Development Context and the Political Behavior of Remittance Recipients in Latin America and the Caribbean

  • Abby CórdovaEmail author
  • Jonathan Hiskey
Original Paper


Remittances have become a chief source of family income in developing countries. As such, these revenue streams have the potential to impact recipients’ political behavior. Empirical studies investigating this proposition, however, have yielded seemingly contradictory findings. We develop a theoretical framework that highlights the importance of national development context in understanding the distinct cross-national political behavior patterns between remittance recipients and non-recipients. Leveraging the variations in development levels across 24 Latin American countries, we evaluate propositions derived from this contention that the political implications of remittances depend in part on the development context into which they flow. We find evidence for a posited inverse relationship between development levels and the extent to which receipt of remittances induces political participation. We argue these divergent patterns emerge from the asymmetrical effect remittances have on the economic perceptions and cross-border ties of recipients living in distinct development contexts.


Political participation Remittances Migration Development 



The authors are thankful to the editors of Political Behavior and anonymous reviewers for their excellent feedback. Abby Córdova also thanks the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame for supporting her research with a visiting fellowship, which allowed her to work on this project. The data and code to replicate the results reported in this paper can be found in the Political Behavior data archive in Dataverse.

Supplementary material

11109_2019_9574_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (516 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 516 kb)


  1. Ahmed, F. Z. (2017). Remittances and incumbency: Theory and evidence. Economics and Politics, 29(1), 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, R. (2012). Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 570–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady, H., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bravo, J. (2009). Emigración y compromiso político en México. Gobierno y Política, volumen temático: Elecciones en México, pp. 273–310.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, K. (2012). Collective remittances and migrant-state collaboration in Mexico and El Salvador. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(4), 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (2011). Migration, remittances, and household strategies. Annual Review of Antropology, 40, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Córdova, A., & Hiskey, J. (2015). Shaping politics at home: Cross-border social ties and local-level political engagement. Comparative Political Studies, 48(11), 1454–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crow, D., & Pérez-Armendáriz, C. (2017). Talk without borders: why political discussion makes Latin Americans with relatives abroad more critical of their democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 51(2), 238–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duquette-Rury, L. (2014). Collective remittances and transnational coproduction: The 3X1 program for migrants and household access to public goods in Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development, 49(1), 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duquette-Rury, L. (2016). Migrant transnational participation: How citizen inclusion and government engagement matter for local democratic engagment in Mexico. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 771–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duquette-Rury, L., Waldinger, R., & Lim, N. (2018). Foreign connections and the difference they make: How migrant ties influence political interest and attitudes in Mexico. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(35), 1–22.Google Scholar
  14. Espinal, R., & Zhao, S. (2015). Gender gaps in civic and political participation in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(1), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gastil, J., Pierre Deess, E., Weiser, O., & Meade, J. (2008). Jury service and electoral participation: A test of the participation hypothesis. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Germano, R. (2013). Migrants’ remittances and economic voting in the Mexican countryside. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 875–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, G. L., & Hiskey, J. (2008). Exit without leaving: Political disengagement in high migration municipalities in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 40(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Habibov, N., & Afandi, E. (2009). Analysis of subjective well-being in low-income transitional countries: Evidence from comparative national surveys in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 25(3), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapur, D. (2010). Diaspora, development, and democracy: The domestic impact of international migration from India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lau, R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lleras, C. (2005). Path analysis. The encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 25–30). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meseguer, C., & Aparicio, F. J. (2012). Migration and distributive politics: The political economy of Mexico’s 3x1 program. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(4), 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morales, D., & Maia, A. G. (2018). The impacts of cash transfers on subjective well-being and poverty: The case of Colombia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39, 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Mahony, A. (2013). Political investment, remittances, and elections. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez-Armendáriz, C., & Crow, D. (2010). Do migrants remit democracy? International migration, political beliefs, and behavior in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(1), 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petterson, S., & Friel, L. (2001). Psychological distress, hopelessness, and welfare. Women and Health, 32, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pfutze, T. (2012). Does migration promote democratization? Evidence from the Mexican transition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sharma, K. (2009). The impact of remittances on economic insecurity. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN/DESA) Working Paper No. 78.Google Scholar
  31. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Los Angeles: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tertytchnaya, K., De Vries, C., Solaz, H., & Doyle, D. (2018). When the money stops: Fluctuations in financial remittances and incumbent approval in Central Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 758–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. UNDP. (2010). The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. UNDP. (2015). Human development report: Work for human development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). “Remittances.” In Toward human resilience: Sustaining MDG progress in an age of economic uncertainty. Retrieved from
  36. Verba, S., Nie, N. H., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven nation comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. World Bank. (2016). Migration and remittances: Factbook 2016 (3rd ed.). Washington: World Bank Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Kellogg Institute for International StudiesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations