Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of a Minnesota Welfare Reform Program on marital stability six years later

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do welfare reform policies affect marital stability among two-parent families? Long term findings from an experiment in Minnesota, evaluated via a random assignment design, contribute to the little evidence to date about whether or not welfare and income-support policies can affect marital stability. In 1994, Minnesota began to test a major welfare reform initiative that emphasized financial incentives for work, a participation requirement for long-term recipients, and the simplification of rules and procedures for receiving public assistance. An analysis of this program's long-run effects on marital stability for two-parent families finds no effect overall but contrasting effects for several subgroups. MFIP particularly lowered the rate of divorce among families who were already receiving welfare when they entered the study. There are less consistent effects among new applicants to MFIP – who show a trend toward higher rates of divorce relative to the control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, G. & S. Nelson (2004), Changes in living arrangements during the late 1990s: Do welfare policies matter? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(2): 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1973), A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81: 813–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1974), A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy 82: 511–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitler, M., Gelbach, J.B., Hoynes, H.W. & Zavodny, M. (2004), The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography 41(2): 213–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G.G. & Wissoker, D. (1990), A reanalysis of marital stability in the Seattle– Denver income-maintenance experiment. American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1235–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R., Ebert-Wallace, L., Sun, Y., Simons, R., McLoyd, V. & Brody, G. (2002), Economic pressure in African–American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology 38(2): 179–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R.D., Reuter, M.A. & Elder, G.H., Jr. (1999), Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76(1): 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K. (1999), What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Mimeo.

  • Edin, K. (2000), Few good men: Why poor women don't remarry. The American Prospect 11 (4).

  • Ellwood, D. (2000), The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal 53: 1063–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, D. (2003), The determinants of marriage and cohabitation among disadvantaged Americans: Two themes from a literature review. Conference paper. Marriage and Family Formation among Low-Income Couples: What do we know from Research? Georgetown University, Washington, DC, September, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, D., London, R.A. & Mauldon, J. (2002), Welfare reform and family formation: Assessing the effects. A research brief from the Welfare Reform and Family Formation Project, Bethesda, MD: Apt Associates. www.abtassociates.com/wrffproject.

  • Fitzgerald, J.M. & Ribar, D. (2004). Welfare reform and female headship. Demography 41(2): 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraker, T., Ross, C. A., Stapulonis, R., Olsen, R., Kovac, R.M., Dion, M. & Rangarajam, A. (2002), The evaluation of welfare reform in Iowa: Final impact report, Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L. & Knox, V. (2003), Staying single: The effects of welfare reform policies on marriage and cohabitation. Next Generation Working Paper No. 19. New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L. & C. Miller (in press). How welfare reform can affect marriage: Evidence from an experimental study in Minnesota. Review of Economics of the Household.

  • Groeneveld, L.P., Tuma, N.B. & Hannan, M.T. (1980), The effects of negative income tax programs on marital dissolution, The Journal of Human Resources 15(4): 654–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., Tuma, N.B. & Groeneveld, L.P. (1977), Income and marital events: Evidence from an income maintenance experiment, American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1186–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harknett, K. & Gennetian, L.A. (2003), How an earnings supplement can affect union formation among low-income single mothers, Demography 40(3): 451–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoynes, H. (1997). Does welfare play any role in female headship decisions? Journal of Public Economics 65: 89–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W. (2003). Marriage and economic incentives: Evidence from a welfare experiment, Journal of Human Resources 38(4): 942–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, V., Miller, C. & Gennetian, L.A. (2000), Reforming welfare and rewarding work: A summary of the final report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program, New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T., McLaughlin, D.K. & Ribar, D. C. (1997), Welfare and the rise in femaleheaded families, American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 112–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. & Sandefur, G. (1994), Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., Knox, V., Gennetian, L.A., Dodoo, M., Hunter, J.A. & Redcross, C. (2000), Reforming welfare and rewarding work: Final report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program (Vol.1): Effects on adults, New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1990), The effect of the U.S. welfare system on marital status, Journal of Public Economics 41(1): 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1992), Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: A review, Journal of Economic Literature 30: 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1994), Welfare effects on female headship with area effects, Journal of Human Resources 29: 621–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1998), The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility, in Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior, Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (2002), Economic effects of means-tested transfers in the U.S. NBER. Working Paper No. 8730, January.

  • Oppenheimer, V. (1988), A theory of marriage timing: Assortative mating under varying degrees of uncertainty, American Journal of Sociology 94: 563–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.P. (1994), Marital status and fertility in the United States: Welfare and labor market effects, Journal of Human Resources 29(2): 637–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • US House of Representatives (1996), 1996 green book, Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1987), The truly disadvantaged, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, A.E. (1995), Does AFDC-UP encourage two-parent families? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14(1): 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gennetian, L.A., Knox, V. The effects of a Minnesota Welfare Reform Program on marital stability six years later. Population Research and Policy Review 23, 567–593 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-004-2708-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-004-2708-7

Navigation