Skip to main content

The role of intergenerational transfers, land, and education in fertility transition in rural Kenya: the case of Nyeri district

Abstract

This qualitative study reveals how population pressures, land availability, inheritance norms, and educational opportunities intertwine to influence fertility decline in rural Kenya. Focus group discussions with men and women whose childbearing occurred both before and after the onset of rapid, unexpected fertility transition in Nyeri, Kenya allowed individuals who actually participated in, or witnessed, the fertility transition to “voice” their perceptions as to the mechanisms underlying the transition. Findings suggest that, since land inheritance is a cultural norm, land scarcity and diminishing farm size often influence fertility decision-making and behavior via preferences for fewer children. Further, education does not appear to be the driving cause of fertility behavior change, but rather is adopted as a substitute for land inheritance when land resources are scarce. These findings have implications for our understanding of fertility behavior as well as for improving predictions of fertility transition in other rural sub-Saharan African contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • African Population and Health Research Center. (1998). Fertility decline in Kenya: Levels, trends, and differentials. Nairobi: The African Population and Health Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agadjanian, V. (2005). Fraught with ambivalence: Reproductive intentions and contraceptive choices in a sub-Saharan fertility transition. Population Research and Policy Review, 24(6), 617–645. doi:10.1007/s11113-005-5096-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility transition. American Sociological Review, 66, 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddlecom, A. E., Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2005). Environmental effects on family size preferences and subsequent reproductive behavior in Nepal. Population and Environment, 26(3), 583–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. (2003). Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: The role of educational differences and fertility preferences. Population Studies, 57(3), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. (1977). The economic activities of children in a village in Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 3(3), 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1980). Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline. Population and Development Review, 6(2), 225–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C., Khuda, B. E., Caldwell, B., Pieris, I., & Caldwell, P. (1999). The Bangladesh fertility decline: An interpretation. Population and Development Review, 25(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C., Orubuloye, I., & Caldwell, P. (1992). Fertility decline in Africa: A new type of transition? Population and Development Review, 18(2), 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. L., Pan, W. K. Y., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2006). Declining fertility on the frontier: The Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28, 17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Martin, T. (1995). Women’s education and fertility: Results from 26 demographic and health surveys. Studies in Family Planning, 26, 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, D. C., & Johnson, N. E. (1992). Size of farm or size of family: Which comes first? Population Studies, 46(3), 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, S. H., & Farid, S. M. (1985). Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa: Levels and their explanation. World Bank, 85–13. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D., McCord, G. C., & Sachs, J. D. (2007). Africa’s lagging demographic transition: Evidence from exogenous impacts of malaria ecology and agricultural technology. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 12892.

  • De Sherbinin, A., Carr, D. L., Cassels, S., & Jang, L. (2007). Population and natural resources. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(5), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLancey, V. (1990). Socioeconomic consequences of high fertility for the family. In G. T. F. Acsadi, G. J. Acsadi, & R. A. Bulatao (Eds.), Population growth and reproduction in sub Saharan Africa: Technical analyses of fertility and its consequences (pp. 115–130). Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R. (1993). Population policies and women’s rights. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N. A., & Frost, A. (2008). Gender in African population research: The fertility/reproductive health example. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doveri, A. (2000). Land, fertility, and family: A selected review of the literature in historical demography. Genus, LVI(3–4), 19–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, T. E., & Werner, L. H. (1983). Prospects for fertility decline in rural Kenya. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1976). Factors in the decline of farm family fertility in the United States: Some preliminary research results. The Journal of American History, 63(3), 600–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins, E. M. (1985). The fertility revolution: A supply-demand analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erulkar, A. S. (2004). The experience of sexual coercion among young people in Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 30(4), 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshiwani, G. S. (1990). Implementing educational policies in Kenya. World Bank Discussion Papers, No. 85. Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • Estudillo, J. P., Quisumbing, A. R., & Otsuka, K. (2001). Gender differences in land inheritance and schooling investments in the Rural Philippines. Land Economics, 77(1), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garenne, M., & Joseph, V. (2002). The timing of the fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 30(10), 1835–1843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, D. J., & Hoelter, L. F. (2007). Land use and first birth timing in an agricultural setting. Population and Environment, 28, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerslough, C. R. (1992). Proximity to contraceptive services and fertility transition in rural Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 18(2), 54–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1955). Rural fertility in central Luzon. American Sociological Review, 20(1), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (1985). Child fosterage in West Africa. Population and Development Review, 11(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, T. S., Yamano, T., Weber, M. T., Tschirley, D., Benfica, R., Chapoto, A., et al. (2003). Smallholder income and land distribution in Africa: Implications for poverty reduction strategies. Food Policy, 28(3), 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy and reproductive behaviour: Experience from developing countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kask, S., & Kenzer, M. (1993). The geo-economics of Kenya. In M. Azevedo (Ed.), Kenya: The land the people and the nation (pp. 61–79). Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya Land Alliance. (2001). Land use in Kenya: The case for a national land use policy. Nakuru: Kenya Land Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyatta, J. M. (1965). Facing Mount Kenya. New York: Random House Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilson, M. L. (1955). Land and the Kikuyu: A study of the relationship between land and Kikuyu political movements. The Journal of Negro History, 40(2), 103–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D., & Duryea, S. (1999). Effects of schooling on fertility, labor supply, and investments in children, with evidence from Brazil. Journal of Human Resources, 24, 160–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D., & Kramer, K. L. (2002). Children’s economic roles in the Maya family life cycle: Cain, Caldwell, and Chayanov revisited. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leo, C. (1984). Land and class in Kenya. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinwa-Adebusoye, P. (1994). Changes in the costs and benefits of children to their parents. In T. Locoh & V. Hertrich (Eds.), The Onset of fertility transition in sub Saharan Africa (pp. 175–192). Liege, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencarini, L. (2000). A note on landholding and fertility in rural South Africa. Genus, LVI(3–4), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, B. S., & Lloyd, C. B. (1998). Gender differences in the schooling experiences of adolescents in low-income countries: The case of Kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 29(2), 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick, T. W. (1978). Fertility and land availability in rural Brazil. Demography, 15(3), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, M., & Tiffen, M. (1994). Population growth and a sustainable environment. Environment, 36(8), 10–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, E. (1976). The economic value of children in peasant agriculture. In R. G. Ridker (Ed.), Population and development: The search for selective interventions (pp. 98–153). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngome, C. (2003). Kenya. In D. Teferra & P. G. Albach (Eds.), African higher education: An international reference handbook (pp. 359–371). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orvis, S. (1997). The agrarian question in Kenya. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.

  • Oucho, J. O. (2000). Demographic implications of population distribution, density and movement within Kenya’s arable lands. In R. A. Obudho & J. B. Ojwang (Eds.), Issues in resource management and development in Kenya (pp. 195–202). Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovuka, M. (2000). Land use changes in central Kenya from the 1950s: A possibility to generalize? GeoJournal, 51, 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Population and Reference Bureau (2008). 2008 World Population Data Sheet. Retrieved 2 January, 2009, from http://www.prb.org/pdf08/08WPDS_Eng.pdf.

  • Price, N. (1996). The changing value of children among the Kikuyu of Central Province, Kenya. Africa, 66, 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QSR-NUD*IST. (1997). QSR-NUD*IST 4 software for qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing, A., Estudillo, J. P., & Otsuka, K. (2004). Land and schooling: Transferring wealth across generations. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. C. (1992). Kenya enters the fertility transition. Population Studies, 46(3), 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutjer, W. A., Stokes, C. S., & Poindexter, J. R. (1983). Farm size, land ownership, and fertility in rural Egypt. Land Economics, 59(4), 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchudi, J. M. (2001). Spouses’ socioeconomic characteristics and fertility differences in sub-Saharan Africa: Does spouse’s education matter? Journal of Biosocial Science, 33(4), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanLandingham, M., & Hirschman, C. (2001). Population pressure and fertility in pre-transition Thailand. Population Studies, 55(3), 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Partial support for this research was provided by a grant to the Penn State Population Research Institute from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and core support to PRI from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant No. 1 R24 HD41025). An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, 31 March–2 April. The authors thank Gloria Chepngeno for assistance with the data analysis and the African Population and Health Research Center for their research support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina M. Shreffler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shreffler, K.M., Nii-Amoo Dodoo, F. The role of intergenerational transfers, land, and education in fertility transition in rural Kenya: the case of Nyeri district. Popul Environ 30, 75–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0077-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0077-1

Keywords

  • Fertility 
  • Land
  • Education
  • Demographic transition
  • Kenya
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Intergenerational transfers