Population and Environment

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 370–399 | Cite as

The impacts of climate variability on household welfare in rural Mexico

Original Paper

Abstract

In light of the expected increase in weather variability from climate change, we examine the impact of weather shocks, defined as rainfall or growing degree days more than a standard deviation from their respective long-run means, on household consumption per capita. The analyses suggest that both rainfall and temperature shocks affect both food and non-food consumption. Furthermore, the results show that a household’s ability to protect its consumption from weather shocks depends on the climate region and when in the agricultural year the shock occurs. Especially, households in arid climates are not fully protected from weather shocks occurring during the beginning of the wet season (April, May, June). The results highlight the necessity to account for the underlying climatic variation as well as to carefully define the shocks.

Keywords

Climate change Weather shocks Household welfare Consumption Food security Rural Mexico Livelihoods Environment 

JEL Classification

D13 I31 Q54 Q12 

References

  1. Appendini, K., & Liverman, D. (1994). Agricultural policy, climate change and food security in Mexico. Food Policy, 19(2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cochrane, J. H. (1991). A simple test of consumption insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 957–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conde, C., Liverman, D., Flores, M., Ferrer, R., Araújo, R., Betancourt, E., et al. (1997). Vulnerability of rainfed maize crops in Mexico to climate change. Climate Research, 9, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conroy, H. V. (2009). Sources of welfare disparities across regions in Mexico. In E. Skoufias & G. Lopez-Acevedo (Eds.), Determinants of regional welfare disparities within Latin American countries (pp. 35–96). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  5. De la Fuente, A. (2010). Remittances and vulnerability to poverty in rural Mexico. World Development, 38(6), 828–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deaton, A. (1992). Understanding consumption. Carendon lectures in economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dercon, S., & Krishnan, P. (2000). Vulnerability, seasonality, and poverty in Ethiopia. Journal of Development Studies, 36(6), 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deschênes, O., & Greenstone, M. (2007). The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. The American Economic Review, 97(1), 354–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eakin, H. (2000). Smallholder maize production and climatic risk: A case study from Mexico. Climatic Change, 45, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraisse, J., Bellow, J., & Brown, C. (ND). Degree days: Heating, cooling, and growing. Accessed at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ae428, on February 15, 2011.
  11. Galindo, L. M. (2009). La economía del cambio climático en México: Síntesis. Accessed on the web August 16, 2010. http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/informacionambiental/Publicacion/Sintesis2009cambioclimatico.pdf.
  12. Garcia-Verdu, R. (2002). Risk-sharing in rural Mexico. Unpublished manuscript, Banco de Mexico, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  13. Harrower, S., & Hoddinott, J. (2005). Consumption smoothing in the Zone Lacustre, Mali. Journal of African Economies, 14(4), 489–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. INEGI. (2007). Censo Agricola, Ganadero y Forestal.Google Scholar
  15. INEGI. (2009). Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Accessed on the web April 25, 2011 at http://mapserver.inegi.org.mx/dsist/prontuario/index2.cfm.
  16. IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jacoby, H., & Skoufias, E. (1997). Risk, financial markets, and human capital in a developing country. Review of Economic Studies, 64(3), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacoby, H., & Skoufias, E. (1998). Testing theories of consumption behavior using information on aggregate shocks: Income seasonality and rainfall in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kochar, A. (1999). Smoothing consumption by smoothing income: Hours-of-work_ responses to idiosyncratic agricultural shocks in rural India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(1), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mace, B. (1991). Full insurance in the presence of aggregate uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 928–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morduch, J. (1995). Income smoothing and consumption smoothing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neild, R. E., Newman, J. E. (ND). Growing season characteristics and requirements in the Corn Belt. Accessed on the web at http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/NCH/NCH-40.html on September, 10, 2010.
  23. Paxson, C. (1992). Using weather variability to estimate the response of savings to transitory income in Thailand. American Economic Review, 82(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Binswanger, H. (1993). Wealth, weather risk, and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments. Economic Journal, 103(1), 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubalcava, L., & Teruel, G. (2006). User’s guide for the Mexican family life survey first wave. Accessed on the web on April 25, 2010 at http://www.mxfls.uia.mx.
  26. Schlenker, W., & Roberts, M. (2008). Estimating the impact of climate change on crop yields: The importance of nonlinear temperature effects. NBER Working Paper, number 13799.Google Scholar
  27. Shepard, D. (1968). A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proceedings of the ACM national conference (pp. 517–524).Google Scholar
  28. Skoufias, E. (2007). Poverty alleviation and consumption insurance: Evidence from PROGRESA in Mexico. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(4), 630–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skoufias, E., Essama-Nssah, B., Katayama, R. S. (2011a). Too little too late: Welfare impacts of rainfall shocks in rural Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5615, March 2011, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Skoufias, E., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2005). Consumption insurance and vulnerability to poverty: A synthesis of the evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Mali, Mexico and Russia. The European Journal of Development Research, 17(1), 24–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skoufias, E., & Vinha, K. (2011). Climate variability and child height in rural Mexico. Economics & Human Biology (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  32. Skoufias, E., Vinha, K., & Conroy, H. V. (2011b). The impacts of climate variability on household welfare in rural Mexico. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5555, January 2011, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. The Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperative Extension. (ND). Growing degree days & crop water use. University of Nebraska-Lincoln http://www.ianr.unl.edu/cropwatch/weather/gdd-et.html. Accessed July 22, 2010.
  34. Thomas, T., Christiaensen, L., Trung, L. D., Do, Q. T. (2010). Natural disasters and household welfareevidence from Vietnam. Mimeo. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. Townsend, R. (1994). Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica, 62(3), 539–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Townsend, R. (1995). Consumption insurance: An evaluation of risk-bearing systems in low income economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(Summer), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Udry, C. (1994). Risk and insurance in a rural credit market: An empirical investigation in northern nigeria. Review of Economic Studies, 6, 495–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilkinson, P. (Ed.). (2006). Environmental epidemiology. Maidenhead (England): Open University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología de Agua. (ND). Eric III—extractor rápido de información climatológica V. II. Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología de Agua.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The World BankWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Consultant at the World BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations