Advertisement

A Matter of Principle? On the Relationship Between Racial Resentment and Ideology

  • Adam M. EndersEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Though most scholars of race and politics agree that old-fashioned racism largely gave way to a new symbolic form of racism over the course of the last half century, there is still disagreement about how to best empirically capture this new form of racism. Racial resentment, perhaps the most popular operationalization of symbolic racism, has been criticized for its overlap with liberal-conservative ideology. Critics argue that racially prejudiced responses to the items that compose the racial resentment scale are observationally equivalent to the responses that conservatives would provide. In this manuscript, I examine the racial resentment scale for differential item functioning (DIF) by level of adherence to ideological principles using the 1992, 2004, and 2016 American National Election Studies. I find that responses to some of the racial resentment items are, indeed, affected by ideology. However, the problem is largely confined to 2016 and more egregious with respect to ideological self-identifications than adherence to ideological principles. Moreover, even after correcting for DIF, the racial resentment scale serves as a strong predictor of attitudes about racial issues.

Keywords

Race Racial resentment Symbolic racism Ideology Conflicted conservatism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Miles Armaly, Jamil Scott, Paul Sniderman, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, critiques, and suggestions. All errors are my own.

Supplementary material

11109_2019_9561_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (208 kb)
Electronic supplementary material 1 (PDF 208 kb)

References

  1. Ackerman, T. A. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carmines, E. G., Sniderman, P. M., & Easter, B. C. (2011). On the meaning, measurement, and implications of racial resentment. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 634(1), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, P. G., & Goren, P. N. (2016). Operational ideology and party identification: A dynamic model of individual-level change in partisan and ideological predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(4), 703–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 38(8), 1–30.Google Scholar
  6. Chun, S., Stark, S., Kim, E. S., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2016). MIMIC methods for detecting DIF among multiple groups: Exploring a new sequential-free baseline procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(7), 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Claassen, C., Tucker, P., & Smith, S. S. (2015). Ideological labels in America. Political Behavior, 37(2), 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006). Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. Medical Care, 44(11), S115–S123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeSante, C. D. (2013). Working twice as hard to get half as far: Race, work ethic, and America’s deserving poor. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enders, A. M., & Scott, J. S. (2019). The increasing racialization of American electoral politics, 1988–2016. American Politics Research, 47(2), 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Free, L. A., & Cantril, H. (1967). The political beliefs of Americans. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hare, C., Armstrong, D. A., Bakker, R., Carroll, R., & Poole, K. T. (2015). Using Bayesian Aldrich–McKelvey scaling to study citizens’ ideological preferences and perceptions. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henry, P. J., & Sears, D. O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huddy, L., & Feldman, S. (2009). The structure of racial attitudes among whites. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacoby, W. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kam, C. D., & Burge, C. D. (2018). Uncovering reactions to the racial resentment scale across the racial divide. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kinder, D. R., & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kinder, D. R., & Mendelberg, T. (2000). Individualism reconsidered: Principles and prejudice in contemporary American opinion. In D. R. Kinder & T. Mendelberg (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Knuckey, J., & Kim, M. (2015). Racial resentment, old-fashioned racism, and the vote choice of southern and nonsouthern whites in the 2012 US presidential election. Social Science Quarterly, 96(4), 905–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levendusky, M. S. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative-liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mason, L. (2015). I disrespectfully agree’: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neblo, M. A. (2009a). Meaning and measurement: Reorienting the race politics debate. Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 474–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neblo, M. A. (2009b). Three-fifths a racist: A typology for analyzing public opinion about race. Political Behavior, 31(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pérez, E. O., & Hetherington, M. J. (2014). Authoritarianism in black and white: Testing the cross-racial validity of the child rearing scale. Political Analysis, 22, 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pietryka, M. T., & MacIntosh, R. C. (2013). An analysis of ANES items and their use in the construction of political knowledge scales. Political Analysis, 21, 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rabinowitz, J. L., Sears, D. O., Sidanius, J., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). Why do White Americans oppose race-targeted policies? Clarifying the impact of symbolic racism. Political Psychology, 30(5), 805–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schuman, H. (2000). The perils of correlation, the lure of labels, and the beauty of negative results. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sears, D. O., Van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism?: The origins of White Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 16–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150.Google Scholar
  43. Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2016). The electoral landscape of 2016. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sniderman, P. M., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sniderman, P. M., Crosby, G. C., & Howell, W. G. (2000). The politics of race. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in American. Princeton, NJ: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sniderman, P. M., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Swaminathan, H., & Jane Rogers, H. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(4), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52(3), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tarman, C., & Sears, D. O. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. Journal of Politics, 67(3), 731–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tesler, M. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How president Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 690–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tesler, Michael. (2013). The return of old fashioned racism to White Americans’ partisan preferences in the early Obama era. Journal of Politics, 75(1), 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valentino, N. A., & Sears, D. O. (2005). Old times are not forgotten: Race and partisan realignment in the contemporary south. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 672–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wallsten, K., Nteta, T. M., McCarthy, L. A., & Tarsi, M. R. (2017). Prejudice or principled conservatism? Racial resentment and white opinion toward paying college athletes. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang, W.-C., & Shih, C.-L. (2010). MIMIC methods for assessing differential item functioning in polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, D. C., & Davis, D. W. (2011). Reexamining racial resentment: Conceptualization and content. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 634(1), 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zigerell, L. J. (2015). Distinguishing racism from ideology: A methodological inquiry. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations