Advertisement

Residential Mobility Constraints and Immigration Restrictionism

  • Yamil Ricardo VelezEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Prevailing theories of public opinion toward immigration posit that responses to immigration are partially a function of local area demographics. However, evaluations of these theories suffer from the critique that local immigration patterns and attitudes toward immigrants are endogenous due to residential self-selection. Recent efforts attempt to address this problem by using experimental designs that reduce the possibility of selection bias. Instead of viewing residential mobility as a source of bias, I develop a theory that treats residential mobility and political behavior as interconnected strategies for responding to demographic change. Across two large sample studies, I find that residents who live in diversifying communities and face residential mobility constraints are more likely to express dissatisfaction with immigration and less likely to report desires to move than those who reside in more exit-friendly destinations.

Keywords

Context Immigration Residential mobility Political behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ben Newman, John Kane, Stanley Feldman, Leonie Huddy, Jason Barabas, Oleg Smirnov, Ryan Enos, Daniel Hopkins, Howard Lavine, Vesla Weaver, Brad Jones, Bryan Wilcox-Archuleta, Eric Kaufmann, Logan Dancey, Erika Franklin Fowler, and Matthew Hall for their helpful comments and feedback. I am also grateful to anonymous reviewers, editors, department colleagues, and discussants for helping improve the manuscript. The author declares that they have no conflict of interest. Data and supporting materials necessary to reproduce the numerical results in the article are available in the Political Behavior Dataverse (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/polbehavior).

Supplementary material

11109_2018_9517_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (290 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 289 kb)

References

  1. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner City. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Baybeck, B. (2006). Sorting out the competing effects of racial context. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobo, L. D., Oliver, M. L., James, H. J., Jr., & Valenzuela, A., Jr. (2000). Prismatic metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles. Ne York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Boehm, T. P., & Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (1991). The revelation of neighborhood preferences: An N-chotomous multivariate probit approach. Journal of Housing Economics, 1(1), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broockman, D., & Kalla, J. (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science 352 (6282). American Association for the Advancement of Science, 352, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain, B. E., Citrin, J., & Wong, C. (2000). Ethnic context, race relations, and california politics. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Citrin, J., Green, D. P., Muste, C., & Wong, C. (1997). Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. The Journal of Politics, 59(3), 858–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Citrin, J., Reingold, B., & Green, D. P. (1990). American identity and the politics of ethnic change. The Journal of Politics, 52(04), 1124–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, W. A. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model. Demography, 28(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, W. R., Golder, M., & Golder, S. N. (2013). Power and politics: Insights from an exit, voice, and loyalty game. University Park: University of Michigan and Penn State University.Google Scholar
  12. Crowder, K., Hall, M., & Tolnay, S. E. (2011). Neighborhood immigration and native out-migration. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dancygier, R. M. (2010). Immigration and conflict in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darmofal, D. (2006). Spatial econometrics and political science. Society for political methodology working paper archive. http://Polmeth.Wustl.Edu/Workingpapers.Php.
  15. Denton, N. A., & Massey, D. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dixon, J. C., & Rosenbaum, M. S. (2004). Nice to know you? Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti-black and anti-hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dustmann, C., & Preston, I. (2001). Attitudes to ethnic minorities, ethnic context and location decisions. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison, C. G., & Powers, D. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among Black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75(2), 385–400.Google Scholar
  19. Enos, R. D. (2014). Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3699–3704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enos, R. D. (2017). The space between US: Social geography and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feijten, P., & Ham, M. (2009). Neighbourhood change…reason to leave? Urban Studies, 46(10), 2103–2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fennelly, K., & Federico, C. (2008). Rural residence as a determinant of attitudes toward US immigration policy. International Migration, 46(1), 151–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fox, J., & Rivera-Salgado, G. (2004). Indigenous Mexican migrants in the United States. La Jolla, CA: Center for US-Mexican Studies, UCSD/Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Frendreis, J., & Tatalovich, R. (1997). Who supports english-only language laws? Evidence from the 1992 National Election Study. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 354–368.Google Scholar
  25. Frey, W. H. (1995). The new geography of population shifts: Trends toward balkanization. State of the Union: America in the 1990s, 2, 271–336.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, W. H. (2006). Diversity spreads out. Washington, DC: Center on Urban Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  27. Giles, H., et al. (1977). Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Glaser, J. M. (1994). Back to the black belt: Racial environment and white racial attitudes in the South. The Journal of Politics, 56(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, M., & Crowder, K. (2014). Native out-migration and neighborhood immigration in new destinations. Demography, 51(6), 2179–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hatton, T. J. (2005). Explaining trends in Uk immigration. Journal of Population Economics, 18(4), 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hood, M. V., III, & Morris, I. L. (1997). ? Amigo O Enemigo?: Context, attitudes, and anglo public opinion toward immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 309–323.Google Scholar
  33. Hood, M. V., III, & Morris, I. L. (1998). Give us your tired, your poor,… but make sure they have a green card: The effects of documented and undocumented migrant context on Anglo opinion toward immigration. Political Behavior, 20(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hopkins, D. J. (2009). The diversity discount: When increasing ethnic and racial diversity prevents tax increases. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hopkins, D. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnston, C. D., Newman, B. J., & Velez, Y. (2015). Ethnic change, personality, and polarization over immigration in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(3), 662–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, B., & Martin, D. J. (2016). Path-to-citizenship or deportation? How elite cues shaped opinion on immigration in the 2010 US house elections. Political Behavior 1–28.Google Scholar
  38. Kaufmann, E. (2017). Levels or changes?: Ethnic context, immigration and the UK Independence party vote. Electoral Studies, 48, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaufmann, E., & Harris, G. (2015). White flight or positive contact? Local diversity and attitudes to immigration in Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 48(12), 1563–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keating, W. (2010). The suburban racial dilemma: Housing and Neighborhoods. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Key, V. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, B. A., Salvador Oropesa, R., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31(2), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margalit, Y. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the great recession. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer, M. F. (1960). The parental figures in residential treatment. The Social Service Review, 34, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman, B. J. (2013). Acculturating contexts and Anglo opposition to immigration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newman, B. J., & Johnson, J. (2012). Ethnic change, concern over immigration, and approval of state government. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12(4), 415–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newman, B. J., & Velez, Y. (2014). Group size versus change? Assessing Americans’ perception of local immigration. Political Research Quarterly, 67(2), 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Orbell, J. M., & Uno, T. (1972). A theory of neighborhood problem solving: political action vs. residential mobility. The American Political Science Review., 66(2), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patana, P. (2018). Changes in local context and electoral support for the populist radical right: Evidence from Finland. Party Politics, 1354068818810283.Google Scholar
  50. Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). A note on Listwise deletion versus multiple imputation. Political Analysis., 26, 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quillian, L. (1996). Group threat and regional change in attitudes toward African-Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 816–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramakrishnan, S. K., & Gulasekaram, P. (2012). Importance of the political in immigration federalism, the. Arizona State Law Journal, 44, 1431.Google Scholar
  54. Rapkin, C., & Grigsby, W. G. (1960). The demand for housing in racially mixed areas. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. National Association Of Realtors. (2013). National Association of Realtors Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers.Google Scholar
  56. Reuveny, R. (2007). Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saiz, A., & Wachter, S. (2011). Immigration and the neighborhood. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(2), 169–188.Google Scholar
  58. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schuman, H., & Bobo, L. (1988). Survey-based experiments on white racial attitudes toward residential integration. American Journal of Sociology, JSTOR, 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Segal, D. S. (1979). The economics of neighborhood. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  61. Sharp, E. B. (1984). Exit, voice, and loyalty in the context of local government problems. The Western Political Quarterly., 37, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stacey, M., Carbone-López, K., & Rosenfeld, R. (2011). Demographic change and ethnically motivated crime: The impact of immigration on anti-Hispanic hate crime in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(3), 278–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steil, J. P., & Vasi, I. B. (2014). The new immigration contestation: Social movements and local immigration policy making in the United States, 2000–2011. American Journal of Sociology, 119(4), 1104–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stein, R. M., Post, S. S., & Rinden, A. L. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53(2), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taub, R. P., Taylor, D. G., & Dunham, J. D. (1984). Paths of neighborhood change: Race and crime in urban America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Taylor, M. C. (1998). How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 62, 512–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of political economy, 64(5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tolbert, C. J. (2001). Dealing with diversity: Racial/ethnic context and social policy change. Political Research Quarterly, 54(3), 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tolbert, C. J., & Grummel, J. A. (2003). Revisiting the racial threat hypothesis: White voter support for california’s proposition 209. State Politics & Policy Quarterly., 3, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tolbert, C. J., & Rodney, E. H. (1996). Race/ethnicity and direct democracy: An analysis of California’s illegal immigration initiative. The Journal of Politics, 58(03), 806–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Velez, Y. R., & Wong, G. (2017). Assessing contextual measurement strategies. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 1084–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waldinger, R. (2018). Immigration and the election of Donald Trump: Why the sociology of migration left us unprepared and why we should not have been surprised. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(8), 1411–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Welch, S., & Sigelman, L. (2000). Getting to know you? Latino-Anglo social contact. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 67–83.Google Scholar
  74. Wolf, E. P. (1963). The tipping-point in racially changing neighborhoods. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 29(3), 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wurdock, C. J. (1981). Neighborhood racial transition: A study of the role of white flight. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yancey, G. (1999). An examination of the effects of residential and church integration on racial attitudes of whites. Sociological Perspectives, 42(2), 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations