Population and Environment

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 293–312 | Cite as

Natural disasters and local demographic change in the United States

Original Paper

Abstract

Classic studies on local demographic consequences of natural disasters in the United States are now more than 30 years old, raising questions about how and to what extent relevant patterns have changed over intervening years, as the number and cost of recorded environmental hazards have increased. This study examines these questions at the county level for the nation as a whole, using recent census and hazards data in conjunction with statistical methods that account for spatial dependencies among neighboring counties. Results indicate a positive correlation between cumulative disaster impact during the 1990s and changes in local population and housing units; they also reveal patterns of increased socioeconomic polarization among local residents. These findings differ from earlier studies and put recent case studies in broader context, suggesting that current disaster recoveries contribute to the growth of larger and more unequal populations in environmentally hazardous places.

Keywords

Environmental hazards Natural disasters Demographic change Socioeconomic inequality 

References

  1. Anselin, L., & Berra, A. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 255–258). New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, B. J. (1999). US government natural disaster assistance: Historical analysis and a proposal for the future. Disasters, 23(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, J. M. (1998). Rising tide: The great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, F. L., Fogleman, C. W., Parenton, V. J., Pittman, R. H., & Tracy, G. S. (1963). The social and psychological consequences of a natural disaster: A longitudinal study of Hurricane Audrey. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  5. Belasen, A. R., & Polachek, S. W. (2009). How disasters affect local labor markets: The effects of Hurricanes in Florida. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Brunsma, D. L., Overfelt, D., & Picou, J. S. (2010). The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, L. (2005). Worst cases: Terror and catastrophe in the population imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Cochrane, H. C. (1975). Natural hazards and their distributive effects. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavior Science Monograph #NSF-RA-E-75-003.Google Scholar
  11. Cutter, S., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dacy, D. C., & Kunreuther, H. (1969). The economics of natural disasters: Implications for federal policy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dash, N., Morrow, B. H., Mainster, J., & Cunningham, L. (2007). Lasting effects of Hurricane Andrew on a working-class community. Natural Hazards Review, 8(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dauber, M. L. (2005). The sympathetic state. Law and History Review, 23(2), 387–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douty, C. M. (1977). The economics of localized disasters. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  16. Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dynes, R. R. (2000). The Lisbon earthquake of 1755: Contested meanings in the first modern disaster. TsuInfo Alert, 2, 10–18.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, J., & Frickel, S. (2011). Environmental dimensions of urban change: Uncovering relict industrial waste sites and subsequent land use conversions in Portland and New Orleans. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2011). Declared disasters by year. Available from http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema. Accessed July 2011.
  20. Foster, J. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disaster in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friesema, H. P., Caporaso, J. A., Goldstein, G., Lineberry, R., & McMcleary, R. (1977). Community impacts of natural disasters. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fussell, E., & Elliott, J. R. (2009). Social organization of demographic responses to disaster: Studying population-environment interactions in the case of Hurricane Katrina. Organization & Environment, 22(4), 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garrett, T. A., & Sobel, R. S. (2003). The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.Google Scholar
  26. Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2010). Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography, 47(4), 821–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gutmann, M., & Field, V. (2010). Katrina in historical context: Environment and migration in the U.S. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haas, J. E., Kates, R. W., & Bowden, M. J. (1977). Reconstruction following a disaster. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton, L. C. (2009). Statistics with Stata. Florence, KY: Cengage.Google Scholar
  31. Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (2010). The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, Version 8.0. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina. Available from http://www.sheldus.org.
  32. Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of risk: A geographic introduction to disasters. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). (2008). Fiscal year 2008 budget summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  34. Hunter, L. M. (1998). The association between environmental risk and internal migration flows. Population and Environment, 19(3), 247–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26(4), 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, A., Anglin, R. V., Mizelle, R. M., Jr, & Plyer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Resilience and opportunity: Lessons from the U.S. Gulf Coast after Katrina and Rita. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  37. Melosi, M. (2010). Humans, cities, and nature: How do cities fit in the material world? Journal of Urban History, 36(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moss, D. (1999). Courting disaster? The transformation of federal disaster policy since 1803. In K. A. Froot (Ed.), The financing of catastrophe risk (pp. 307–362). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  39. Mullener, E. (2005). A sister city flourishes. New Orleans: Times-Picayune.Google Scholar
  40. Myers, C., Slack, T., & Singelmann, J. (2008). Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment, 29(6), 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2011). U.S. Sets record with a dozen billion-dollar weather disasters in one year. Available at: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20111207_novusstats.html. Accessed 15 December 2011.
  42. Oliver-Smith, A. (1998). Global changes and the definition of disaster. In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question (pp. 179–196). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Pais, J., & Elliott, J. R. (2008). Places as recovery machines: Vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Social Forces, 86(4), 1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Perrow, C. (2007). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  46. Plyer, A., Bonaguro, J., & Hodges, K. (2010). Using administrative data to estimate population displacement and resettlement following a catastrophic U.S. disaster. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 150–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quarantelli, E. L. (1998). What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Solnit, R. (2009). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  49. Stallings, R. A. (2002). Weberian political sociology and sociological disaster studies. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinberg, T. (2006). Acts of god: The unnatural history of natural disaster in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Stringfield, J. (2010). Higher ground: An exploratory analysis of characteristics affecting returning populations after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tierney, K. (2006). Facing hazards and disasters understanding human dimensions. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Census Bureau. (nd). Decennials - census of population and housing. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/.. Accessed May 2011.
  54. Verardi, V., & Croux, C. (2008). Robust regression in Stata. Available via SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1369144. Accessed 3 May 2011.
  55. Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County child poverty rates in the US: A spatial regression approach. Population Research Policy Review, 25, 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, J. D., & Rossi, P. H. (1981). Social science & natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.Google Scholar
  57. Wright, J. D., Rossi, P. H., Wright, S. R., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1979). After the clean-up: Long-range effects of natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. York, R., Rosa, E., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zack, N. (2010). Ethics for disaster. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations