leary, N., & White, K. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  46. McGranahan, G., Balk, D., & Anderson, B. (2007). The rising tide: Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 19, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McMichael, A. J., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Corvalan, C. F., Ebi, K. L., Githeko, A., Scheraga, J. D., et al. (2003). Climate change and human health—risk and responses. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  48. McMichael, A. J., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Kovats, S., Edwards, S., Wilkinson, P., Wilson, T., Nicholls, R. J., Hales, S., Tanser, F., Le Sueur, D., Schlesinge, M., & Andronova, N. (2004). Chapter 20: Global climate change. In M. Ezzati, A. Lopez, A. Rogers, & C. Mathers (Eds.), Comparative quantification of health risks: Global and regional burden of disease due to selected major risk factors (pp. 1543–1649). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  49. Meyerson, F. A. B. (1998). Population, development and global warming: Averting the tragedy of the climate commons. Population and Environment, 19, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Military Advisory Board. (2007). National security and the threat of climate change. The CNA Corporation.Google Scholar
  51. Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2000). Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nakićenović, N., Fisher, B., Alfsen, K., Corfee Morlot, J., de la Chesnaye, F., Hourcade, J.-C., Jiang, K., Kainuma, M., La Rovere, E. L., Rana, A., Riahi, K., Richels, R., vanVuuren, D. P., & Warren, R. (2007). Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context. In B. Meta, O. Davidson, P. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nicholls, R. J. (2004). Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: Changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 14, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nicholls, R. J., Wong, P. P., Burkett, V. R., Codignotto, J. O., Hay, J. E., McLean, R. F., Ragoonaden, S., & Woodroffe, C. D. (2007). Coastal systems and low lying areas. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, J. P. Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation on vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. O’Neill, B. C. (2009). Climate change and population growth. In L. Mazur (Ed.), A pivotal moment: Population, justice and the environmental challenge. New York: Island Press.Google Scholar
  56. O’Neill, B. C., & Chen, B. S. (2002). Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. Population and Development Review, 28, 53–88.Google Scholar
  57. Pachauri, S. (2004). An analysis of cross-sectional variation in total household energy requirements in India using micro survey data. Energy Policy, 32, 1732–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pachauri, S., & Jiang, L. (2008). The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy, 36, 4022–4035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palutikof, P. J., Subak, S., & Agnew, M. D. (Eds.). (1997). Economic impacts of the hot summer and unusually warm year of 1995. Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  60. Parikh, J. K., & Painuly, J. P. (1994). Population, consumption patterns and climate change: A socioeconomic perspective from the South. Ambio, 23, 434–437.Google Scholar
  61. Parikh, J., & Shukla, V. (1995). Urbanization, energy use and greenhouse effects in economic development—results from a cross-national study of developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 5, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Parry, M. L., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Livermore, M., & Fischer, G. (2004). Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 14, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parry, M. L., Rosenzweig, C., & Livermore, M. (2005). Climate change, global food supply and risk of hunger. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 2125–2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pearce, F. (2005). Warming world blamed for more strong hurricanes. New Scientist.Google Scholar
  66. Pielke, R. A., Gratz, J., Landsea, C. W., Collins, D., Saunders, M. A., & Musulin, R. (2008). Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Natural Hazards Review, 9, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pinstrup-Aderesen, P. (2002). Food and agricultural policy for a globalizing world: Preparing for the future. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 1201–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prskawetz, A., Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2004). Demographic composition and projections of car use in Austria. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 1, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reiter, P., Thomas, C., Atkinson, P., Hay, S., Randolph, D., Rogers, D., et al. (2004). Global warming and malaria: A call for accuracy. The Lancet Infectious Disease, 4, 323–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rogers, D., & Randolph, S. (2000). The global spread of malaria in the future warmer world. Science, 289, 1763–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosa, E. A., York, R., & Dietz, T. (2004). Tracking the anthropogenic drivers of ecological impacts. Ambio, 32, 509–512.Google Scholar
