Skip to main content

Natural disasters and local demographic change in the United States

Abstract

Classic studies on local demographic consequences of natural disasters in the United States are now more than 30 years old, raising questions about how and to what extent relevant patterns have changed over intervening years, as the number and cost of recorded environmental hazards have increased. This study examines these questions at the county level for the nation as a whole, using recent census and hazards data in conjunction with statistical methods that account for spatial dependencies among neighboring counties. Results indicate a positive correlation between cumulative disaster impact during the 1990s and changes in local population and housing units; they also reveal patterns of increased socioeconomic polarization among local residents. These findings differ from earlier studies and put recent case studies in broader context, suggesting that current disaster recoveries contribute to the growth of larger and more unequal populations in environmentally hazardous places.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Anselin, L., & Berra, A. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 255–258). New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B. J. (1999). US government natural disaster assistance: Historical analysis and a proposal for the future. Disasters, 23(2), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. M. (1998). Rising tide: The great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, F. L., Fogleman, C. W., Parenton, V. J., Pittman, R. H., & Tracy, G. S. (1963). The social and psychological consequences of a natural disaster: A longitudinal study of Hurricane Audrey. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belasen, A. R., & Polachek, S. W. (2009). How disasters affect local labor markets: The effects of Hurricanes in Florida. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsma, D. L., Overfelt, D., & Picou, J. S. (2010). The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (2005). Worst cases: Terror and catastrophe in the population imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, H. C. (1975). Natural hazards and their distributive effects. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavior Science Monograph #NSF-RA-E-75-003.

  • Cutter, S., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacy, D. C., & Kunreuther, H. (1969). The economics of natural disasters: Implications for federal policy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, N., Morrow, B. H., Mainster, J., & Cunningham, L. (2007). Lasting effects of Hurricane Andrew on a working-class community. Natural Hazards Review, 8(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauber, M. L. (2005). The sympathetic state. Law and History Review, 23(2), 387–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douty, C. M. (1977). The economics of localized disasters. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R. R. (2000). The Lisbon earthquake of 1755: Contested meanings in the first modern disaster. TsuInfo Alert, 2, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J., & Frickel, S. (2011). Environmental dimensions of urban change: Uncovering relict industrial waste sites and subsequent land use conversions in Portland and New Orleans. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2011). Declared disasters by year. Available from http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema. Accessed July 2011.

  • Foster, J. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disaster in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32, 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesema, H. P., Caporaso, J. A., Goldstein, G., Lineberry, R., & McMcleary, R. (1977). Community impacts of natural disasters. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E., & Elliott, J. R. (2009). Social organization of demographic responses to disaster: Studying population-environment interactions in the case of Hurricane Katrina. Organization & Environment, 22(4), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 20–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, T. A., & Sobel, R. S. (2003). The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2010). Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography, 47(4), 821–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, M., & Field, V. (2010). Katrina in historical context: Environment and migration in the U.S. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, J. E., Kates, R. W., & Bowden, M. J. (1977). Reconstruction following a disaster. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. C. (2009). Statistics with Stata. Florence, KY: Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (2010). The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, Version 8.0. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina. Available from http://www.sheldus.org.

  • Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of risk: A geographic introduction to disasters. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). (2008). Fiscal year 2008 budget summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. M. (1998). The association between environmental risk and internal migration flows. Population and Environment, 19(3), 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26(4), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A., Anglin, R. V., Mizelle, R. M., Jr, & Plyer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Resilience and opportunity: Lessons from the U.S. Gulf Coast after Katrina and Rita. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melosi, M. (2010). Humans, cities, and nature: How do cities fit in the material world? Journal of Urban History, 36(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. (1999). Courting disaster? The transformation of federal disaster policy since 1803. In K. A. Froot (Ed.), The financing of catastrophe risk (pp. 307–362). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullener, E. (2005). A sister city flourishes. New Orleans: Times-Picayune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C., Slack, T., & Singelmann, J. (2008). Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment, 29(6), 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2011). U.S. Sets record with a dozen billion-dollar weather disasters in one year. Available at: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20111207_novusstats.html. Accessed 15 December 2011.

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1998). Global changes and the definition of disaster. In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question (pp. 179–196). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, J., & Elliott, J. R. (2008). Places as recovery machines: Vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Social Forces, 86(4), 1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (2007). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plyer, A., Bonaguro, J., & Hodges, K. (2010). Using administrative data to estimate population displacement and resettlement following a catastrophic U.S. disaster. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 150–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1998). What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, R. (2009). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R. A. (2002). Weberian political sociology and sociological disaster studies. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, T. (2006). Acts of god: The unnatural history of natural disaster in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, J. (2010). Higher ground: An exploratory analysis of characteristics affecting returning populations after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K. (2006). Facing hazards and disasters understanding human dimensions. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (nd). Decennials - census of population and housing. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/.. Accessed May 2011.

  • Verardi, V., & Croux, C. (2008). Robust regression in Stata. Available via SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1369144. Accessed 3 May 2011.

  • Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County child poverty rates in the US: A spatial regression approach. Population Research Policy Review, 25, 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. D., & Rossi, P. H. (1981). Social science & natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. D., Rossi, P. H., Wright, S. R., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1979). After the clean-up: Long-range effects of natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, N. (2010). Ethics for disaster. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Schultz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schultz, J., Elliott, J.R. Natural disasters and local demographic change in the United States. Popul Environ 34, 293–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-012-0171-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-012-0171-7

Keywords

  • Environmental hazards
  • Natural disasters
  • Demographic change
  • Socioeconomic inequality