Increasing Migration, Diverging Communities: Changing Character of Migrant Streams in Rural Thailand
This paper studies how increasing migration changes the character of migrant streams in sending communities. Cumulative causation theory posits that past migration patterns determine future flows, as prior migrants provide resources, influence, or normative pressures that make individuals more likely to migrate. The theory implies exponentially increasing migration flows that are decreasingly selective. Recent research identifies heterogeneity in the cumulative patterns and selectivity of migration in communities. We propose that this heterogeneity may be explained by individuals’ differential access to previously accumulated migration experience. Multi-level, longitudinal data from 22 rural Thai communities allow us to measure the distribution of past experience as a proxy for its accessibility to community members. We find that migration becomes a less-selective process as migration experience accumulates, and migrants become increasingly diverse in socio-demographic characteristics. Yet, selectivity within migrant streams persists if migration experience is not uniformly distributed among, and hence not equally accessible to, all community members. The results confirm that the accumulation and distribution of prior migrants’ experiences distinctly shape future migration flows, and may lead to diverging cumulative patterns in communities over time.
KeywordsInternal migration Cumulative causation Selectivity Thailand
This research was funded by research grants from Center for Migration and Development at Princeton University and NSF (SES-0525942). The authors thank the research team from the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina and the Institute for Population and Social Research at Mahidol University for their data collection efforts and the villagers of Nang Rong district, Buriram province, Thailand for their cooperation.
- Balan, J., Browning, H. L., & Jelin, E. (1973). Men in a developing society: Geographic and social mobility in Monterrey, Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bello, W., Cunningham, S., & Poh, L. K. (1998). A Siamese tragedy: Development and disintegration in Modern Thailand. London: Zed Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Chamratrithirong, A., Archavanitkul, K., Richter, K., Guest, P., Varachai, T., Boonchalaksi, W., et al. (1995). National Migration Survey of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
- Mills, M. B. (1997). Thai women in the global labor force: Consuming desires, contested selves. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
- Nidhiprabha, B. (1994). determinants of private investment expenditures and driect foreign investment in Thailand. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. (1998). Thailand’s boom and bust. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J. E. (1986). Differential migration, networks, information and risk (Vol. 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Warr, P. (1993). The Thai economy in transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar