Direct and Indirect Xenophobic Attacks: Unpacking Portfolios of Identity

  • Sergio Garcia-Rios
  • Francisco Pedraza
  • Bryan Wilcox-Archuleta
Original Paper

Abstract

Political threats are typically conceptualized by scholars as targeting particular groups of people. We call for also conceptualizing threats as political attacks directed towards particular facets of an individual’s identity portfolio. We reason that individual political responses to political attacks depend on the strength of identity with the group under attack, just as Social Identity Theory anticipates, but we contend that responses also depends on the shared social categories across an identity portfolio. Drawing on data from 2006–2016, we compare the political assessments of various presidential candidates between Mexican heritage Latinos and other non-Mexican heritage Latinos. Given the specificity of the rhetoric towards Mexican heritage Latinos in 2016, we find evidence that Mexicans and non-Mexicans cast distinct judgments of Donald Trump. Yet, we observe no comparable distinction in prior electoral contexts, suggesting that 2016 uniquely politicized the responses among Mexican heritage Latinos.

Keywords

Social Identity Theory Latino politics Race and ethnic politics Political attitudes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Matt Barreto, Vincent Hutchings, Efrén Peréz, Loren Collingwood, Chinbo Chong, Nicole Yadon, Hannah Walker, Mackenzie Israel Trummel, Hakeem Jefferson, David O. Sears, Angela X. Ocampo, and Tyler Reny for their helpful comments and insight. We also thank the helpful comments and feedback from participants at the 2016 CMPS PRIEC at UCLA, UCLA’s Political Psychology Lab, and the American Politics Working Group at the University of Michigan. Last, we are grateful to the anonymous reviewers. Replication materials are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/UX39M4.

Supplementary material

11109_2018_9465_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (292 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 291 KB)

References

  1. Babu, G. J. (1992). Subsample and half-sample methods. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 44(4), 703–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreto, M., Ramírez, R., & Woods, N. (2005). Are naturalized voters driving the Latino electorate? Measuring the impact of IRCA on Latino voting in California. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 792–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltran, C. (2010). The trouble with unity: Latino politics and the creation of identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, N. M., & Pérez, E. O. (2016). Race and nation: How racial hierarchy shapes national attachments. Political Psychology, 37(4), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra, K. (2012). Constructivist theories of ethnic politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conover, P. (1988). The role of social groups in political thinking. British Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, M. C. (1994). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics (Vol. 7). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking togetheror falling apart: In-group identification as psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. J. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraga, L., & Garcia, J. (2006). Su casa es nuestra casa: Latino politics research and the development of American political science. American Political Science Review, 100(6), 515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraga, L. R., Garcia, J. A., Hero, R., Jones-Correa, M., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Segura, G. M. (2010). Latinos in the new millennium: An almanac of opinion, behavior, and policy preferences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia Bedolla, L. (2005). Fluid borders: Latino power, identity, and politics in Los Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Huddy, L. (2003). Group identity and political cohesion. Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Huddy, L., & Turner, J. (2014). From social to political identity: Examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jimenez, T. R. (2010). Replenished ethnicity: Mexican Americans, immigration, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Laitin, D. D. (1998). Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking populations in the new abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Leach, C. W., Mosquera, P. M. R., Vliek, M. L. W., & Hirt, E. (2010). Group devaluation and group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., et al. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, T. (2008). Race, immigration, and the identity-to-politics link. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masuoka, N. (2006). Together they become one: Examining the predictors of panethnic group consciousness among Asian Americans and Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 993–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mora, G. C. (2014). Making Hispanics: How activists, bureaucrats, and media constructed a new American. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pantoja, A. D., Ramirez, R., & Segura, G. M. (2001). Citizens by choice, voters by necessity: In political mobilization patterns Latinos by naturalized. Political Research Quarterly, 54(4), 729–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pantoja, A. D., Ramirez, R., & Segura, G. M. (2004). Demography and political influence: Disentangling the Latino vote. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, 16, 69–96.Google Scholar
  28. Pérez, E. O. (2015a). Ricochet: How elite discourse politicizes racial and ethnic identities. Political Behavior, 37(1), 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pérez, E. O. (2015b). Xenophobic rhetoric and its political effects on immigrants and their co-ethnics. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Posner, D. N. (2004). The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramírez, R. (2013). Mobilizing opportunities: State contexts, mobilization and the evolving Latino electorate. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  33. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanchez, G. R., & Masuoka, N. (2010). Brown-utility heuristic? The presence and contributing factors of Latino linked fate. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32(4), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shao, J., & Xhi, X. (1989). Half-sample variance estimation. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 18(11), 4197–4210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.Google Scholar
  37. Tate, K. (1993). From protest to politics: The new black voters in American elections. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 347–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valenzuela, A. A., & Michelson, M. R. (2016). Turnout, status, and identity: Mobilizing Latinos to vote with group appeals. American Political Science Review, 110(04), 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vargas, E. D., Sanchez, G. R., & Valdez, J. A. (2017). Immigration policies and group identity: How immigrant laws affect linked fate among U.S. Latino populations. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 2, 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilcox-Archuleta, B. Local origins: Group identity, context, and the politics of place. Political Research Quarterly. (in press).Google Scholar
  42. Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and Latina/o StudiesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political Science and Public PolicyUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations