Political Considerations in Nonpolitical Decisions: A Conjoint Analysis of Roommate Choice
Research shows the increasing tendency of partisan considerations to influence decisions outside the context of politics, including residential choice. Scholars attribute this tendency to affective distaste for members of the other party. However, little work has investigated the relative influence of political and nonpolitical factors in these situations—and it has not sufficiently ruled out alternative explanations for these phenomena. Do people mainly choose to socially avoid members of the other party for political reasons, or is partisanship simply perceived to be correlated with relevant nonpolitical considerations? In some settings, political affiliation may serve primarily as a cue for other factors. As a result, studies that manipulate partisanship but fail to include other individuating information may exaggerate partisanship’s importance in these decisions. To address this shortcoming, I assess the impact of political and nonpolitical considerations on roommate selection via conjoint analysis. I find that partisanship strongly influences this social decision even in the presence of nonpolitical-but-politically-correlated individuating information. Partisan preferences are also moderated by roommates’ perceived levels of political interest. Finally, other social traits do matter, but how they matter depends on partisanship. Specifically, partisans report increased willingness to live with counter-stereotypic out-partisans. This suggests that partisan social divides may be more easily bridged by individuals with cross-cutting identities.
KeywordsPartisanship Affective polarization Homophily Conjoint
I thank John Bullock, Jamie Druckman, Laurel Harbridge-Yong, Chris Karpowitz, Teppei Yamamoto, members of the Druckman political science research lab, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and advice. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University. Data and replication code for the analyses presented in this paper can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GUATS6.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abrams, S. J., & Fiorina, M. P. (2012). ‘The Big Sort’ that wasn’t: A skeptical reexamination. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(2), 203–210.Google Scholar
- Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2017). Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments. Presented at the annual summer meeting of the society for political methodology, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Caughey, D. (2016). Confounding in survey experiments: Diagnostics and solutions. Working paper. Retrieved from http://www.allandafoe.com/confounding.
- Deichert, M. A. (2016). Partisan identity and the cultural stereotypes of political parties. Presented at the annual meeting of the midwest political science association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants. In Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41–57).Google Scholar
- Druckman, J. N., Gubitz, S. R., Levendusky, M. S., & Lloyd, A. M. (Forthcoming). How incivility on partisan media (de-)polarizes the electorate. Journal of Politics. Google Scholar
- Ferro, S. (2014). The percentage of adult americans living with roommates has been surging. Business Insider. Retrieved November 3, 2014, from http://www.businessinsider.com/americans-with-roommates-are-skyrocketing-2014-11.
- Howat, A. J. N.d. Political engagement and perceived value conflict. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Kelly, J. T. (2018). Fitting the stereotype: Partisan/ideological group stereotypes and social identity. Presented at the annual meeting of the southern political science association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Klar, S., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent politics: How American disdain for parties leads to political inaction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. https://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/
- Rogers, K. Roommates wanted. Trump supporters need not apply. The New York Times. 10 February 2017.Google Scholar
- Shafranek, R. M. Forthcoming. Political consequences of partisan prejudice. Political Psychology.Google Scholar