Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Quantitative Investigation of the Population-Land Inequality-Land Clearance Nexus

Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a quantitative investigation of the population-land inequality-land clearance nexus. Drawing on the literature on farmer optimization behaviour, the study formalizes and empirically tests a model of population-induced agricultural land clearance. The model makes several assumptions about this process: (a) The rate at which agricultural land is brought into production due to rising population pressures accelerates with the level of inequality in access to land, (b) Egalitarian systems have a greater capacity to absorb rising numbers of people per unit of land area and, thus, will have lower rates of agricultural land clearance than higher ones and (c) Irrespective of its degree of egalitarianism, the capacity of any system to hold people in one place will eventually break down once a critical population threshold is reached. Due to their lower population absorptive capacity, this level will be reached sooner under unequal systems of land distribution. Thus, the model also hypothesizes that the stimulatory impact of population growth on the demand for new land will exhibit a non-linear threshold pattern. For the farmer, the decision to clear a new plot of land will reflect these population-inequality interactions: Earnings from farming in settled areas will tend to fall as population densities and inequality in access to land increase. Time series results confirm that rural population growth is a significant factor driving agricultural land clearance in many of the 59 developing countries of our sample. Results also suggest that this rate of clearance is largest in countries with highly inegalitarian patterns of distribution. In contrast, cross-sectional regression results do not suggest any direct role for land inequality in population-agricultural land use outcomes. Contrary to the model’s assumption that this relationship should follow a non-linear threshold pattern, cross-sectional results also find no evidence that the absorptive capacity of highly densely populated land systems has been reached on average. However, they do provide support for an indirect linear relationship: Population induced agricultural land clearance is significantly magnified as inequality in access to land increases. Drawing on the empirics of the growth-inequality literature, the study suggests that this magnifying role may be linked to inequality’s impact on the assets of the poor. That is, by undermining the capacity of the rural poor to make productive investments in the land base, inequality in land distribution mediates population pressures in a way that affects both the quality and quantity of assets available to the poor to raise incomes, invest in skills accumulation, and spur demand in the rural economy as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • L. Arizpe P. Stone D. Major (1994) Introduction: Rethinking the population debate L. Arizpe P. Stone D. Major (Eds) Population and the environment: Rethinking the debate Social Science Research Council New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Arizpe M. Velazquez (1994) Population and Society L. Arizpe P. Stone D. Major (Eds) Population and the environment: Rethinking the debate Social Science Research Council New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Blanchflower G. Oswald (1998) ArticleTitleWhat makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics 16 IssueID1 26–60

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Bilsborrow (1987) ArticleTitlePopulation pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence World Development 15 183–203

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Bilsborrow (1992) ArticleTitlePopulation growth, internal migration and environmental degradation in rural areas of developing countries European Journal of Population 8 125–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. & DeLargy, P. (1991). Population growth, natural resource use and migration in the third world: The cases of Guatemala and Sudan. In K. Davis, & M. S. Bernstam, (Eds.), Resources, environment, and population, supplement to population and Development Review, 16(suppl) 125–147

  • Birdsall, N. & Londono, J. L. (1997). Asset inequality matters: An assessment of the world bank’s approach to poverty reduction. American Economic Review, 87(2), 32–27. AEA Papers and Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Boserup (1965) The Conditions of Agricultural Growth Aldine Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Boserup (1981) Population and technological change University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cain G. McNicoll (1989) Population growth and agrarian outcomes P. Demeny G. McNicoll (Eds) Population & development Earthscan London 150–164

    Google Scholar 

  • K. M. Cleaver G. A Schreiber (1995) Reversing the spiral: The population, agriculture and environmental nexus in sub-Saharan Africa The World Bank Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C. J. Cruz C. Meyer R. Repetto R. Woodward (1992) Population, Poverty, and environmental stress: Frontier migration in the Philippines and Costa Rica World Resources Institute Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Deininger L. Squire (1998) ArticleTitleNew ways of looking at old issues Journal of Development Economics 57 259–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, P., & Thiesenhusen, W. (1991). Land tenure and deforestation: Interactions and environmental implication. UNRISD Discussion Paper, No. 34. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

  • J. English M. Tiffen M. Mortimore (1994) Land Resource Management in Machakos District, Kenya 1930–1990 The World Bank Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2000). Agrostat Data Base: http://apps.fao.org/page/collections?subset=agriculture

  • L. C. Gray M. Kevane (2001) ArticleTitleEvolving tenure rights and agricultural intensificaiton in southwestern Burkina Faso World Development 29 IssueID4 573–587

    Google Scholar 

  • A. D. Foster M. R. Rosenzweig (2003) ArticleTitleEconomic growth and the rise of forests Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 601–637

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Harvey (1981) Econometric analysis of time series Phillip Allan Hemel Hempsted

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Hayami M. Kikuchi (1982) Asian village economy at the crossroads: An economic approach to institutional change Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIFAD (1992, 2001) The state of world rural poverty International fund for agricultural development. IT Publications Southhamptom, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • N. S. Jodha (1990) Depletion of common property resources in India: Micro-level evidence G. McNicoll M. Cain (Eds) Rural development and population. Supplement to Vol. 15 Population & Development Review Oxford University Press New York 261–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, C., & Boyle T. B. (1993) (Eds.). Population and land use in developing countries: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

  • P. Kennedy (2003) A guide to econometrics. 5th edn Blackwell London

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Koop L. Tole (1999) ArticleTitleIs there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? Journal of Development Economics 58 231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Leach J. Fairhead (2000) ArticleTitleChallenging neo-Malthusian deforestation analyses in West Africa’s dynamic forest landscapes Population & Development Review 26 IssueID1 17–43

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Leonard (1989) Environment and the Poor: Development Strategies for a Common Agenda H. J. Leonard (Eds) Environment and the Poor Overseas Development Council Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • G. McNicoll (1990) Social organization and ecological stability under demographic stress G. McNicoll M. Cain (Eds) Rural development and population. Supplement to Vol. 15 Population & Development Review, pp. 147–167. Oxford University Press New York 147–167

    Google Scholar 

  • G. McNicoll M. Cain (1990) Institutional effects on rural economic and demographic change G. McNicoll M. Cain (Eds) Rural development and population. Supplement to Vol. 15 Population & Development Review, pp. 3–42. Oxford University Press New York 3–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P., & Binswanger, H. P. (1988). Population density and farming systems: The changing locus of innovations and technical change. In R. E. Lee, W. B. Arthur, A. C. Kelley, G. Rodgers & T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Population Food, and Rural Development, pp. 51–76.

  • M. Schmink (1994) The socioeconomic matri nx of deforestation L. Arizpe P. Stone D. Major (Eds) Population and the environment: Methods cases and policies Social Sciences Research Council New York 38–57

    Google Scholar 

  • W. C. Thiesenhusen (1991) ArticleTitleImplications of the rural land tenure system for the environmental debate: Three Scenarios Journal of Developing Areas 26 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tiffen M. Mortimore F. Gichuki (1994) More people, less erosion: Environmental recovery in Kenya Wiley Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Bank (1999) World development indicators. CD Rom World Bank Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Bank (2001) World development report World Bank Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lise Tole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tole, L. A Quantitative Investigation of the Population-Land Inequality-Land Clearance Nexus. Popul Environ 26, 75–106 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-004-0836-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-004-0836-y

Key words

Navigation