Abstract
We use original survey data from Malaysia to explore differences in how traditional and digital media shape the attitudes and behavior of citizens. In closed, and even semi-authoritarian, states such as Malaysia, the Internet, including social media, is often the only place for opposition-centered media to thrive. As a result, consumption of Internet media is related to dissident attitudes. We argue that this relationship, though, is mitigated by trust in the medium. Our results suggest: (1) trust in traditional and Internet media determines the frequency with which citizens use each corresponding medium to gather political information, (2) higher trust in traditional media is positively associated with attitudes about democratic conditions in Malaysia; the opposite is true for trust in Internet media, (3) trust in the traditional media is negatively related, and trust in Internet media is positively related to the inclination to protest, (4) the positive relationship between digital media consumption and this attitude is stronger for those who trust Internet media, and diminished among those who trust traditional media.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 October 2019
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The gender dummy variable was mistakenly coded in reverse order. The interpretation treated it as (0 = Male, 1 = Female), while the actual coding was (0 = Female, 1 = Male). This had no influence on the substantive results for all other variables. The sign on the coefficients for the female dummy in Tables 2, 3, and 4 should be negative. The word “females” should be “males” on page 414, and “women” should be “men” on page 416.
Notes
The data and replication code are available on the Political Behavior Dataverse page https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/polbehavior.
While the rate of missingness across the variables used here was generally low (less than 2 percent for the majority of indicators), we decided to use multiple imputation to replace any missing values to prevent possible bias in our estimates. The imputation model was based on all of the variables utilized in the present study assuming a multivariate normal distribution. Five replicate datasets were created where the missing data in each replication are substituted with draws from the posterior distribution of the missing value conditional on observed values (Little and Rubin 2014). The models that follow are based on pooled results of the five replicate datasets.
These are all opposition outlets which helps our index pick up on trust aimed specifically at the news sources that run counter to the state-controlled media.
References
Abbott, J. P. (2015). Hype or hubris? the political impact of the Internet and social networking in Southeast Asia. In W. Case (Ed.), The routledge handbook of southeast asian democratization (pp. 201–222). London: Routledge.
Abbott, J. P., & Givens, J. W. (2015). Strategic censorship in a hybrid authoritarian regime? Differential bias in Malaysia’s online and print media. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(3), 455–478.
Bailard, C. S. (2014). Democracy’s double-edged sword: How internet use changes citizens’ views of their government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barber, B. R. (2001). The uncertainty of digital politics. Harvard International Review, 23(1), 42–47.
Bimber, B. (1994). Three faces of technological determinism. In R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? the dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 79–100). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., Porro, G., et al. (2010). CEM: coarsened exact matching in stata. Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546.
Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking it to the Polls: a study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(4), 352–369.
Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? a meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication and Society, 18(5), 524–538.
Brynin, M., & Newton, K. (2003). The national press and voting turnout: british general elections of 1992 and 1997. Political Communication, 20(1), 59–77.
Chadwick, A., & Howard, P. N. (2010). Routledge handbook of internet politics. London: Routledge.
Corrado, A., & Firestone, C. M. (Eds.). (1996). Elections in cyberspace: towards a new era in american politics. Washington DC: Aspen Institute.
Esarey, J. (2015). Causal inference with observational data. In J. Bachner, K. W. Hill, & B. Ginsberg (Eds.), Analytics, policy, and governance (pp. 40–66). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Feezell, J. T. (2016). Predicting online political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 3, 495–509.
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2011). Rebooting American politics: the internet revolution. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gainous, J., Wagner, K. M., Abbott, J. P., et al. (2015). Civic disobedience: does internet use stimulate political unrest in East-Asia? Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 12(2), 219–236.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S., et al. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. G., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421.
Gomez, J. (2014). Social media impact on Malaysia’s 13th general election. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 95–105.
Hindman, M. (2008). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hopmann, D. N. (2015). Contagious media effects: how media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 776–798.
Howard, P. N. (2011). The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.
Iacus, S., King, G., Porro, G., et al. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24.
Ladd, J. M. (2011). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liow, J. C. (2012). Malaysia’s March 2008 general election: understanding the new media factor. The Pacific Review, 25(3), 293–315.
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Statistical analysis with missing data. NY: John Wiley and Sons.
McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., et al. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: the role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political communication, 16(3), 315–336.
Müller, J. (2013). Mechanisms of trust: News media in democratic and authoritarian regimes. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Norris, P. (2001). The digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., Dempsey, G. R., et al. (1987). What moves public opinion? American Political Science Review, 81(1), 23–43.
Pasek, J., More, E., Romer, D., et al. (2009). Realizing the social internet? online social networking meets offline civic engagement. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(3/4), 197–215.
Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., Fortman, K. K., et al. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42(1), 34–49.
Prior, M. (2007). Post—broadcast democracy: how media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Schedler, A. (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. London: Lynne Reinner.
Tang, Jiliang, & Liu, H. (2015). Trust in social media. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.
Tsfati, Y. (2010). Online news exposure and trust in the mainstream media: exploring possible associations. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(1), 22–42.
Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., Pingree, R. J., et al. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520–535.
Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior the roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942.
Valenzuela, S., Somma, N. M., Scherman, A., & Arriagada, A. (2016). Social media in Latin America: Deepening or bridging gaps in protest participation? Online Information Review, 40(5), 695–711.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper and Row.
Wagner, K. M., & Gainous, J. (2013). Digital uprising: the Internet revolution in the Middle East. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 10(3), 261–275.
Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718.
Xenos, M., Vromen, A., Loader, B. D., et al. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication and Society, 17(2), 151–167.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Amanzhol Bekmagambetov, Ben Epstein and Michael James Jensen for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gainous, J., Abbott, J.P. & Wagner, K.M. Traditional Versus Internet Media in a Restricted Information Environment: How Trust in the Medium Matters. Polit Behav 41, 401–422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9456-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9456-6