Population and Environment

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 465–490

Post-disaster fertility: Hurricane Katrina and the changing racial composition of New Orleans

Original Paper
  • 223 Downloads

Abstract

Large-scale climate events can have enduring effects on population size and composition. Natural disasters affect population fertility through multiple mechanisms, including displacement, demand for children, and reproductive care access. Fertility effects, in turn, influence the size and composition of new birth cohorts, extending the reach of climate events across generations. We study these processes in New Orleans during the decade spanning Hurricane Katrina. We combine census data, ACS data, and vital statistics data to describe fertility in New Orleans and seven comparison cities. Following Katrina, displacement contributed to a 30% decline in birth cohort size. Black fertility fell, and remained 4% below expected values through 2010. By contrast, white fertility increased by 5%. The largest share of births now occurs to white women. These fertility differences—beyond migration-driven population change—generate additional pressure on the renewal of New Orleans as a city in which the black population is substantially smaller in the disaster’s wake.

Keywords

Fertility Disasters Hurricane Katrina New Orleans Race/Ethnicity 

Supplementary material

11111_2017_273_MOESM1_ESM.docx (93 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 92.8 kb).
11111_2017_273_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 2(DOCX 16 kb).
11111_2017_273_MOESM3_ESM.docx (22 kb)
ESM 3(DOCX 22 kb).

References

  1. Allison, P.D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (Vol. 160). SAGE publicationsGoogle Scholar
  2. American Anthropological Association. (1998). Statement on “race”Google Scholar
  3. Barreca, A., Deschenes, O., & Guldi, M. (2015). Maybe next month? Temperature shocks, climate change, and dynamic adjustments in birth rates. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 21681.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, D. (2009). Constructing crime, framing disaster: routines of criminalization and crisis in Hurricane Katrina. Punishment & Society, 11(4), 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1993). “identity and representation: elements for a critical reflection on the idea of region.” In language and symbolic power. Edited by John Thompson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brauner-Otto, S. R. (2014). Environmental quality and fertility: the effects of plant density, species richness, and plant diversity on fertility limitation. Popul Environ, 36(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brubaker, R. (2006). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Campanella, R. (2014). Two centuries of paradox: the geography of New Orleans’s African American population, from antebellum to postdiluvian times. In R. J. S. Romain Huret (Ed.), Hurricane Katrina in transatlantic perspective (pp. 8–37). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carballo, M., Hernandez, M., Schneider, K., & Welle, E. (2005). Impact of the tsunami on reproductive health. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98.Google Scholar
  10. US Census Bureau. (2013). Population estimates: intercensal estimates of the resident population by five-year age groups, sex, race, and Hispanic origin for counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2010. Retrieved May 26, 2016, from https://www.census.gov/popest/data/intercensal/county/CO-EST00INT-alldata.html.
  11. US Census Bureau. 2016. Census longitudinal infrastructure project. https://census.gov/about/adrm/linkage/projects/clip.html Accessed 12/4/2016.
  12. Cherlin, A., Cumberworth, E., Morgan, S. P., & Wimer, C. (2013). The effects of the great recession on family structure and fertility. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 214–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohan, C., & Cole, S. (2002). Life course transitions and natural disaster: marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. J Fam Psychol, 16(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creel, L. (2002). Meeting the reproductive health needs of displaced people. Population Reference Bureau, MEASURE Communication Policy Brief. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/pdf/Meetng ReproHlthDispl_Eng.pdf
  15. Curtis, K. J., Fussell, E., & DeWaard, J. (2015). Recovery migration after hurricanes Katrina and Rita: spatial concentration and intensification in the migration system. Demography, 52(4), 1269–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cutter, S., Emrich, C., Mitchell, J., & Boruff, B. (2006). The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina.: Science and Policy, 48(2).Google Scholar
  17. Deitz, S., & Barber, K. (2015). Geographies of inequality, urban renewal, and race, gender, and class post-Katrina New Orleans. Race, Gender & Class, 134–159Google Scholar
  18. Diaz, L., & Fussell, E. (2015). Latinos in Metro New Orleans: progress, problems, and potential. The New Orleans Index at Ten. Report from The Data Center. Retrieved from http://www.DataCenterResearch.org
  19. Dynes, R. R., & Rodriguez, H. (2010). Finding and framing Katrina. the sociology of Katrina: perspectives on a modern catastrophe. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 25–36.Google Scholar
  20. Ehrenfeucht, R., & Nelson, M. (2013). Young professionals as ambivalent change agents in New Orleans after the 2005 hurricanes. Urban Stud, 50(4), 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellington, S. R., Kourtis, A. P., Curtis, K. M., Tepper, N., Gorman, S., Jamieson, D. J., et al. (2013). Contraceptive availability during an emergency response in the United States. Journal of Women’s. Health (2002), 22(3), 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, R. W., Hu, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2010). The fertility effect of catastrophe: US hurricane births. J Popul Econ, 23(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falk, W. W., Hunt, M. O., & Hunt, L. L. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and New Orleanians’ sense of place: return and reconstitution or “gone with the wind”? Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 3(01), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finch, C., Emrich, C. T., & Cutter, S. L. (2010). Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Popul Environ, 31(4), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forman, T. A., & Lewis, A. E. (2006). Racial apathy and Hurricane Katrina. Du Bois Review, 3(1), 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frey, W. H., Singer, A., & Park, D. (2007). Resettling New Orleans: the first full picture from the Census. Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.Google Scholar
  27. Fussell, E. (2009). Hurricane chasers in New Orleans: Latino immigrants as a source of a rapid response labor force. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesGoogle Scholar
  28. Fussell, E. (2015). The long-term recovery of New Orleans’ population after Hurricane Katrina. Am Behav Sci, 59(10), 1231–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ, 31(1–3), 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fussell, E., Curtis, K. J., & Dewaard, J. (2014). Recovery migration to the City of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a migration systems approach. Popul Environ, 35(3), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gabe, T., Falk, G., & Mccarty, M. (2005). Hurricane Katrina: docial-demographic characteristics of impacted areas. CRS Report for Congress, November, 4, 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Galloway, P. R. (1986). Long-term fluctuations in climate and population in the preindustrial era. Popul Dev Rev, 1–24.Google Scholar
  33. Geaghan, K.A. (2011). Forced to move: an analysis of Hurricane Katrina movers: 2009 American Housing Survey: New Orleans. SEHSD Working Paper Number 2011–17.Google Scholar
  34. Grace, K., & Nagle, N. N. (2015). Using high-resolution remotely sensed data to examine the relationship between agriculture and fertility in Mali. Prof Geogr, 67(4), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Green, R., Bates, L. K., & Smyth, A. (2007). Impediments to recovery in New Orleans’ upper and lower ninth ward: one year after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters, 31(4), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2008). The effect of Hurricane Katrina on the labor market outcomes of evacuees. Am Econ Rev, 98(2), 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2010). Going home after Hurricane Katrina: determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography, 47(4), 821–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Mathews, T. J., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2009). The effect of Hurricane Katrina: births in the US Gulf Coast region, before and after the storm. National Vital Statistics Reports : From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics. System, 58(2), 1–28 32.Google Scholar
  39. Hamoudi, A., E. Frankenberg, C. Sumantri, & D. Thomas. (2014). Impact of the December 2004 Tsunami on Birth Outcomes in Aceh, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Hapsari, E. D., Widyawati, W. A., Nisman, L., Lusmilasari, R. S., & Matsuo, H. (2009). Change in contraceptive methods following the Yogyakarta earthquake and its association with the prevalence of unplanned pregnancy. Contraception, 79(4), 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hill, K. (2005). War, humanitarian crises, population displacement, and fertility: a review of evidence. National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirsch, A. R., & Levert, A. L. (2009). The Katrina conspiracies: the problem of Trust in Rebuilding an American City. Journal of urban. History, 35(2), 207–219.Google Scholar
  43. Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. & M.J. Abbasi-Shavazi. (2013). Demographic consequences of the 2003 Bam earthquake. International Conference on the Demography of Disasters. Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
  44. Hummer, R. A. (1996). Black-white differences in health and mortality: a review and conceptual model. Sociol Q, 37(1), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC). 2015. World Disaster. Report, 2014.Google Scholar
  46. Joffe, M. (2003). Infertility and environmental pollutants. Br Med Bull, 68(1), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson, C. (2015). Gentrifying New Orleans: thoughts on race and the movement of capital. Souls, 17(3–4), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kahn, M. E. (2005). The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Review of economics and statistics, 87(2), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kates, R. W., Colten, C. E., Laska, S., & Leatherman, S. P. (2006). Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103(40), 14653–14660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaufman, J. S., & Cooper, R. S. (2001). Commentary: considerations for use of racial/ethnic classification in etiologic research. Am J Epidemiol, 154(4), 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kissinger, P., Schmidt, N., Sanders, C., & Liddon, N. (2007). The effect of the Hurricane Katrina disaster on sexual behavior and access to reproductive care for young women in New Orleans. Sex Transm Dis, 34(11), 883–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knabb, R.D., Rhome, J.R. & Brown, D.P. (2005). Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina 23–30 August 2005 Update. Report National Hurricane Center. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL122005_Katrina.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.
  53. Lacy, M.G. & Haspel, K. C. (2011). The media’s framing of black looters, shooters, and brutes in Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath: In Critical Rhetorics of Race (pp. 21–46). NYU PressGoogle Scholar
  54. Lam, D. A., & Miron, J. A. (1996). The effects of temperature on human fertility. Demography, 33(3), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lay, J. C. (2009). Race, retrospective voting, and disasters the re-election of C. Ray Nagin after Hurricane Katrina. Urban Stud, 44(5), 645–662.Google Scholar
  56. Leyser-Whalen, O., Rahman, M., & Berenson, A. B. (2011). Natural and social disasters: racial inequality in access to contraceptives after Hurricane Ike. Journal of Women’s. Health (2002), 20(12), 1861–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lin, C.-Y. C. (2010). Instability, investment, disasters, and demography: natural disasters and fertility in Italy (1820–1962) and Japan (1671–1965). Popul Environ, 31(4), 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Logan, J. (2006). The impact of Katrina: race and class in storm-damaged neighborhoods. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  59. Logan, J. (2014) Diversity and disparities. American Communities Project, Spatial Structures in the Social Sciences. Retrieved November 27, 2016, from “https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/diversity/Data/Download3.htm”.
  60. Louis, G. (2014). Persistent environmental pollutants and couple fecundity: an overview. Reproduction Reproduction, 147(4), R97–R104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Louisiana Department of. Health. (2017).2014 Birth Data. http://www.dhh.la.gov/index.cfm/page/2270 (accessed on 2/3/2017).
  62. Lovett, J. A. (2013). Tragedy or triumph in post-Katrina New Orleans? Reflections on possession, dispossession, demographic change and affordable housing. Fordham Urban Law Journal City Square, 22(2013), 22–42.Google Scholar
  63. Maralani, V. (2013). The demography of social mobility: black-white differences in the process of educational reproduction 1. Am J Sociol, 118(6), 1509–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mare, R. D. (1997). Differential fertility, intergenerational educational mobility, and racial inequality. Soc Sci Res, 26(3), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Masozera, M., Bailey, M., & Kerchner, C. (2007). Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ, 63(2), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McCarthy, K., Peterson, D., Sastry, N., & Pollard, M. (2006). The repopulation of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Report. Rand Gulf States Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  67. National Center for Health Statistics. (2012). Center for Disease Control and Prevention Natality detail Data Set, 2000-2010. Restricted-use data file and documentation. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.Google Scholar
  68. Nobles, J., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2015). The effects of mortality on fertility: population dynamics after a natural disaster. Demography, 52(1), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pais, J. F., & Elliott, J. R. (2008). Places as recovery machines: vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Social Forces, 86(4), 1415–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parekh, T. (2015). “They want to live in the Tremé, but they want it for their ways of living”: gentrification and neighborhood practice in Tremé. New Orleans Urban Geography, 36(2), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Percheski, C., & Kimbro, R. (2014). How did the great recession affect fertility? Focus, 30(2), 26–30.Google Scholar
  72. Plyer, A., & Ortiz, E. (2011). Who lives in New Orleans and the metro area now? Greater New Orleans Community Data Center, New Orleans Research Data Center. http://www.datacenterresearch.org/
  73. Plyer, A., Bonaguro, J., & Hodges, K. (2010). Using administrative data to estimate population displacement and resettlement following a catastrophic US disaster. Popul Environ, 31(1–3), 150–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Preston, S. H., & Campbell, C. (1993). Differential fertility and the distribution of traits: the case of IQ. American Journal of Sociology, 997–1019.Google Scholar
  75. Ratnayake, R., Degomme, O., & Guha-Sapir, D. (2009). Coming together to document mortality in conflict situations: proceedings of a symposium. Confl Heal, 3(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rofi, A., Doocy, S., & Robinson, C. (2006). Tsunami mortality and displacement in Aceh province, Indonesia. Disasters, 30(3), 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2015). Integrated public use microdata series: version 6.0 [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  78. Sastry, N. (2009). Displaced New Orleans residents in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: results from a pilot survey. Organization & Environment, 22(4), 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sastry, N., & Gregory, J. (2014). The location of displaced New Orleans residents in the year after Hurricane Katrina. Demography, 51, 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2009). One year later: mental illness prevalence and disparities among New Orleans residents displaced by Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health, 99(S3), S725–S731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shrinath, N., Mack, V., & Plyer, A. (2014). Who lives in New Orleans and metro parishes now? Based on 2013 US Census Bureau data. Report from The Data Center. Retrieved from http://www.DataCenterResearch.org
  82. Tong, V. T., Zotti, M. E., & Hsia, J. (2010). Impact of the Red River catastrophic flood on women giving birth in North Dakota, 1994-2000. Matern Child Health J, 15(3), 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Urban Land Institute. (2005). A strategy for rebuilding New Orleans, Louisiana. Report.Google Scholar
  84. VanLandingham, M. (2010). A second disaster tests Vietnamese American resilience on the Gulf coast. Social Science Research Council’s Items and Issues, 6(3).Google Scholar
  85. Vos, F., Rodríguez, J., Below, R., & Guha-Sapir, D. (2010). Annual disaster statistical review 2009: the numbers and trends. In Annual disaster statistical review 2009: The numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED)Google Scholar
  86. Vu, L., & Vanlandingham, M. J. (2012). Physical and mental health consequences of Katrina on Vietnamese immigrants in New Orleans: a pre- and post-disaster assessment. Journal of immigrant and minority health/Center for Minority. Public Health, 14(3), 386–394.Google Scholar
  87. Vu, L., Vanlandingham, M. J., Do, M., & Bankston, C. L. (2009). Evacuation and return of Vietnamese New Orleanians affected by Hurricane Katrina. Organization & Environment, 22(4), 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weber, L., & Peek, L. (2012). Displaced: life in the Katrina diaspora. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  89. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin, MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations