Aday, S., & Devitt, J. (2001). Style over substance: Newspaper coverage of Elizabeth dole’s presidential bid. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 52–73.
Braden, M. (1996). Women politicians and the media. University Press of Kentucky.
Burnham, K., & Anderson, D. (2003). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
Camia, C. (2014). Report: Wendy davis admits to flubbing bio details. USA Today, .
Damore, D. F. (2002). Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 669–685.
Davis, W. (2013). Wendy Davis' first campaign ad: 'A Texas story.' Real Clear Politics Video.
de Nooy, W., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2013). Polarization in the media during an election campaign: A dynamic network model predicting support and attack among political actors. Political Communication, 30, 117–138.
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2009). Campaign communications in us congressional elections. American Political Science Review, (pp. 343–366).
Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010a). Issue engagement on congressional candidate web sites, 2002–2006. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 3–23.
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010b). Timeless strategy meets new medium: Going negative on congressional campaign web sites, 2002–2006. Political Communication, 27, 88–103.
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2018a). Resisting the opportunity for change: How congressional campaign insiders viewed and used the web in 2016. Social Science Computer Review, 36, 392–405.
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., Parkin, M., & Montes, I. (2018b). An inside view of congressional campaigning on the web. Journal of Political Marketing, 17, 442–475.
Druckman, J., Parkin, M., & Kifer, M. (2013). Congressional candidate websites, ICPSR-34895-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2011). Issue ownership as a determinant of negative campaigning. International Political Science Review, 32, 209–221.
Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS, Political Science & Politics, 47, 454.
Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. 105. Sage.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–74). Elsevier volume 23.
Fridkin, K., & Kenney, P. (2014). The changing face of representation: The gender of US senators and constituent communications. University of Michigan Press.
Gawronski, B., Ehrenberg, K., Banse, R., Zukova, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). It’s in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 16–30.
Geer, J. G. (2008). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
Goffman, E., et al. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life (p. 259). NY: Garden City.
Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods. : CRC Press.
Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.
Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76, 297–307.
Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S., & Mazet, J. (2013). Factominer: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining with r. R package version, 1.
Kahn, K. F. (1994). Does gender make a difference? an experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, (pp. 162–195).
Kahn, K. F., & Fridkin, K. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. Columbia University Press.
Kahn, K. F., & Goldenberg, E. N. (1991). Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in us senate campaign coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 180–199.
Kassambara, A. (2017). Practical guide to principal component methods in R: PCA, M (CA), FAMD, MFA, HCPC, factoextra volume 2. STHDA.
Krupnikov, Y. (2011). When does negativity demobilize? tracing the conditional effect of negative campaigning on voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 797–813.
Lakoff, G. (2010). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. University of Chicago Press.
Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2001). Negative campaigning by us senate candidates. Party Politics, 7, 69–87.
Lau, R. R., & Rovner, I. B. (2009). Negative campaigning. Annual review of political science, 12, 285–306.
Lee, E.-J., & Oh, S. Y. (2012). To personalize or depersonalize? when and how politicians’ personalized tweets affect the public’s reactions. Journal of Communication, 62, 932–949.
Lizardo, O., & Taylor, M. A. (2020). Correspondence analysis. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE Methods Foundations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
McGregor, S. C. (2018). Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention. New media & society, 20, 1139–1160.
McGregor, S. C., Lawrence, R. G., & Cardona, A. (2017). Personalization, gender, and social media: Gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, communication & society, 20, 264–283.
Meeks, L. (2017). Getting personal: Effects of twitter personalization on candidate evaluations. Politics & Gender, 13, 1–25.
Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Personalization of politics on facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23, 1481–1498.
Milita, K., Ryan, J. B., & Simas, E. N. (2014). Nothing to hide, nowhere to run, or nothing to lose: Candidate position-taking in congressional elections. Political Behavior, 36, 427–449.
Miller, M. K., & Peake, J. S. (2013). Press effects, public opinion, and gender: Coverage of sarah palin’s vice-presidential campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 482–507.
Morgan, S., & Winship, C. (2014). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Analytical Methods for Social Research: Cambridge University Press.
Muller, C., Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (2014). Instrumental variables regression. In H. Best & C. Wolf (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Steinmann, F. (2012). How do people judge risks: availability heuristic, affect heuristic, or both? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 18, 314.
Pfau, M., & Rang, J. G. (1991). The impact of relational messages on candidate influence in televised political debates, .
Sandberg, L. A. C., & Öhberg, P. (2017). The role of gender in online campaigning: Swedish candidates’ motives and use of social media during the european election 2014. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14, 314–333.
Schudson, M. (1989). How culture works. Theory and Society, 18, 153–180.
Schweitzer, E. J. (2005). Election campaigning online: German party websites in the 2002 national elections. European Journal of Communication, 20, 327–351.
Schweitzer, E. J. (2011). Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of german online campaigns in the national elections 2002–9. European Journal of Communication, 26, 310–327.
Sigelman, L. (2001). The presentation of self in presidential life: Onstage and backstage with johnson and nixon. Political Communication, 18, 1–22.
Singer, J. D., Willett, J. B., Willett, J. B. et al. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford university press.
Slater, W. (2014). As wendy davis touts life story in race for governor, key facts blurred. The Dallas Morning News, .
Stanyer, J. (2008). Elected representatives, online self-presentation and the personal vote: Party, personality and webstyles in the united states and united kingdom. Information, Community & Society, 11, 414–432.
Stanyer, J. (2013). Intimate politics: Publicity, privacy and the personal lives of politicians in media saturated democracies. Wiley.
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2007). Instrumental variables regression. Introduction to econometrics (2nd ed., pp. 421–467). Boston, MA: Pearson-Addison Wesley, .
Team, R. C. et al. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Trammell, K. D. (2006). Blog offensive: An exploratory analysis of attacks published on campaign blog posts from a political public relations perspective. Public Relations Review, 32, 402–406.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield.
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. springer.
Wood, M. L., Stoltz, D. S., Van Ness, J., & Taylor, M. A. (2018). Schemas and frames. Sociological Theory, 36, 244–261.