Advertisement

The Resistance as Role Model: Disillusionment and Protest Among American Adolescents After 2016

  • David E. Campbell
  • Christina WolbrechtEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

We examine whether the unprecedented 2016 presidential election led to political disillusionment among young people, whether that disillusionment led to a withdrawal from politics or an intention to be more politically active, and if those effects vary by gender and partisan identity. Using a nationally-representative panel study of adolescents and their parents, we find that Democratic girls became more pessimistic about the responsiveness of the American political system in the wake of 2016. Democratic girls in general became substantially more interested in engaging in political protest after 2016, especially Democratic girls who became disillusioned with American politics. In addition, having a parent who became more likely to engage in protest after 2016 also encouraged more interest in protest among adolescents. We view these outcomes as evidence of the gendered character of the 2016 election (including the first woman nominee and the sexist language and behavior of her opponent) and the impact of activists in girls’ communities and families who served as role models for responding to the current political moment.

Keywords

Political participation Political protest Sex Gender 2016 election 

Notes

Supplementary material

11109_2019_9537_MOESM1_ESM.docx (78 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 77 kb)

References

  1. Alozie, N. O., Simon, J., & Merrill, B. D. (2003). Gender and political orientation in childhood. The Social Science Journal, 40, 1–18.Google Scholar
  2. Alter, C. (2018). A year ago, they marched. Now a record number of women are running for office, Time, January 29.Google Scholar
  3. Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., & Newcomb, T. M. (1991). Political attitudes over the life span: The Bennington women after fifty years. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Loser’s consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061.Google Scholar
  6. Atkeson, L. R., & Rapoport, R. B. (2003). The more things change the more they stay the same: Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 495–521.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identifactory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Baxter, S., & Lansing, M. (1980). Women & politics: The visible majority. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, P., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94–108.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K. (1991) Family traditions, political periods, and the development of partisan orientations. The Journal of Politics, 53(3), 742–763.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett, L. L. M., & Bennett, S. E. (1989). Enduring gender differences in political interest: The impact of socialization & political dispositions. American Politics Quarterly, 17, 105–122.Google Scholar
  12. Biggs, J. E. (2008). Young women and politics: An oxymoron? Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 579–592.Google Scholar
  13. Blais, A. & Achen, C.H. (2018). Civic duty and voter turnout. Political Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9459-3.
  14. Bonneau, C.W., & K. Kanthak (2018). Stronger together: political ambition and the presentation of women running for office. Politics, Groups, and Identities,  https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1528159.
  15. Brinkman, B. G. (2017). Promoting adolescent girls’ civic engagement and activism. In A. L. Bos & M. C. Schneider (Eds.), The political psychology of women in US politics (pp. 34–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Broockman, D. E. (2014). Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office ? A regression discontinuity approach. Electoral Studies, 34, 190–204.Google Scholar
  17. Burleigh, N. (2016). The Presidential Election Was A Referendum on Gender & Women Lost. Newsweek, November 14. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from https://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/18/hillary-clinton-presidential-election-voter-gender-gap-520579.html.
  18. Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1995). The private roots of public action: gender, equality, & political participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, E. Q. (1969). Adolescent socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, A. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Campbell, D. E. (2008). Why we vote: How schools & communities shape our civic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The american voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Campbell, D. E., & Wolbrecht, C. (2006). See Jane Run: Women Politicians as role models for adolescents. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233–247.Google Scholar
  24. Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2018). 2018 summary of women candidates. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/potential-candidate-summary-2018.
  25. Chenoweth, E. & Pressman, J. (2017). This is what we learned by counting the women’s marches, The Monkey Cage blog, February 7. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/02/07/this-is-what-we-learned-by-counting-the-womens-marches/.
  26. Cillizza, C. (2016). Why Donald Trump’s attack on Hillary Clinton’s ‘stamina’ fell flat, in 1 picture. The Washington Post, September 27. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/27/why-donald-trumps-attack-on-hillary-clintons-stamina-fell-flat-in-1-picture/?utm_term=.b4fd87d8ab32.
  27. Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 49–70.Google Scholar
  28. Clinton, H. (@HillaryClinton). (2016). To every little girl who dreams big: Yes, you can be anything you want—even president. Tonight is for you. –H. June 7, 8:08 p.m. Tweet.Google Scholar
  29. Collingwood, L., Lajevardi, N., & Oskooii, K. A. R. (2018). A change of heart? Why individual-level public opinion shifted against Trump’s “Muslim Ban”. Political Behavior, 40, 1035–1072.Google Scholar
  30. Conway, M. M. (1985). Political participation in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  31. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–474.Google Scholar
  32. Diaz, D. (2016). Trump: I ‘wasn’t impressed’ when Clinton walked in front of me at debate. CNN.com, October 15. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-appearance-debate/index.html.
  33. Dolan, K. (2006). Symbolic mobilization? The impact of candidate sex in American elections. American Politics Research, 34(6), 687–704.Google Scholar
  34. Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(February), 57–79.Google Scholar
  35. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(October), 435–457.Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, J. (1975). The politics of women’s liberation. New York: McKay Company Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Ganley, C. M., George, C. E., Cimpian, J. R., & Makowski, M. B. (2018). Gender equity in college majors: looking beyond the STEM/non-STEM dichotomy for answers regarding female participation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(June), 453–487.Google Scholar
  38. General Social Survey (GSS). (2018). Data explorer. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org/trends/.
  39. Gilardi, F. (2015). The temporary importance of role models for women’s political representation. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 957–970.Google Scholar
  40. Gniewosz, B., Noack, P., & Buhl, M. (2009). Political alienation in adolescence: Associations with parental role models, parenting styles, and classroom climate. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(4), 337–346.Google Scholar
  41. Greenstein, F. I. (1969). Children & politics (Revised ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Han, H. (2009). Moved to action: Motivation, participation & inequality in American politics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hanmer, M. J., & Kalkan, K. O. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities & marginal effect from limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 263–277.Google Scholar
  44. Hansen, S. B. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender & contextual effects on political proselytizing. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 73–103.Google Scholar
  45. Huddy, L. & Willmann, J. (2017). Partisan sorting & the feminist gap in American politics. Working paper.Google Scholar
  46. Jennings, M. K. (1987). Residues of a movement: The aging of the american protest generation. The American Political Science Review, 81(2), 367–382.Google Scholar
  47. Jennings, M. K. (2002). Generational units & the student protest movement in the United States: An intra- & intergenerational analysis. Political Psychology, 23(2), 303–324.Google Scholar
  48. Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family Transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.Google Scholar
  49. Johnston, Lloyd D, Jerald G. Bachman, Patrick M. O’Malley, John E. Schulenberg, & Richard A. Miech. (2016). “Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th-Grade Survey).” ICPSR 36798. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/.
  50. Kanthak, K., & Woon, J. (2015). Women don’t run? Election aversion & candidate entry. American Journal of Political Science, 59(July), 595–612.Google Scholar
  51. Knol, M. J., Pestman, W. R., & Grobbee, D. E. (2011). The (mis)use of overlap of confidence intervals to assess effect modification. European Journal of Epidemiology, 26(4), 253–254.Google Scholar
  52. Koch, J. (1997). Candidate gender & women’s psychological engagement in politics. American Politics Quarterly, 25(1), 118–133.Google Scholar
  53. Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., & Harder, J. (2010). The psychological underpinnings of political behavior. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Lawless, J. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen & symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 81–99.Google Scholar
  55. Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lips, H. M. (1995). Gender-Role Socialization: Lessons in Femininity. In Jo Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  57. Lizotte, M. (2017). The gender gap in public opinion: exploring social role theory as an explanation. In A. L. Bos & M. C. Schneider (Eds.), The political psychology of women in U.S. politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Maher, J. & Eder, S. (2016). The Electoral College is hated by many. So why does it endure? New York Times, November 10. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/us/politics/the-electoral-college-is-hated-by-many-so-why-does-it-endure.html.
  59. Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
  60. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks & women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.Google Scholar
  61. Mariani, M., Marshall, B. W., & Mathews-Schultz, A. L. (2015). See Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, & Sarah Palin Run? Party, ideology, & the influence of female role models on young women. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 716–731.Google Scholar
  62. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25(August), 507–523.Google Scholar
  63. Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger & how to save it. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mounk, Y. & Foa, R. S. (2016). Yes, people really are turning away from democracy, The Monkey Cage blog, The Washington Post, December 8. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/12/08/yes-millennials-really-are-surprisingly-approving-of-dictators/?utm_term=.658bcc151ee4.
  65. Muller, E. N., Dietz, H. A., & Finkel, S. E. (1991). Discontent & the expected utility of rebellion: The case of Peru. American Political Science Review, 85(December), 1261–1282.Google Scholar
  66. Oxley, Z. M. (2017). Gender and the socialization of party identification. In A. L. Bos & M. C. Schneider (Eds.), The political psychology of women in U.S. politics (pp. 15–33). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Parker, A. (2016). Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton doesn’t have ‘a Presidential Look,’ New York Times, September 6. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/us/politics/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-doesnt-have-a-presidential-look.html?_r=0.
  68. Pew Research Center. (2016). Low Marks for Major Players in 2016 Election—Including the Winner. November 21. Retrieved December 12, 2018 from http://www.people-press.org/2016/11/21/low-marks-for-major-players-in-2016-election-including-the-winner/.
  69. Pew Research Center. (2018). After 2016 election, angry reactions overtook love reactions from the Facebook audience. July 16. Retrieved December 12, from 2018 http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/18/anger-topped-love-facebook-after-2016-election/ft_18-07-18_angerlovereactions_after-2016-election-angry/.
  70. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rappeport, A. (2015). Donald Trump’s Uncomplimentary comments about Carly Fiorina. The New York Times, September 10. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/09/10/donald-trumps-uncomplimentary-comments-about-carly-fiorina/.
  72. Rucker, P. (2015). Trump says Fox’s Megyn Kelly had ‘blood coming out of her wherever.’ The Washington Post, August 6. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/08/07/trump-says-foxs-megyn-kelly-had-blood-coming-out-of-her-wherever/?utm_term=.8fe41479410b.
  73. Sears, D. O. (1983). The persistence of early predispositions. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality & social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 79–116). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Shadmehr, M. (2014). Mobilization, repression, & revolution: Grievances & opportunities in contentious politics. The Journal of Politics, 76(July), 621–635.Google Scholar
  75. Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K. (2008). Of time & partisan polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 52(July), 619–635.Google Scholar
  76. Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(January), 156–170.Google Scholar
  77. Wolbrecht, C. (2018). A woman’s place is in the resistance: Women, gender, & American democracy. Memo prepared for the conference: A republic, If We Can Keep It, Cornell Center for the Study of Inequality and New America, Washington, DC, April 12–13. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://cornell.app.box.com/v/Memo-Wolbrecht.
  78. Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2017). Role models revisited: Youth, novelty, & the impact of female candidates. Politics, Groups, & Identities, 5(3), 418–434.Google Scholar
  79. Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Yates, M. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 620–631.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations