Gender, political ideology, and climate change beliefs in an extractive industry community
This paper presents results from a survey on attitudes toward climate change in Alberta, Canada, home to just 10% of Canada’s population, but the source of 35% of the country’s greenhouse-gas emissions (Environment Canada 2011). Results show high levels of awareness, but much lower levels of perceived climate change impacts for one’s self or region. Women expressed significantly greater awareness and sense of perceived impacts about climate change than men; however, gender differences appear predominantly associated with socioeconomic factors. Indeed, in all, political ideology had the strongest predictive value, with individuals voting for the conservative party significantly less likely to anticipate significant societal climate change impacts. This finding, in turn, is strongly associated with beliefs regarding whether climate change is human induced. Particularly notable is the finding that the gender gap in climate change beliefs and perceived impacts is not attributed to gendered social roles, as indicated by occupational and familial status. Instead, gender distinctions appear to be related to the lower tendency for women to ascribe to a conservative political ideology relative to men.
KeywordsClimate change Gender Political ideology Environmental concern Attitudes Beliefs Alberta, Canada
- Apter, T. (1994). Working women don’t have wives: Professional success in the 1990’s. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1989). Environmental issues and women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 90(3), 586–593.Google Scholar
- Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 841–858.Google Scholar
- Bottero, W. (2000). Gender and the labour market at the turn of the century: Complexity, ambiguity and change. Work, Employment & Society, 14(4), 781–791.Google Scholar
- Cecil, B., Diaz, P., Gauthier, D., Piwowar, J., & Sauchyn, D. (2005). Social dimensions of the impact of climate change on water supply and use in the City of Regina. Regina: The Centre for Sustainable Communities and the Canadian Plains Research Centre, University of Regina.Google Scholar
- Desvouges, W. H., Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P., & Rosa, E. A. (1993). Perceived risk and attitudes toward nuclear wastes: National and Nevada perspectives. In R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft, & E. A. Rosa (Eds.), Public reactions to nuclear waste: Citizens’ views of repository siting (pp. 175–208). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Downing, P., & Ballantyne, J. (2007). Tipping point or turning point? Ipsos-Mori social research institute. http://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/reports/IPSOS_MORI_turning-point-or-tipping-point.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2011.
- Environment Canada. (2011). National inventory report 1990–2009: Greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada. Available at http://www.ec.gc.ca/Publications/. Accessed October 12, 2011.
- Eurobarometer. (2009). Special Eurobarometer 300. Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Government of Alberta. (2007). A workforce strategy for Alberta’s energy sector. Available online at http://employment.alberta.ca/documents/WIA/WIA-BETW_energy_strategy.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2010.
- Government of Alberta. (2011). Alberta economic quick facts. Available at http://albertacanada.com/documents/SP-EH_AlbertaEconomicQuickFacts.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2011.
- Kasperson, R. E., & Kasperson, J. X. (1991). Hidden hazards. In D. G. Mayo & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management (pp. 9–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lindsey, L. L. (1997). Gender roles: A sociological perspective (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Lorenzoni, L. (2003). Present Choices, Future Climates: A cross-cultural study of perceptions in Italy and in the UK. Doctoral Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
- Lorenzoni, I., Lowe, T., & Pidgeon, N. (2005a). A strategic assessment of scientific and behavioural perspectives on ‘dangerous’ climate change. Norwich, UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Technical Report 28.Google Scholar
- Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming’s six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. Yale project on climate change and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/pdf/6americas.pdf.
- McStay, J. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1983). Male-female differences in concern for environmental quality. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 6(4), 291–301.Google Scholar
- Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R. C. (1984). Rationality and irrationality in the public’s perception of nuclear power. In W. R. Freudenburg & E. A. Rosa (Eds.), Public reactions toward nuclear power: Are there critical masses? (pp. 137–179). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center (Pew). (2009). Fewer Americans see solid evidence of global warming. http://people-press.org/report/556/global-warming.
- Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Public perceptions of risk, science and governance. Main findings of a British survey on five risk cases. Technical Report. Norwich: Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P. (2000). In R. E. Löfstedt (Eds.), The perception of risk. Risk and society policy series. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
- Spence, A., Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., & Demski, C. (2010). Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted in January–March 2010. Technical Report (Understanding risk working paper 10-01). Cardiff: School of Psychology.Google Scholar
- Statistics Canada. (2006). Census of Canada. Available at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/profiles/community. Accessed September 29, 2008.
- Stedman, R. C., Davidson, D. J., & Wellstead, A. (2004). Risk and climate change: perceptions of key policy actors in Canada. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1393–1404.Google Scholar
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.Google Scholar
- Stout-Wiegand, N., & Trent, R. B. (1983). Sex differences in attitudes toward new energy resource developments. Rural Sociology, 48(4), 637–646.Google Scholar
- Upham, P., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Purdam, K., Darnton, A., McLachlan, C., Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Public attitudes to environmental change: A selective review of theory and practice. A research synthesis for the living with environmental change programme, Research Councils UK. www.lwec.org.uk.
- Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change (in press).Google Scholar