When seeking political information, people are motivated to selectively seek information that is congruent with their prior attitudes. However, some individuals may do so more than others, and not much is known about what factors affect such individual differences. Rigid religious faith is one variable that may promote selective exposure. Messages of the importance of rigid faith—the idea that religious beliefs must be held firmly and not doubted—could encourage a habit of selective exposure to information that supports existing religious beliefs. As a side effect, this habit of selective exposure might be applied outside the context of religion. In this study, an information-search task on a non-religious political issue is used to demonstrate that subjects prefer to read a greater number of arguments that are congruent with their prior attitudes on the issue, and this effect of prior attitudes on information-search behavior is found to be stronger among individuals who have rigid religious convictions. A scrambled-sentence task is used to prime half the subjects with religious concepts prior to completing the information-search task. This experiment demonstrates that increased salience of religious faith causes an increase in selective exposure to attitude-congruent political information.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Examination of scatterplots (which can be found in the online appendix) does not suggest any strong non-linear trends in the data, so the analyses in this paper are conducted using linear models.
Adding only NFC to the model without adding CRT (alternate model not shown in table) reduces the estimated interactive effect of rigid religious conviction to 0.045. Adding only CRT without NFC reduces the effect to 0.037.
Estimating this same model while excluding participants who have very low scores for rigid religious conviction (such as those who have a score of zero or those who have a score lower than some other arbitrary low threshold) produces similar results and only makes the effects appear slightly stronger than those reported here.
Ahmed, A. M., & Salas, O. (2011). Implicit influences of christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(3), 242–246.
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). Research: A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47–54.
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230.
Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific study of Religion, 15, 29–45.
Batson, C. D., & Raynor-Prince, L. (1983). Religious orientation and complexity of thought about existential concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 38–50.
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond ses: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
Chen, P. G., Appleby, J., Borgida, E., Callaghan, T. H., Ekstrom, P., Farhart, C. E., et al. (2014). The minnesota multi-investigator 2012 presidential election panel study. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 78–104.
Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from mechanical turk valid for research on political ideology? Research Politics, 2(4), 2053168015622072.
Duriez, B., Fontaine, J. R., & Hutsebaut, D. (2000). A further elaboration of the post-critical belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in flanders-belgium. Psychologica Belgica, 40(3), 153–182.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285.
Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493–496.
Graham, B. (2015). God has given you everything you need to strengthen your faith. Retrieved 23 August, 2020 from https://billygraham.org/answer/god-has-given-you-everything-you-need-to-strengthen-your-faith/.
Hardin, R. (1997). The economics of religious belief. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 153, 259–278.
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555.
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39.
James, W. (1896). The will to believe: And other essays in popular philosophy. Harlow: Longmans, Green, and Company.
Jang, S. M. (2014). Seeking congruency or incongruency online? Examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Science Communication, 36(2), 143–167.
Johnson, T. J., Bichard, S. L., & Zhang, W. (2009). Communication communities or “cyberghettos?”: A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 60–82.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Boyatzi, L. M. (2012). The psychology of closed and open mindedness, rationality, and democracy. Critical Review, 24(2), 217–232.
Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861–861.
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20.
Lewis, A. R., Djupe, P. A., Mockabee, S. T., & Su-Ya Wu, J. (2015). The (non) religion of mechanical turk workers. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(2), 419–428.
McFarland, S. G., & Warren, J. C, Jr. (1992). Religious orientations and selective exposure among fundamentalist christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 163–174.
Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138.
New Era, T. (1973). What would you do?. Retrieved August 23, 2020 from https://www.lds.org/new-era/1973/05/what-would-you-do.
New Era, T. (2007). Questions and answers. Retrieved August 23, 2020 from https://www.lds.org/new-era/2007/07/q-and-a-questions-and-answers.
Osteen, V. (2016). Increasing faith. Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://www.joelosteen.com/en-US/inspiration/blogs/2017/11/27/23/12/Increasing%20Faith.
Parker, K., Horowitz, J., Igielnik, R., Oliphant, B., & Brown, A. (2017). America’s complex relationship with guns: an in-depth look at the attitudes and experiences of US adults. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127.
Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303–315.
Saroglou, V. (2002). Beyond dogmatism: The need for closure as related to religion. Mental Health Religion Culture, 5(2), 183–194.
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 141(3), 423.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1660.
Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory Cognition, 39(7), 1275.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049.
Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S. B., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 432–453.
John Barry Ryan, Milton Lodge, Stanley Feldman, Paul Djupe, Randy Cragun, Hyun A Kim, Stephen Ceccoli, Joanne Miller, Ryan Cragun, Ryan Claasen.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: Table 3 footnote was added.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Cragun, J. Rigid Religious Faith Promotes Selective Exposure to Attitude-Congruent Political Information. Polit Behav (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09650-1
- Motivated reasoning
- Selective exposure
- Confirmation bias
- Individual differences
- Information seeking