Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Pregnancy Intention on Child Well-Being and Development: Combining Retrospective Reports of Attitude and Contraceptive use

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research has documented a relationship between unintended pregnancy and negative consequences for infants and children. Much of this research is based on retrospective reports of intention, but this method has been critiqued as subject to biases in recall and reporting. Non-retrospective measures have also been employed, but these are less widely available and tend to be hindered by limited samples. Using the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and its 1991 Longitudinal Follow-Up, a composite measure of reported pregnancy intention and birth control use is constructed to attempt to overcome some limitations of the use of retrospective reports of intention. This composite measure is compared to more conventional measures through analyses predicting the effects of pregnancy intention on child health, activity, and development. Across the different constructions of the pregnancy intention measure, children from unintended pregnancies have poorer outcomes. They are more likely to have less than excellent health, undesirable activity levels, and below median scores on a development assessment. The composite measure predicts similarly to the more conventional measures of intention, but provides an additional dimension that helps address some of the concerns about bias in retrospective reporting, while maintaining the benefit of application in existing large and representative samples. Researchers and policy makers need to continue their concern about the effects of unintended pregnancies, and need widely available measures to understand determinants, consequences, and prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Abma A. Chandra W.D. Mosher L.S. Peterson L.J. Piccinino (1997) ArticleTitleFertility, family planning, and women’s health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth Vital Health Statistics 23 IssueID19 1–114

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bachrach S. Newcomer (1999) ArticleTitleIntended pregnancy and unintended pregnancy: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives 31 250–251

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Baydar (1995) ArticleTitleConsequences for children of their birth planning status Family Planning Perspectives 27 228–234

    Google Scholar 

  • S.S. Brown L. Eisenberg (1995) The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bustan A. Coker (1994) ArticleTitleMaternal attitude toward pregnancy and the risk of neonatal death American Journal of Public Health 84 411–414

    Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Campbell W.D. Mosher (2000) ArticleTitleA history of the measurement of unintended pregnancies and births Maternal and Child Health Journal 4 163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • G.B. Colley M.D. Brantley M.K. Larson (2000) Family planning practices and pregnancy intention, 1997 Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • H.P. David (1986) ArticleTitleUnwanted children: A follow-up from Prague Family Planning Perspectives 18 143–144

    Google Scholar 

  • H.P. David Z. Matejcek (1981) ArticleTitleChildren born to women denied abortion: An update Family Planning Perspectives 13 32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • H.P. David Z. Dytrych Z. Matejcek V. Schuller (1988) Born unwanted: Developmental effects of denied abortion Springer Publishing New York

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Dye M. Mojtowycz R. Aubry J. Quade H. Kilburn (1997) ArticleTitleUnintended pregnancy and breast-feeding behavior American Journal of Public Health 87 1709–1711

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Dytrych Z. Matejcek V. Schuller H.P. David H.L. Friedman (1975) ArticleTitleChildren born to women denied abortion Family Planning Perspectives 7 165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • W.K. Frankenberg J.B. Dodds (1967) ArticleTitleThe Denver Developmental Screening Test Journal of Pediatrics 71 181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • S.K. Henshaw (1998) ArticleTitleUnintended pregnancy in the United States Family Planning Perspectives 30 24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Hummer K.A. Hack R.K. Raley (2004) ArticleTitleRetrospective reports of pregnancy wantedness and child well-being in the United States Journal of Family Issues 25 404–428 Occurrence Handle10.1177/0192513X03257712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Hummer C.P. Schemertmann I. Eberstein S. Kelly (1995) ArticleTitleRetrospective reports of pregnancy wantedness and birth outcomes in the United States Social Science Quarterly 76 402–418

    Google Scholar 

  • T.J. Joyce M. Grossman (1990) ArticleTitlePregnancy wantedness and the early initiation of prenatal care Demography 27 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • T.J. Joyce R. Kaestner S. Korenman (2000) ArticleTitleThe effect of pregnancy intention on child development Demography 37 83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Kleinman S. Kessel (1987) ArticleTitleRacial differences in low birth weight New England Journal of Medicine 317 IssueID12 749–753

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kost J.D. Forrest (1995) ArticleTitleIntention status of U.S. births in 1988: Differences by mothers’ socioeconomic and demographic characteristics Family Planning Perspectives 27 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kost D.J. Landry J.E. Darroch (1998a) ArticleTitleThe effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care Family Planning Perspectives 30 223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kost D.J. Landry J.E. Darroch (1998b) ArticleTitlePredicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: Does intention status matter? Family Planning Perspectives 30 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd C.B. & Montgomery M. (1996). The consequences of unintended fertility for investments in children: Conceptual and methodological issues. Working Paper No. 89, Population Research Division, New York, NY

  • National Center for Health Statistics [NCHS]. (1991). National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, 1988 [computer file]. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics [producer], 1991. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]

  • National Center for Health Statistics [NCHS]. (1995). National Maternal and Infant Health Survey – Longitudinal Follow-Up, 1991 [computer file]. Hyattsville MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics [producer], 1993. Ann Arbor MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]

  • P. Newacheck W.J. Jameson N. Halfon (1994) ArticleTitleHealth status and income: The impact of poverty on child health Journal of School Health 64 229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J., (2004). PRAMS and unintended pregnancy. Atlanta GA: Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/pdf/PRAMSUnintendPreg.pdf

  • R. Peterson M.K. Moos (1997) ArticleTitleDefining and measuring unintended pregnancy: Issues and concerns Women’s Health Issues 7 234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Piccinino L.S. Peterson (1999) ArticleTitleAmbivalent attitudes and unintended pregnancy Advances in Population 3 227–249

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Pulley L.V. Klerman H. Tang B.A. Baker (2002) ArticleTitleThe extent of pregnancy mistiming and its association with maternal characteristics and behaviors and pregnancy outcomes Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34 206–211

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Sable (1999) ArticleTitlePregnancy intention may not be a useful measure for research on maternal and child health outcomes Family Planning Perspectives 31 249–250

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Sable J.C. Spencer J.W. Stockbauer W.F. Schramm V. Howell A. Herman (1997) ArticleTitlePregnancy wantedness and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences by race and Medicaid status Family Planning Perspectives 29 76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Schoen N.M. Astone Y.J. Kim C.A. Nathanson J.M. Fields (1999) ArticleTitleDo fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family 61 790–799

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Trussell B. Vaughan J. Stanford (1999) ArticleTitleAre all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth Family Planning Perspectives 31 246–247

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Weller I. Eberstein M. Bailey (1987) ArticleTitlePregnancy wantedness and maternal behavior during pregnancy Demography 24 407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Williams J. Abma L.J. Piccinino (1999) ArticleTitleThe correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: A prospective analysis Family Planning Perspectives 31 220–227

    Google Scholar 

  • L.S. Zabin (1999) ArticleTitleAmbivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use – and pregnancy Family Planning Perspectives 31 250–251

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah R. Crissey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crissey, S.R. Effect of Pregnancy Intention on Child Well-Being and Development: Combining Retrospective Reports of Attitude and Contraceptive use. Popul Res Policy Rev 24, 593–615 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-005-5734-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-005-5734-1

Keywords

Navigation