Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 129–150 | Cite as

Welfare Use Among Older Hispanic Immigrants: The Effect of State and Federal Policy

Article

Abstract

This study examines the effect of state and federal welfare policy changes on the use of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) among older Hispanic immigrants in the US. The results contribute to the ongoing debate about whether the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 had a “chilling effect” on welfare use. Using data from the 1990 and 2000 US Censuses of Population, we use multi-level binomial logistic regression to evaluate whether state levels of welfare generosity contribute to the probability of SSI use among eligible older Hispanics. Our results show that the decline in SSI receipt between 1990 and 2000 is greater among older Hispanic non-citizens from Mexico, Central and South America as compared to their naturalized and US-born Hispanic counterparts. We also demonstrate that state differences in welfare generosity did not moderate the effect of federal policies during this time period as was expected.

Keywords

Welfare reform Hispanic elders Immigrants Supplemental Security Income 

References

  1. Alba, R., Lutz, A., & Vesselinov, E. (2001). How enduring were the inequalities among European immigrant groups in the U.S.? Demography, 38(3), 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bean, F. D., Van Hook, J. W., & Glick, J. E. (1997). Country of origin, type of public assistance, and patterns of welfare recipiency among U.S. immigrants and natives. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 432–451.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borjas, G. J. (2002). The impact of welfare reform on immigrant welfare use. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Borjas, G. J. (2003). Welfare reform, labor supply, and health insurance in the immigrant population, NBER Working Paper Series (pp. 42). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Borjas, G. J. (2004). Food insecurity and public assistance. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1421–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borjas, G. J., & Hilton, L. (1996). Immigration and the welfare state: Immigrant participation in means-tested entitlement programs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fix, M. E., & Passel, J. S. (1994). Immigration and immigrants: Setting the record straight. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Fix, M. E., & Passel, J. S. (1999). Trends in non-citizens’ and citizens’ use of public benefits following welfare reform. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Fix, M. E., & Passel, J. S. (2002). The scope and impact of welfare reform’s immigrant provisions. Retrieved October, 2006 from http://www.urban.org/Uploadedpdf/410412_discussion02-03.pdf.
  11. Fix, M. E., Passel, J. S., & Sucher, K. (2003). Trends in naturalization. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Fix, M. E. & Tumlin, K. (1997). Welfare reform and the devolution of immigrant policy. Series A, No. A-15. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Haider, S. J., Schoeni, R. F., Bao, Y., & Danielson, C. (2004). Immigrants, welfare reform, and the economy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 745–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hao, L., & Kawano, Y. (2001). Immigrants’ welfare receipt and opportunity for contact with co-ethnics. Demography, 38(3), 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He, W. (2002). The older foreign-born population in the United States. 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, W. (1998). Elderly immigrants on welfare. The Journal of Human Resources, 33(3), 711–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, M., & Preston, S. H. (1990). Who lives with whom? Individual versus household measures. Journal of Family History, 15(2), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ku, L., Fremstad, S., & Broaddus, M. (2003). Noncitizens’ use of public benefits has declined since 1996: Recent report paints misleading picture of impact of eligibility restrictions on immigrant families. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
  19. Lofstrom, M., & Bean, F. D. (2002). Labor market conditions and post-reform declines in welfare receipt among immigrants. Demography, 39(4), 617–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin, D.C. & Hoefer, M. (2009). Refugees and Asylees: 2008. DHS office of immigration statistics annual flow report. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved online January 2010 at: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/ois_rfa_fr_2008.pdf.
  21. Mutchler, J. E., & Angel, J. L. (2000). Policy development and the older Latino population in the 21st century. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 11(2/3), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Passel, J. S. (2006). The size and characteristics of the unauthorized migrant population in the U.S. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
  23. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2009). A portrait of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
  24. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., & duToit, M. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  25. Social Security Administration. (2008). Social security: Understanding the benefits. Retrieved online December 2008 from: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/ssi/text-general-ussi.html.
  26. Treas, J. (1997). Older immigrants and U.S. welfare reform. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17(9/10), 8–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tumlin, K. C., Zimmerman, W., & Ost, J. (1999). State snapshots of public benefits for immigrants: A supplemental report to patchwork policies (No. 24, Supplemental Report). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Turra, C., & Elo, I. T. (2008). The impact of salmon bias on the Hispanic mortality advantage: New evidence from Social Security data. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(5), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). Local area unemployment statistics information and analysis: Unemployment rates by State, seasonally adjusted. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Foreign-born population of the United States (Table 3.11). Retrieved online January 2009 from: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/foreign/ppl-160.html.
  31. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). Population projections of the United States by age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, and nativity: 1999 to 2100. Retrieved online December 2008 from: http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/natproj.html.
  32. U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Public Use Microdata Sample, (PUMS). Technical documentation, United States. Retrieved online November 2008 at http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/doc/pums.pdf.
  33. U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Older Americans 2008: Key indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Retrieved online January 2008 from: http://agingstats.gov.
  34. U.S. House of Representative, Committee on Ways, Means. (2000). 2000 Green Book: Section 3-Supplemental Security Income. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  35. Van Hook, J. W. (2000). SSI eligibility and participation among elderly naturalized citizens and non-citizens. Social Science Research, 29, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Hook, J. W. (2003). Welfare reform’s chilling effects on non-citizens: Changes in non-citizen welfare recipiency or shifts in citizenship status. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 613–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Hook, J. W., & Bean, F. D. (1999). The growth in noncitizen SSI caseloads 1979–1996: Aging versus new immigrant effects. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B(1), S16–S23.Google Scholar
  38. Van Hook, J. W., Bean, F. D., & Glick, J. E. (1996). The development and assessment of Census-based measures of AFDC and SSI recipiency. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 22(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  39. Van Hook, J. W., Brown, S. L., & Bean, F. D. (2006). For love or money? Welfare reform and immigrant naturalizations. Social Forces, 85(2), 643–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Hook, J. W., Glick, J. E., & Bean, F. D. (1999). Public assistance receipt among immigrants and natives: How the unit of analysis affects research findings. Demography, 36(1), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zimmerman, W., & Tumlin, K. C. (1999). Patchwork policies: State assistance for immigrants under welfare reform (No. 24). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sealy Center on AgingUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of GerontologyUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations