Abstract
Understanding the relationships among perceptions, behaviors and awareness of environmental initiatives is important for both policy makers and social scientists. There is, however, limited consensus among scholars as to the reasons for differences and similarities among ethnic and socio-economic groups in their environmentally related attitudes and behaviors. South Africa, which has established a constitutional right to a safe environment, together with the presence of parallel first and third world populations, offers an unusual setting in which to examine these issues. Using the 2004 South African General Household Survey, the similarities and differences between African and non-African households with respect to the perceptions, behaviors and awareness of programs related to water and water pollution are examined. Africans and those with lower socio-economic status are more likely to perceive water pollution as a community problem; educational attainment is unrelated to this perception. In combination with perception of water pollution as a problem, education is positively related to taking action to treat water for drinking and food preparation. Awareness of a highly touted program to clear waterways of alien vegetation is strongly positively related to socio-economic status, and is much more common among non-Africans than Africans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
African National Congress (ANC) (1992). Ready to govern: Policy guidelines for a democratic South Africa. (28–31 May, 1992) Available at http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/policy/readyto.html Accessed February 2, 2006.
Blake, D. E., Guppy, N., & Urmetzer, P. (1997). Canadian public opinion and environmental action: Evidence from British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30, 451–472.
Bloom, D. E. (1995). International public opinion on the environment. National Bureau of Economic Research Reprint 1998 (pp. 354–358) Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Science, 269(5222), Series.
DEAT (Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism) (2004). Ten year review 1994–2004. Pretoria: DEAT.
DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) (2005). Annual report: 2004–2005. Pretoria: DWAF.
DWAF (2006). Working for water. Pretoria: DWAF.
Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H. Jr., & Gallup, A. (1993). Of global concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey. Environment, 35(6–15), 33–39.
Dunlap, R. E., & Scarce, R. (1991). Poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 651–672.
Heyns C., & Brand D. (2004). Socio-economic rights and the transition. In N. C. Manganyi (Ed.), On becoming a democracy: Transition and transformation in South African society (pp. 25–39). Pretoria: University of South Africa Press.
Hohm, C. (1976). A human ecological approach to the reality and perception of air pollution: The Los Angeles case. Pacific Sociological Review, 19, 21–44.
Holl, K. D., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1995). Knowledge and perceptions in Costa Rica regarding environment, population, and biodiversity issues. Conservation Biology, 9, 1548–1558.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28, 57–72.
Jacobs, J. E. (2002). Community participation, the environment, and democracy: Brazil in comparative perspective. Latin American Politics and Society, 44, 59–88.
Lumby, A. (2005). Government and sustainable development in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic History, 20, 65–82.
Markinor (2006). Perceptions of government responsibility and delivery. Press release, 10 February 2006. Cape Town.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Mbeki, T. (2006). Address of the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki, to the third joint sitting of the third democratic parliament, Cape Town 3 February 2006.
Murch, A. W. (1971). Public concern for environmental pollution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35, 100–106.
Republic of South Africa (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996). Pretoria. Available at http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/index.htm Accessed March 3, 2006.
Rohrschneider, R. T. (1988). Citizens’ attitudes towards environmental issues: Selfish or selfless. Comparative Political Studies, 21, 347–367.
Statistics South Africa. (2004). Stats in brief: Ten years of democratic governance. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
Van Arsdol, Jr., M. D., Sabagh, G., & Alexander, F. (1964). Reality and the perception of environmental hazards. Journal of Health and Human Behavior, Special Issue: The Environmental Health Challenge to Medical Sociology, 5, 144–153.
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181–197.
White, M. J., & Hunter, L. (2005). Public perceptions of environmental issues in a developing setting. Boulder: University of Colorado Research Program on Environment and Behavior Working Paper EB2005-0003. Boulder.
Acknowledgments
Helpful comments were provided by Pieter Kok, Louis van Tonder and Paul Mohai. The research upon which this paper was based was supported by a National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Infrastructure Grant HD41028 to the Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, by the Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa, and by Statistics South Africa. Anderson and Romani were Visiting Researchers in the Urban and Rural Economic Development Research Programme at Human Sciences Research Council, and Anderson was a Visiting Analyst at Statistics South Africa when this paper was prepared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, B.A., Romani, J.H., Phillips, H. et al. Exploring environmental perceptions, behaviors and awareness: water and water pollution in South Africa. Popul Environ 28, 133–161 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0038-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0038-5