  72. Ross, J. (2004). Understanding the demographic dividend. Washington, DC: Futures Group, POLICY Project.Google Scholar
  73. Schar, C., & Jendritzky, G. (2004). Climate change: Hot news from summer 2003. Nature, 432, 559–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sedgh, G., Hussain, R., Bankole, A., & Singh, S. (2007). Women with an unmet need for contraception in developing countries and their reasons for not using a method. Occasional report no. 37. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  75. Shi, A. (2003). The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975–1996: Evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecological Economics, 44, 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simon, H., de Wet, N., Maindonald, J., & Woodward, A. (2002). Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: An empirical model. The Lancet, 360, 830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Singh, S., Darroch, J. E., Vlassoff, M., & Nadeau, J. (2003). Adding it up: The benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health care. Washington, DC: The Allan Guttmacher Institute and UNFPA.Google Scholar
  78. Speidel, J., & Grossman, R. (2007). Family planning and safe legal abortion are vital to safeguard the environment. Contraception, 76(2007), 415–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stern, N. (2006). Stern review executive summary. New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  80. Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., & Allen, M. R. (2004). Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature, 432, 610–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. UNDP. (1999). Human development report. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
  82. UNEP. (2007). Global outlook for ice & snow. Norway: Birkeland.Google Scholar
  83. UNFPA. (2008). ICPD programme of action. Accessed 1/2/09.
  84. UNPD. (2007). World population prospects: The 2006 Revision, highlights. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  85. USAID Health Policy Initiatives. (2006). Achieving the millennium development goals: The contribution of fulfilling the unmet need for family planning. Washington, DC: Futures Group, Health Policy Initiatives. Written by Scott Moreland and Sandra Talbird.Google Scholar
  86. US-EPA. (2008). Climate change-health and environmental effects (EPA, Ed.). Washington, DC: EPA. Sept. 5, 2008.
  87. Van Diepen, A. (1994). Demografische ontwikkelingen en milieugebruik. In N. van Nimwegen & G. Beets (Eds.) Bevolkingsvraagstukken in Nederland Anno 1994: Demografisch Ontwikkelingen in Maatschappelijk Perspectief (pp. 357–374, Vol. 35). Den Haag: NIDI.Google Scholar
  88. van Diepen, A. (2000). Household and their Spatial-Energetic Practices. Searching for Sustainable Urban forms. Groningen, Utrecht: FRW, RUG/KNAG.Google Scholar
  89. Vellinga, P., & Leatherman, S. P. (1989). Sea level rise, consequences and policies. Climatic Change, 15, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vlassof, M. (2004). Assessing costs and benefits of sexual and reproductive health interventions. Occasional report no, 11. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  91. Worku, M. (2007). The missing links: Poverty, population and the environment in Ethiopia. FOCUS on Population, Environment and Security, 14, 1–8.Google Scholar
  92. World Bank. (1999). World development report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  93. World Resources Institute, United Nations Environment Programme. (2000). Tomorrow’s markets, global trends, and their implications for business. Paris: UNEP.Google Scholar
  94. Yamasaki, E., & Tominaga, N. (1997). Evolution of an aging society and effects on residential energy demand. Energy Policy, 25, 903–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. York, R. (2007). Demographic trends and energy consumption in European Union Nations, 1960–2025. Social Science Research, 24, 855–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zeng, Y., Land, K., Wang, Z., & Gu, D. (2006). US family household momentum and dynamics—extension of ProFamy method and application. Population Research and Policy Review, 25, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zeng, Y., Wang, Z., Jiang, L., & Gu, D. (2008). Projection of family households and elderly living arrangement in the context of rapid population aging in China—a demographic window of opportunity until 2030 and serious challenges thereafter. Genus, LVIV(1–2), 9–36.Google Scholar
  99. Zigova, K., Fuchs, R., Jiang, L., O’Neill, B. C., & Pachauri, S. (2009). Household survey data used in calibrating the Population-Environment-Technology model. IIASA Interim Report IR-09-026.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Population Action InternationalWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations