Skip to main content
Log in

Population Trends in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan America: Selective Deconcentration and the Rural Rebound

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses revised annual population estimates that incorporate adjustments from the 2000 Census to backcast demographic change for U.S. counties during the 1990s. These data are supplemented with new post-censal population estimates for 2001–2003. We use these data to examine demographic trends in the late 1990s and first years of the new century. Our findings are consistent with a model suggesting that a selective deconcentration of the U.S. population is underway. Our findings also confirm the occurrence of the rural rebound in the first half of the 1990s and a waning of this rebound in the late 1990s. Post-censal data also suggest a modest upturn in nonmetropolitan population growth rates in 2001–2003.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beale, C.L. (1975), The revival of population growth in nonmetropolitan America. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • C.L. Beale (2001) ArticleTitleNonmetro population growth recedes in a time of unprecedented national prosperity Rural Conditions and Trends 11 IssueID2 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Champion (1998) Studying counterurbanization and the rural population turnaround P.J. Boyle K.H. Halfacree (Eds) Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues Wiley London, England 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Cromartie (2001) ArticleTitleNonmetro outmigration exceeds inmigration for the first time in a decade Rural America 16 IssueID2 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (2001), The unexpectedly large census count in 2000 and its implications, Research Report 01-467. Ann Arbor: Population Studies Center.

  • Frey, W.H. (1995), The new geography of U.S. population shifts: Trends toward balkanization, pp. 271–334, in: Farley (ed.), New York: Russell Sage.

  • W.H. Frey K.M. Johnson (1998) Concentrated immigration, restructuring and the selective deconcentration of the U.S. population P.J. Boyle K.H. Halfacree (Eds) Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues Wiley London, England 79–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.M. (2000), Migration to rural America: Historical trends and future prospects. Paper presented at the Conference on Changing Landscapes of Rural America, Yellowstone Park, WY.

  • K.M. Johnson (1989) ArticleTitleDemographic change in nonmetropolitan America Rural Sociology 54 IssueID3 301–326

    Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Johnson C.L. Beale (1994) ArticleTitleThe recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States Rural Sociology 59 655–667

    Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Johnson C.L. Beale (2002) ArticleTitleNonmetro recreation counties: Their identification and rapid growth Rural America 17 IssueID4 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Johnson G.V. Fuguitt (2000) ArticleTitleContinuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995 Rural Sociology 65 IssueID1 27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.M., Fuguitt, G.V., Hammer, R., Voss, P. & McNiven, S. (2003), Recent age-specific net migration patterns in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis, MN.

  • L. Kusmin (2002) ArticleTitleRural employment turned down in 2001 as unemployment continued to climb Rural America 17 IssueID1 40–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. & Nucci, A. (1996), Convergence or divergence in urban-rural fertility differences in the United States? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, CA.

  • L. Long A. Nucci (1997) ArticleTitleThe clean break revisited: Is U.S. population again deconcentrating? Environment and Planning A 29 1355–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D.A. (1999), Natural amenities drive rural population change. Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. AER 781. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

  • E.J. Taaffe S. Krakover H. Gauthier (1992) ArticleTitleInteractions between spread-and-backwash, population turnaround and corridor effects in the inter-metropolitan periphery: A case study Urban Geography 13 503–533 Occurrence Handle10.2747/0272-3638.13.6.503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Wardwell (1977) ArticleTitleEquilibrium and change in nonmetropolitan growth Rural Sociology 42 156–178

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth M. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, K.M., Nucci, A. & Long, L. Population Trends in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan America: Selective Deconcentration and the Rural Rebound. Popul Res Policy Rev 24, 527–542 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-005-4479-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-005-4479-1

Keywords

Navigation