Advertisement

Which Party Represents My Group? The Group Foundations of Partisan Choice and Polarization

  • Ryan L. ClaassenEmail author
  • Paul A. Djupe
  • Andrew R. Lewis
  • Jacob R. Neiheisel
Original Paper

Abstract

While groups have been central to thinking about partisan identity and choices, there has been surprisingly little attention paid to the role of perceptions of the group composition of the parties. We explore this critical linking information in the context of religious groups, some of the chief pivots around which the parties have been sorting. Using three national samples, we show that perceptions of the religious group composition of the parties are often biased—evangelicals overestimate the presence of evangelicals within the Republican Party and the irreligious within the Democratic Party. The key finding is that individuals are far more likely to identify with the party in which they believe their group is well represented—a finding which clarifies the role of party image shifts in constructing partisanship, the limits of the culture war motif, and the importance of social perception in shaping beliefs about party representation.

Keywords

Culture war Evangelicals Secular God gap Polarization Representation Group identity Party identification Party composition 

Notes

Supplementary material

11109_2019_9565_MOESM1_ESM.docx (302 kb)
Online Appendix (DOCX 301 kb)

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2006). Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity vs. ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 175–187.Google Scholar
  2. Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. Journal of Politics, 80(3), 964–981.Google Scholar
  4. Axelrod, R. (1972). Where the votes come from: An analysis of electoral coalitions, 1952–1968. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  5. Baylor, C. (2017). First to the party: The group origins of party transformation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bentley, A. F. (1908). The process of government: A study of social pressures. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  7. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berinsky, A. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Black, A. (2016). Evangelicals, politics, and public policy: Lessons from the past, prospects for the future. In C. G. Brown & M. Silkm (Eds.), The future of evangelicalism in America (pp. 124–157). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, M. D. (2009). Party images in the American electorate. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (1997). Social cleavages and political alignments: U.S. presidential elections, 1960 to 1992. American Sociological Review, 62(6), 937–946.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, R. D. (1995). Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 23–33.Google Scholar
  13. Burge, R. P., & Lewis, A. R. (2018). Measuring evangelicals: Practical considerations for social scientists. Politics & Religion, 11(4), 745–759.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, D. E., Green, J. C., & Layman, G. C. (2011). The party faithful: Partisan images, candidate religion, and the electoral impact of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 42–58.Google Scholar
  16. Carmines, E. (1991). The logic of party alignments. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(1), 65–80.Google Scholar
  17. Carmines, E. G., & Stanley, H. W. (1992). The transformation of the new deal party system: social groups, political ideology, and changing partisanship among northern whites. Political Behavior, 14(3), 213–237.Google Scholar
  18. Claassen, R. (2015). Godless democrats and pious republicans? Party activists, party capture, and the “God Gap”. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature and belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Converse, P. E. (1966). Religion and politics: The 1960 election. In A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, & D. Stokes (Eds.), Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Djupe, P. A. (2011). Political pluralism and the information search: Determinants of group opinionation. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 68–81.Google Scholar
  22. Djupe, P. A., & Lewis, A. R. (2015). Solidarity and discord of pluralism: How the social context affects interest group learning and belonging. American Politics Research, 43(3), 394–424.Google Scholar
  23. Djupe, P. A., & Neiheisel, J. R. (2008). Christian right horticulture: Grassroots support in a republican primary campaign. Politics & Religion, 1(1), 55–84.Google Scholar
  24. Djupe, P. A., Neiheisel, J. R., & Sokhey, A. E. (2018). Reconsidering the role of politics in leaving religion: The importance of affiliation. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 161–175.Google Scholar
  25. Doherty, C., Kiley, J., & O’Hea, O. (2018). Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  26. Edgell, P., Gertais, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as ‘Other’: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American Society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211–234.Google Scholar
  27. Elder, C. D., & Cobb, R. W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Erikson, R. S., Lancaster, T. D., & Romero, D. W. (1989). Group components of the presidential vote, 1952–1984. Journal of Politics, 51(2), 337–346.Google Scholar
  29. Green, J. C. (2007). The faith factor: How religion influences American elections. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Green, J. C. (2010a). Gauging the god gap: Religion and voting in U.S. presidential elections. In J. E. Leighley (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American elections and political behavior (pp. 433–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Green, J. C. (2010b). Religious diversity and American democracy: A view from the polls. In A. Wolfe & I. Katznelson (Eds.), Religion and democracy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological republicans and interest group democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hansen, S. B. (2011). Religion and reaction: The secular political challenge to the religious right. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Hoge, D. R. (1988). Why Catholics drop out. In D. G. Bromley (Ed.), Falling from the faith: Causes and consequences of religious apostasy. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2002). No religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 165–190.Google Scholar
  37. Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, R. P. (2016). The end of White Christian America. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  39. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.Google Scholar
  40. Kalmoe, N. P. (2019). Speaking of parties…dueling views of a canonical measure of sophistication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 68–90.Google Scholar
  41. Karol, D. (2009). Party position change in American politics: Coalition management. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kinder, D. R., Adams, G. S., & Gronke, P. W. (1989). Economics and politics in the 1984 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 491–515.Google Scholar
  43. Layman, G. C. (1997). Religion and political behavior in the United States: The impact of beliefs, affiliation, and commitment from 1980 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(2), 288–316.Google Scholar
  44. Layman, G. C. (2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Layman, G. C. (2010). Religion and party activists: A ‘Perfect Storm’ of polarization or a recipe for pragmatism? In A. Wolfe & I. Katznelson (Eds.), Religion and democracy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Layman, G. C., & Brockway, M. (2018). Evangelical activists in the GOP: Still the life of the party? In P. A. Djupe & R. L. Claassen (Eds.), The evangelical crackup? The future of the evangelical-republican coalition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Layman, G. C., & Green, J. C. (2006). Wars and rumours of wars: The contexts of cultural conflict in American political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 61–89.Google Scholar
  48. Leege, D., Wald, K. D., Krueger, B. S., & Mueller, P. D. (2002). The politics of cultural differences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lewis, A. R. (2017). The rights turn in conservative christian politics: How abortion transformed the culture wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lewis, A. R., & De Bernardo, D. H. (2010). Belonging without belonging: Utilizing evangelical self-identification to analyze political attitudes and preferences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1), 112–126.Google Scholar
  51. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  53. Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology, 39(51), 257–277.Google Scholar
  56. Matthews, D. R., & Prothro, J. W. (1964). Southern images of political parties: An analysis of White and Negro attitudes. Journal of Politics, 26(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, A. H., & Wlezien, C. (1993). The social group dynamics of partisan evaluations. Electoral Studies, 12(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  58. Miller, A. H., Wlezien, C., & Hildreth, A. (1991). A reference group theory of partisan coalitions. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1134–1149.Google Scholar
  59. Olson, L. R., & Green, J. C. (2006). The religion gap. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(3), 455–459.Google Scholar
  60. Olson, L. R., & Warber, A. L. (2008). Belonging, behaving, and believing: Assessing the role of religion on presidential approval. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 192–204.Google Scholar
  61. Patrikios, S. (2008). American republican religion? Disentangling the causal link between religion and politics in the US. Political Behavior, 30, 367–389.Google Scholar
  62. Philpot, T. S. (2007). Race, republicans, and the return of the party of Lincoln. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  63. Putnam, R., & Campbell, D. (2010). American Grace. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  64. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. (2002). Social Identity Complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106.Google Scholar
  65. Rothschild, J. E., Howat, A. J., Shafranek, R. M., & Busby, E. C. (2018). Pigeonholing partisans: Stereotypes of party supporters and partisan polarization. Political Behavior, 41(2), 423–443.Google Scholar
  66. Shelton, J. E. (2018). Is RELTRAD still the gold standard? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 57(4), 817–826.Google Scholar
  67. Smidt, C. E., Den Dulk, K. R., Froehle, B. T., Penning, J. M., Monsma, S. V., & Koopman, D. L. (2010). The disappearing god gap? Religion in the 2008 presidential election. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, G. A., Sciupac, E. P., Gecewicz, C., & Hackett, C. (2018). Comparing the RELTRAD and born-again/evangelical self-identification approaches to measuring American protestantism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 57(4), 830–847.Google Scholar
  69. Stanley, H. W., Bianco, W. T., & Niemi, R. G. (1986). Partisanship and group support over time: A multivariate analysis. American Political Science Review, 80(3), 969–976.Google Scholar
  70. Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79(1), 291–318.Google Scholar
  71. Trilling, R. J. (1976). Party image and electoral behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  72. Truman, D. B. (1951). The governmental process: Public interests and public opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  73. Valentino, N. & Khirkov, K. (2017). Blue is black and red is white? Affective polarization and the racialized schemas of U.S. Party Coalitions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the midwest political science association.Google Scholar
  74. Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wlezien, C., & Miller, A. H. (1997). Social groups and political judgments. Social Science Quarterly, 78(3), 625–640.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceKent State UniversityKentUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceDenison UniversityGranvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  4. 4.Department of Political ScienceUniversity at Buffalo, SUNYBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations