Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061.
Atkeson, L. R., & Rapoport, R. B. (2003). The more things change the more they stay the same: Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 495–521.
Bauer, N. (2020). The qualifications gap: Why women must be more qualified than men to win political office. Cambridge University Press.
Besley, T., & Case, A. (2000). Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies. The Economic Journal, 110(467), 672–694.
Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377–393.
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.
Broockman, D. E. (2014). Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office? A regression discontinuity approach. Electoral Studies, 34, 190–204.
Brunner, J. (2018). Kim Schrier tries to make lack of political experience an asset in race with Dino Rossi. The Seattle Times, October 17. https://www.seattletimes.com/settle-news/politics/kim0schrier-tries-to-make-lack-of-political-experience-an-asset-in-race-with-dino-rossi/
Bryant, L. A., Hanmer, M. J., Safarpour, A. C., & McDonald, J. (2020). The power of the state: How postcards from the state increased registration and turnout in Pennsylvania. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09625-2
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2018a). 2018: Women general election candidates for U.S. Congress and Statewide Elected Executive. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/2018-women-candidates-us-congress-and-statewide-elected-executive
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2018b). 2018 summary of women candidates. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/potential-candidate-summary-2018
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2018c). Women Candidates for Congress 1974–2018. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/canwincong_histsum.pdf
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2019). Women in Elective Office 2019. https://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-elective-office-2019
CIRCLE. (2018). Young People Dramatically Increase their Turnout to 31%, Shape 2018 Midterm Elections. November 7. https://civicyouth.org/young-people-dramatically-increase-their-turnout-31-percent-shape-2018-midterm-elections/
Crowder-Meyer, M., & Cooperman, R. (2018). Can’t buy them love: How party culture among donors contributes to the party gap in women’s representation. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1211–1224.
Cramer, R. (2018). In a 2018 democratic primary, it’s good to be a woman. Buzzfeed, May 6. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rubycramer/democratic-primary-women-candidates
Dolan, K. (1998). Voting for women in the ‘year of the woman.’ American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 272–293.
Dolan, K. (2006). Symbolic mobilization? The impact of candidate sex in American elections. American Politics Research, 34(6), 687–704.
Enos, R. (2016). What the demolition of public housing teaches us about the impact of racial threat on political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 123–142.
File, T. (2014). Young-adult voting: An analysis of presidential elections, 1964–2012. Current Population Survey Reports, PS20-572. U.S. Census Bureau.
Fry, R. (2018). Millennials approach baby boomers as America’s largest generation in the electorate. Pew Research Center, April 3. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/03/millennials-approach-baby-boomers-as-largest-generation-in-u-s-electorate/
Fulton, S. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly, 65(2), 303–314.
Fulton, S. A., & Dhima, K. (2020). The gendered politics of congressional elections. Political Behavior, 42(1), 1–27.
Grossman, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.
Guskin, E., & Santamariña, D. (2020). The 2020 polling paradox: Accurate results in some key states but big misses in others. The Washington Post, December 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/09/2020-polling-paradox-accurate-results-some-key-states-big-misses-others/?arc404=true
Hainmeuller, J., & Hiscos, M. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Results from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 61–84.
Hanmer, M. J. (2009). Discount voting: Voter registration reforms and their effects. Cambridge University Press.
Hanmer, M. J., & Kalkan, K. O. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from Limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 263–277.
Hansen, S. B. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender and contextual effects on political proselytizing. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 73–103.
Hemmer, N. (2017). #MeToo’s Roots in the feminist awakening of the 1960s. Vox, November 29. https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/29/16712454/me-too-feminism-sexual-harassment-twitter
Holman, M. R., Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2016). Terrorist threat, male stereotypes, and candidate evaluation. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 134–147.
Klein, E. (2018). The Ford–Kavanaugh sexual assault hearings, explained. Vox, September 28. https://www.vox.com/explainers/2018/9/27/17909782/brett-kavanaugh-christine-ford-supreme-court-senate-sexual-assault-testimony
Lawless, J. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 81–99.
Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. Basic Books.
Medenica, V. E., & Fowler, M. (2020). The intersectional effects of diverse elections on validated turnout in the 2018 midterm elections. Political Research Quarterly, 73(4), 988–1003.
Misra, J. (2019). Voter turnout rates among all voting age and major racial and ethnic groups were higher than in 2014. United States Census Bureau, April 23. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/04/behind-2018-united-states-midterm-election-turnout.html
Newburger, E. (2018). Female candidates are calling out sexism more aggressively on the campaign trail. CNBC, September 27. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/27/female-candidates-are-more-aggressive-about-tackling-gender-based-attacks-in-2018-election.html
Newport, F. (2018). Top issues for voters: healthcare, economy, immigration. Gallup, November 2. https://news.gallup.com/poll/244367/top-issues-voters-healthcare-economy-immigration.aspx
Ondercin, H. L., & Fulton, S. A. (2019). Bargain shopping: How candidate sex lowers the cost of voting. Politics & Gender. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000254
Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2008). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Paolino, P. (1995). Group-salient issues and group representation: Support for women candidates in the 1992 senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 294–313.
Parker, K., Graf, N., & Igielnik, R. (2019). Generation Z looks a lot like Millennials on key social and political issues. Pew Research Center, February 12. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/01/17/generation-z-looks-a-lot-like-millennials-on-key-social-and-political-issues/
Pew Research Center. (2018). The generation gap in American politics. March 1. https://www.people-press.org/2018/03/01/the-generation-gap-in-american-politics/
Reingold, B., & Harrell, J. (2010). The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement: Does party matter? Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 280–294.
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan.
Rouse, S. M., & Ross, A. D. (2018). The politics of Millennials: Political beliefs and policy preferences of America’s most diverse generation. University of Michigan Press.
Safarpour, A. C., Gaynor, S. W., Rouse, S. M., & Swers, M. L. (2021). Replication data for: When Women Run, Voters Will Follow (Sometimes): Examining the Mobilizing Effect of Female Candidates in the 2014 and 2018 Midterm Elections. Harvard, Dataverse, V 1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GCZG82.
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35, 245–266.
Thomsen, D. M. (2015). Why so few (Republican) women? Explaining the partisan imbalance of women in the US congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 295–322.
Thomsen, D. M., & Swers, M. L. (2017). Which women can run? Gender, partisanship, and candidate donor networks. Political Research Quarterly, 70, 449–463.
Wattenberg, M. P. (2015). Is voting for young people? Routledge.
Wolak, J. (2019). Descriptive representation and the political engagement of women. Politics & Gender, 16(2), 1–24.
Wolak, J. (2020). Conflict avoidance and gender gaps in political engagement. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09614-5
Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2017). Role models revisited: Youth, novelty, and the impact of female candidates. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(3), 418–434.
Zhou, L. (2018). 12 charts that explain the record-breaking year women have had in politics. Vox, November 6. https://www.vox.com/2018/11/6/18019234/women-record-breaking-midterms