Climate, migration, and the local food security context: introducing Terra Populus

Abstract

Studies investigating the connection between environmental factors and migration are difficult to execute because they require the integration of microdata and spatial information. In this article, we introduce the novel, publically available data extraction system Terra Populus (TerraPop), which was designed to facilitate population–environment studies. We showcase the use of TerraPop by exploring variations in the climate–migration association in Burkina Faso and Senegal based on differences in the local food security context. Food security was approximated using anthropometric indicators of child stunting and wasting derived from Demographic and Health Surveys and linked to the TerraPop extract of climate and migration information. We find that an increase in heat waves was associated with a decrease in international migration from Burkina Faso, while excessive precipitation increased international moves from Senegal. Significant interactions reveal that the adverse effects of heat waves and droughts are strongly amplified in highly food insecure Senegalese departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    Geographic unit boundaries are the key to TerraPop’s location-based integration, and the system provides several types of boundaries to serve the needs of various users. For use with microdata, geographic units are regionalized to ensure that the population of each unit is >20,000 people to maintain confidentiality. TerraPop also includes both harmonized and year-specific boundaries. In the harmonized boundaries, units that have changed over time are combined to provide consistent footprints facilitating the analysis of change over time (Kugler et al. 2015). For most countries, TerraPop provides first and second administrative level boundaries.

  2. 2.

    For Burkina Faso, the DHS survey year (2003) falls within the 5-year window (2001–2006) prior to the census round in 2006. However, for Senegal the DHS survey was conducted in year 2005, three years after the census round in 2002. Although another full DHS survey was conducted in Senegal in 1997, this earlier wave did not include the relevant anthropometric indicators. We use the Senegal DHS for 2005 based on the common assumption that food security within a population is relatively static (Saha et al. 2009).

  3. 3.

    For confidentiality purposes, DHS randomly displaces rural cluster centroids between 0 and 5 km and an additional random selection of 10 % of the cluster points between 0 and 10 km, resulting in a relatively small average displacement distance of 2.45 km (Burgert et al. 2013). The random displacement algorithm ensures that centroids fall within the correct first-level administrative unit (Burgert et al. 2013). Although we aggregate points to the second-level administrative unit, the introduced uncertainty is likely minimal due to the large size of provinces/departments (most clusters are more than 5 km away from the borders). In addition, the random nature of the displacement ensures that the resulting estimates are not systematically biased.

  4. 4.

    We use the years 1961–1990 as the standard “climate normal” period recommended by the World Meteorological Organization to be used as reference period for studies of climate change and climate variability (Arguez and Vose 2011).

  5. 5.

    The wealth index combined three measures of the quality of the housing unit (material of floor, wall, roof), three measures of the type and quality of services available at the residence (type of cooking fuel, toilet type, access to electricity), and three measures to capture the possession of appliances (car, refrigerator, TV).

  6. 6.

    The models were fitted using the package lme4 (Bates 2010; Bates et al. 2014) within the R statistical environment (RCoreTeam 2015). For improved speed and more robust convergence properties, we adjusted the model settings (integer scalar setting nAGQ = 0) so that the random and fixed effects were optimized (optimizer=“bobyqa”) in the penalized iteratively reweighted least squares step (Bates et al. 2014).

References

  1. Abu, M., Codjoe, S. N. A., & Sward, J. (2014). Climate change and internal migration intentions in the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana. Population and Environment, 35(4), 341–364. doi:10.1007/s11111-013-0191-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arguez, A., & Vose, R. S. (2011). The definition of the standard WMO climate normal the key to deriving alternative climate normals. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92(6), 699–704. doi:10.1175/2010bams2955.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur, J. (1991). International labor migration patterns in west africa. African Studies Review, 34(3), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baig-Ansari, N., Rahbar, M. H., Bhutta, Z. A., & Badruddin, S. H. (2006). Child’s gender and household food insecurity are associated with stunting among young Pakistani children residing in urban squatter settlements. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 27(2), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbier, B., Yacouba, H., Karambiri, H., Zorome, M., & Some, B. (2009). Human vulnerability to climate variability in the Sahel: farmers’ adaptation strategies in Northern Burkina Faso. Environmental Management, 43(5), 790–803. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9237-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baro, M., & Deubel, T. F. (2006). Persistent hunger: Perspectives on vulnerability, famine, and food security in Sub-Saharan African. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 521–538. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bates, D. M. (2010). lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Vienna, Austria: CRAN.R-project.org.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Black, R., Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., Dercon, S., Geddes, A., & Thomas, D. S. (2011a). The effect of environmental change on human migration. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 21, S3–S11. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Black, R. E., Allen, L. H., Bhutta, Z. A., Caulfield, L. E., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M., & Rivera, J. (2008). Maternal and child undernutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet, 371(9608), 243–260. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61690-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011b). Migration as adaptation. Nature, 478(7370), 447–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Booysen, F. (2006). Out-migration in the context of the HIV/AIDS epidemic: Evidence from the Free State Province. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(4), 603–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd, R., & Ibarraran, M. E. (2009). Extreme climate events and adaptation: An exploratory analysis of drought in Mexico. Environment and Development Economics, 14, 371–395. doi:10.1017/s1355770x08004956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, S. K., & Bean, F. D. (2006). International Migration. In D. Posten & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 347–382). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, M. E., Grace, K., Shively, G., Johnson, K. B., & Carroll, M. (2014). Using satellite remote sensing and household survey data to assess human health and nutrition response to environmental change. Population and Environment, 36(1), 48–72. doi:10.1007/s11111-013-0201-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burgert, C., Colston, J., Roy, T., & Zachary, B. (2013). Geographic displacement procedure and georeferenced data release policy for the Demographic and Health Surveys. Calverton, MD: ICF International.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burney, J., Naylor, R., & Postel, S. (2013). The case for distributed irrigation as a development priority in sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(31), 12513–12517. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203597110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. CIA. (2014). The world factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper, P. J. M., Dimes, J., Rao, K. P. C., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B., & Twomlow, S. (2008). Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 126(1–2), 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, B., Winters, P., Carletto, G., Covarrubias, K., Quinones, E., Zezza, A., & DiGiuseppe, S. (2007). Rural income generating activities: A cross country comparison. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DHS. (2004). Enquete Demographique et de Sante Burkina Faso 2003 [Dataset: FR154]. Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: Institut National de la Statistique et de la Demographie Ministere de l’Economie ed du Developpement.

    Google Scholar 

  22. DHS. (2006). Enquete Demographique et de Sante Senegal 2005 [Dataset: FR177]. Dakar, Senegal: Ministere de la Sante et de la Prevention Medicale Centre de Recherche pour le Development Humain.

    Google Scholar 

  23. DHS. (2008). Demographic and Health Survey: Description of the demographic and health surveys individual recode data file [DHS IV]. Rockville, MD: ICF International.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Diffenbaugh, N. S., Swain, D. L., & Touma, D. (2015). Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(13), 3931–3936. doi:10.1073/pnas.1422385112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ezra, M., & Kiros, G.-E. (2001). Rural out-migration in the drought prone areas of Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis. International Migration Review, 35(3), 749–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng, S., & Oppenheimer, M. (2012). Applying statistical models to the climate–migration relationship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109(43), E2915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Funk, C., Rowland, J., Adoum, A., Eilerts, G., Verdin, J., & White, L. (2012). A climate trend analysis of Senegal. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fussell, E., & Massey, D. S. (2004). The limits to cumulative causation: International migration from Mexican urban areas. Demography, 41(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gray, C. L., & Bilsborrow, R. (2013). Environmental influences on human migration in rural Ecuador. Demography, 50, 1217–1241. doi:10.1007/s13524-012-0192-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gray, C. L., & Mueller, V. (2012a). Drought and population mobility in Rural Ethiopia. World Development, 40(1), 134–145. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gray, C. L., & Mueller, V. (2012b). Natural disasters and population mobility in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(16), 6000–6005. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115944109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gray, C. L., & Wise, E. (2016). Country-specific effects of climate variability on human migration. Climatic Change, 135(3), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grouzis, M., Diedhiou, I., & Rocheteau, A. (1998). Legumes diversity and root symbioses on an aridity gradient in Senegal. African Journal of Ecology, 36(2), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gutmann, M. P., & Field, V. (2010). Katrina in historical context: Environment and migration in the US. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 3–19. doi:10.1007/s11111-009-0088-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Haile, M. (2005). Weather patterns, food security and humanitarian response in sub-Saharan Africa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 360(1463), 2169–2182. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hampshire, K., & Randall, S. (1999). Seasonal labour migration strategies in the Sahel: Coping with poverty or optimising security? International Journal of Population Geography, 5(5), 367–385. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1220(199909/10)5:5<367:aid-ijpg154>3.0.co;2-o.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., & Lister, D. H. (2014). Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—The CRU TS3.10 dataset. International Journal of Climatology, 34(3), 623–642. doi:10.1002/joc.3711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Henry, S., Boyle, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2003). Modelling inter-provincial migration in Burkina Faso, West Africa: The role of socio-demographic and environmental factors. Applied Geography, 23(2–3), 115–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2002.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Henry, S., Schoumaker, B., & Beauchemin, C. (2004). The impact of rainfall on the first out-migration: A multi-level event-history analysis in Burkina Faso. Population and Environment, 25(5), 423–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hunter, L. M., Luna, J. K., & Norton, R. M. (2015). Environmental dimensions of migration. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 377–397. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hunter, L. M., Nawrotzki, R. J., Leyk, S., Maclaurin, G. J., Twine, W., Collinson, M., & Erasmus, B. (2014). Rural outmigration, natural capital, and livelihoods in South Africa. Population, Space, and Place, 20, 402–420. doi:10.1002/psp.1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hunter, L. M., & O’Neill, B. C. (2014). Enhancing engagement between the population, environment, and climate research communities: The shared socio-economic pathway process. Population and Environment, 35(3), 231–242. doi:10.1007/s11111-014-0202-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kugler, T. A., Van Riper, D. C., Manson, S. M., Haynes, D. A., Donato, J., & Stinebaugh, K. (2015). Terra Populus: Workflows for integrating and harmonizing geospatial population and environmental data. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 11(2), 180–206. doi:10.1080/15420353.2015.1036484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lobell, D. B., Hammer, G. L., McLean, G., Messina, C., Roberts, M. J., & Schlenker, W. (2013). The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nature Climate Change, 3(5), 497–501. doi:10.1038/nclimate1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration—A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mberu, B. U. (2006). Internal migration and household living conditions in Ethiopia. Demographic Research, 14(509–539), 2006. doi:10.4054/DemRes.14.21.

    Google Scholar 

  47. McGregor, J. (1994). Climate-change and involuntary migration: Implications for food security. Food Policy, 19(2), 120–132. doi:10.1016/0306-9192(94)90065-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McLeman, R. A. (2006). Migration out of 1930s—Rural Eastern Oklahoma insights for climate change research. Great Plains Quarterly, 26(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McMichael, C. (2014). Climate change and migration: Food insecurity as a driver and outcome of climate change-related migration. In A. Malik, R. Ahtar, & E. Grohmann (Eds.), Environmental deterioration and human health (pp. 291–313). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. (2008). Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22(1), 1–19. doi:10.1029/2007GB002947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. MPC. (2013). Terra Populus: Beta version [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  52. MPC. (2015). Integrated public use microdata series, international: Version 6.3 [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Munson, M. A. (2011). A study on the importance of and time spent on different modeling steps. SIGKDD Explorations, 13(2), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Myers, N. (2002). Environmental refugees: A growing phenomenon of the 21st century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 357(1420), 609–613. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nawrotzki, R. J. (2012). The politics of environmental concern: A cross-national analysis. Organization & Environment, 25(3), 286–307. doi:10.1177/1086026612456535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nawrotzki, R. J., & Bakhtsiyarava, M. (2016). International climate migration: Evidence for the climate inhibitor mechanism and the agricultural pathway. Population, Space & Place,. doi:10.1002/psp.2033.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nawrotzki, R. J., Hunter, L. M., Runfola, D. M., & Riosmena, F. (2015a). Climate change as migration driver from rural and urban Mexico. Environmental Research Letters, 10(11), 114023. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Nawrotzki, R. J., Riosmena, F., & Hunter, L. M. (2013). Do rainfall deficits predict U.S.-bound migration from rural Mexico? Evidence from the Mexican census. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(1), 129–158. doi:10.1007/s11113-012-9251-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nawrotzki, R. J., Riosmena, F., Hunter, L. M., & Runfola, D. M. (2015b). Amplification or suppression: Social networks and the climate change—migration association in rural Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 35, 463–474. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Niang, I., Ruppel, O. C., Abdrabo, M. A., Essel, A., Lennard, C., Padgham, J., & Urquhart, P. (2014). Africa. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 199–1265). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nicholson, S. E. (2001). Climatic and environmental change in Africa during the last two centuries. Climate Research, 17(2), 123–144. doi:10.3354/cr017123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Plaza, S., & Ratha, D. (2011). Diaspora for development in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. RCoreTeam. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Riosmena, F. (2009). Socioeconomic context and the association between marriage and Mexico–US migration. Social Science Research, 38(2), 324–337. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ruggles, S., King, M. L., Levison, D., McCaa, R., & Sobek, M. (2003). IPUMS-international. Historical Methods, 36(2), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Saha, K. K., Frongillo, E. A., Alam, D. S., Arifeen, S. E., Persson, L. A., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2009). Household food security is associated with growth of infants and young children in rural Bangladesh. Public Health Nutrition, 12(9), 1556–1562. doi:10.1017/s1368980009004765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Schatz, E., Gomez-Olive, X., Ralston, M., Menken, J., & Tollman, S. (2012). The impact of pensions on health and wellbeing in rural South Africa: Does gender matter? Social Science and Medicine, 75(10), 1864–1873. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Schlenker, W., & Roberts, M. J. (2009). Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to US crop yields under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(37), 15594–15598. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906865106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Schneider, A., Friedl, M., & Potere, D. (2009). A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environmental Research Letters, 4(4), 1–11. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sinatti, G. (2009). Home is where the heart abides: Migration, return and housing in Dakar, Senegal. Open House International, 34(3), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sinatti, G. (2011). ‘Mobile transmigrants’ or ‘unsettled returnees’? Myth of return and permanent resettlement among Senegalese migrants. Population Space and Place, 17(2), 153–166. doi:10.1002/psp.608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sinatti, G. (2014). Masculinities and intersectionality in migration: Transnational wolof migrants negotiating manhood and gendered family roles. In T. Thanh-Dam, D. Gasper, H. Jeff, & S. Bergh (Eds.), Migration, gender and social justice (pp. 215–226). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  74. Smidt, C. (2003). Religion as social capital: Producing the common good. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. American Economic Review, 75(2), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Stern, N. (2007). Economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. Sullivan Robinson, R., Meier, A., Trinitapoli, J., & Svec, J. (2014). Integrating the demographic and health surveys, IPUMS-I, and Terra Populus to explore mortality and health outcomes at the district level in Ghana, Malawi, and Tanzania. African Population Studies, 28(2), 917–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Taylor, J. E., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Massey, D. S., & Pellegrino, A. (1996). International migration and community development. Population Index, 62(3), 397–418. doi:10.2307/3645924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Taylor, E. J., & Martin, P. L. (2001). Human capital: Migration and rural population change. In B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  80. UNDP. (2014). Human development report 2014. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  81. UNPD. (2012). World population prospect (2012 revisions): Glossary of demographic terms. New York, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ward, P. S., & Shively, G. E. (2015). Migration and land rental as responses to income shocks in rural China. Pacific Economic Review, 20(4), 511–543. doi:10.1111/1468-0106.12072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Waterlow, J. C., Buzina, R., Keller, W., Lane, J. M., Nichaman, M. Z., & Tanner, J. M. (1977). The presentation and use of height and weight data for comparing the nutritional status of groups of children under the age 10 years. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 55(4), 489–498.

    Google Scholar 

  84. WFP, & CDC. (2005). Measuring and interpreting malnutrition and mortality. Rome: Wold Food Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  85. WHO. (1983). Measuring change in nutritional status. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wodon, Q., Burger, N., Grant, A., Joseph, G., Liverani, A., & Tkacheva, O. (2014). Climate change, extreme weather events, and migration: Review of the literature for five Arab countries. In E. Piguet & F. Laczko (Eds.), People on the move in a changing climate (pp. 111–135). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Minnesota Population Center (#R24 HD041023), funded through grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). In addition, this work received support from the National Science Foundation funded Terra Populus project (NSF Award ACI-0940818). The authors wish to acknowledge the statistical offices that provided the underlying data making this research possible: National Institute of Statistics and Demography, Burkina Faso, and National Agency of Statistics and Demography, Senegal. We express our gratitude to Joshua Donato and David Haynes for help with the construction of the spatial variables. Special thanks to the journal editor and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphael J. Nawrotzki.

Appendices

Appendix A: Case

Burkina Faso and Senegal are among the poorest countries of the world, ranking 181 (Burkina Faso), and 163 (Senegal) out of 187 on the human development index (UNDP 2014). In rural areas, households depend heavily on agricultural production for sustenance and income generation (Davis et al. 2007). In Burkina Faso about 90 % and in Senegal about 78 % of the labor force is employed in the agricultural sector (CIA 2014). The low development level and associated constraints in financial resources hinder the use of technology to guard against adverse climatic impacts (Gutmann and Field 2010). For example, only 0.2 and 1.3 % of cropland is irrigated in Burkina Faso and Senegal, respectively (CIA 2014). The confluence of high agricultural dependence and low technological development renders households vulnerable to climate impacts.

Burkina Faso and Senegal are located in the semiarid Sahelian region of Western Africa. Both countries are characterized by a distinct North–South gradient of temperature and precipitation (Grouzis et al. 1998; Hampshire and Randall 1999). While the northern Sahelian areas are generally hot and arid, the southern regions are relatively cooler and more humid, making farm production more lucrative (Henry et al. 2003, 2004). Since the 1960s, West Africa has experienced a long-term reduction in rainfall and a warming in temperatures (Funk et al. 2012; Nicholson 2001). These historical trends are projected to continue in future decades as a result of global climate change (Niang et al. 2014), making this region an important geographical location for the study of climate impacts on rural livelihoods.

Burkina Faso and Senegal have a rich history of diverse migration patterns within and across national boundaries. International outmigration is generally employment related, and most migration is directed to neighboring countries on the African continent. For Burkina Faso, the primary destinations include Nigeria, Ghana, and Ivory Coast (Arthur 1991), while Senegalese labor migrants often seek employment in Mauritania and Gabon but also in Italy and Spain (Plaza and Ratha 2011; Sinatti 2011). Due to employment in the manual construction and agricultural sectors, these labor migrant streams are characterized by a distinct demographic profile, largely comprised of young males (Henry et al. 2003; Plaza and Ratha 2011; Sinatti 2014). Labor migration is often temporary and circular in nature and migrants usually return to their village of origin after a saving target has been reached (Sinatti 2009).

Appendix B: Base model

International migration is a process influenced by various sociodemographic determinants (Brown and Bean 2006), and our multivariate base model accounts for these factors (Table 4).

Table 4 Multilevel base model predicting the odds of international migration from rural households in Burkina Faso and Senegal

The factors influencing international migration from Burkina Faso and Senegal show considerable similarity. In line with prior research from Ghana, South Africa, and Mexico, we find that the typical migrant household is relatively large (Abu et al. 2014), is relatively wealthy in terms of home ownership and physical assets (Hunter et al. 2014), and has good access to established migrant networks (Fussell and Massey 2004). In addition, an increase in the proportion of retirees was associated with higher odds of international migration, probably related to the added income from old-age pensions that may help finance an international move as demonstrated for rural South Africa (Schatz et al. 2012). Marital status and religious affiliation influence the odds of international migration from Burkina Faso but not from Senegal, with a lower probability of international migration from Muslim households in which the head was married, comparable to findings from rural Ethiopia and Mexico (Ezra and Kiros 2001; Riosmena 2009). In contrast, international migrants from Senegal are more likely to originate from regions with limited access to urban infrastructure and limited production of the primary crops. Finally, the directionality of the effect of age of the household head, child dependency ratio, and proportion of household members employed varied between countries as a result of the country-specific sociopolitical context.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nawrotzki, R.J., Schlak, A.M. & Kugler, T.A. Climate, migration, and the local food security context: introducing Terra Populus. Popul Environ 38, 164–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-016-0260-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Climate
  • Environment
  • International migration
  • Burkina Faso
  • Senegal
  • Food security
  • Terra Populus
  • Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)