Advertisement

Ideology and Gender in U.S. House Elections

  • Danielle M. ThomsenEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Studies of gender-ideology stereotypes suggest that voters evaluate male and female candidates in different ways, yet data limitations have hindered an analysis of candidate ideology, sex, and actual election outcomes. This article draws on a new dataset of male and female primary and general election candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives from 1980 to 2012. I find little evidence that the relationship between ideology and victory patterns differs for male and female candidates. Neither Republican nor Democratic women experience distinct electoral fates than ideologically similar men. Candidate sex and ideology do interact in other ways, however; Democratic women are more liberal than their male counterparts, and they are advantaged in primaries over Republican women as well as Democratic men. The findings have important implications for contemporary patterns of women’s representation, and they extend our understanding of gender bias and neutrality in American elections.

Keywords

Gender Ideology Congressional elections Partisan gap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Previous versions of the article were presented at the annual meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association and the Southern Political Science Association. I am grateful to the Dirksen Congressional Center and the Political Parity Project for their support of the data collection. I thank Rosalyn Cooperman, Melissa Deckman, Chris Faricy, Shana Gadarian, Andy Hall, Katherine Michelmore, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. I am grateful to Spencer Piston for his comments on multiple drafts of the article.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006). Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M., Jr., & Stewart, C., III. (2001). Candidate positioning in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, N. M. (2015). Who stereotypes female candidates? Identifying individual differences in feminine stereotype reliance. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(1), 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonica, A. (2014). Mapping the ideological marketplace. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013). Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, D. W., Han, H., & Pope, J. C. (2007). Primary elections and candidate ideology: out of step with the primary electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks, D. J. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burden, B. (2004). Candidate positioning in U.S. congressional elections. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrell, B. C. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burrell, B. C. (2014). Gender in campaigns for the U.S. House of representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canes-Wrone, B., Brady, D. W., & Cogan, J. F. (2002). Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and house members’ voting. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, S. J. (1994). Women as candidates in American politics (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cassese, E. C., & Holman, M. R. (2017). Party and gender stereotypes in campaign attacks. Political Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, E. A. (1998). Voter reaction to women candidates. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cooperman, R., & Oppenheimer, B. I. (2001). The gender gap in the house of representatives. In L. C. Dodd & B. I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (7th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crowder-Meyer, M., & Lauderdale, B. E. (2014). A partisan gap in the supply of female potential candidates in the United States. Research and Politics, 1(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darcy, R., Welch, S., & Clark, J. (1994). Women, elections, and representation (2nd ed.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ditonto, T., Hamilton, A. J., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). Gender stereotypes, information search, and voting behavior in political campaigns. Political Behavior, 36(2), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolan, K. (2014). When does gender matter? Women candidates and gender stereotypes in American elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dolan, K. A. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  21. Duerst-Lahti, G. (1998). The Bottleneck, women as candidates. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office: Past, present, and future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elder, L. (2008). Whither republican women: The growing partisan gap among women in congress. The Forum, 6(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erikson, R. S., & Wright, G. C., Jr. (2000). Representation of constituency ideology in congress. In D. W. Brady, J. F. Cogan, & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Continuity and change in house elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frederick, B. (2009). Are female house members still more liberal in a polarized era? The conditional nature of the relationship between descriptive and substantive representation. Congress & the Presidency, 36(2), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freeman, J. (1986). The political culture of the democratic and republican parties. Political Science Quarterly, 101(3), 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fulton, S. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and electoral success. Political Research Quarterly, 65(2), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaddie, R. K., & Bullock, C. S., III. (2000). Elections to open seats in the U.S. House: Where the action is. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Grossman, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2015). Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats: The asymmetry of American party politics. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, A. B., & Snyder, J. M. Jr. (2015). Candidate ideology and electoral success. Working Paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, D. (2011). When gender and party collide: Stereotyping in candidate trait attribution. Politics & Gender, 7(2), 133–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. L. (2015). A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayes, D., Lawless, J. L., & Baitinger, G. (2014). Who cares what they wear? Media, gender, and the influence of candidate appearance. Social Science Quarterly, 95(5), 1194–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirano, S., Snyder, J. M., Jr., Ansolabehere, S., & Hansen, J. M. (2010). Primary elections and partisan polarization in the U.S. congress. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holman, M. R., Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2016). Terrorist threat, male stereotypes, and candidate evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2017). Women in National Parliaments, 2017. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm. Accessed June 2017.
  38. Jacobson, G. (2013). The politics of congressional elections (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  39. Jacobson, G. C. (2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in US house elections. Journal of Politics, 77(3), 861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, D., & Matland, R. (2003). Sex and the grand old party: An experimental Investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31(6), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koch, J. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations? American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 414–429.Google Scholar
  42. Koch, J. (2002). Gender stereotypes and citizens’ impressions of house candidates’ ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lawless, J. L. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-september 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lawless, J. L., & Pearson, K. (2008). The primary reason for women’s underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDermott, M. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDermott, M. (1998). Race and gender cues in low information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Milyo, J., & Schosberg, S. (2000). Gender bias and selection bias in house elections. Public Choice, 105(1/2), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osborn, T. L. (2012). How women represent women: Political parties, representation, and gender in the state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2008). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2012). Women & congressional elections: A century of change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  52. Pearson, K., & McGhee, E. (2013). What it takes to win: Questioning ‘gender neutral’ outcomes in U.S. House elections. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pettigrew, S., Owen, K., & Wanless, E. (2014). U.S. House primary election results (1956–2010). Harvard Dataverse, V3.  https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/26448.
  54. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2007). Ideology and congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Scammon, R. M., McGillivray, A. V., & Cook, R. (1990–2006). America votes 19-27: A handbook of contemporary American election statistics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  56. Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35(2), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seltzer, R. A., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
  58. Stone, W. J., & Maisel, L. S. (2003). The not-so-simple calculus of winning: Potential U.S. House candidates’ nomination and general election chances. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 951–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stonecash, J. M., Brewer, M. D., & Mariani, M. D. (2003). Diverging parties: Social change, realignment, and party polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  60. Streb, M. J., Burrell, B., Frederick, B., & Genovese, M. A. (2008). Social desirability effects and support for a female american president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(1), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Swers, M. L. (2014). Representing women’s interests in a polarized congress. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office: past, present, and future (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, S., & Wilcox, C. (1998). Women and elective office: Past, present, and future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Thomsen, D. M. (2015). Why so few (republican) women? Explaining the partisan imbalance of women in the U.S. congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomsen, D. M., & Swers, M. L. (2017). Which women can run? Gender, partisanship, and candidate donor networks. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Welch, S. (1985). Are women more liberal than men in the U.S. congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10(1), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Democratic PoliticsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations