Does Intolerance Dampen Dissent? Macro-Tolerance and Protest in American Metropolitan Areas
Political tolerance has long been regarded as one of the most important democratic values because intolerant political cultures are believed to foster conformity and inhibit dissent. Although widely endorsed, this theory has rarely been investigated. Using multilevel regression with poststratification to measure levels of macro-tolerance in U.S. metropolitan areas, and event data to measure rates of protest, we test whether cultures of intolerance do indeed inhibit public expressions of dissent. We find that they do: levels of macro-tolerance are positively and strongly associated with higher rates of protest in American metropolitan areas. Our findings have implications for the study of political tolerance, for normative theories of free speech and other civil liberties, and for scholarship on protest and collective action.
KeywordsPolitical tolerance Dissent Protest Political culture Multilevel regression with poststratification
This research was made possible by a Grant from the National Science Foundation to Gibson (“Creating a State-Level Public Opinion Data Base for Law and Courts Scholarship: New Frontiers in Research on the Public’s Views of Third Branch Politics,” SES 1228619). The Freedom and Tolerance Surveys upon which this paper relies were funded by the Weidenbaum Center at Washington University in St. Louis. We greatly appreciate the support provided for this research by Steven S. Smith, Director of the Center. We also appreciate the thoughtful comments and suggestions provided by Adam Green, George Marcus, Lauren McLaren, David Muchlinski, Neil Munro, Niccole Pamphilis, Mark Peffley, Paul Sniderman, and Karen Wright on an earlier version of the paper. Replication materials are available on the Political Behavior Dataverse ( https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OUAYYH).
- Ackerman, B. A., & Fishkin, J. S. (2004). Deliberation day. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Davis, D. W. (2007). Negative liberty: Public opinion and the terrorist attacks on America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gelman, A., & Little, T. C. (1997). Poststratification into many categories using hierarchical logistic regression. Survey Methodology, 23(2), 127–135.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. L., & Bingham, R. D. (1985). Civil liberties and Nazis: The Skokie free-speech controversy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. L., & Gouws, A. (2003). Overcoming intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in democratic persuasion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, R. J. (1978). Political Repression in Modern America: From 1870 to the Present. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall & Co.Google Scholar
- Hanna, A. (2014). Developing a system for the automated coding of protest event data. Social Science Research Network, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2425232.
- Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Leetaru, K., & Schrodt, P. A. (2013). GDELT: Global data on events, location and tone, 1979–2012. GDELT Project, http://data.gdeltproject.org/documentation/ISA.2013.GDELT.pdf.
- Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2015). The coddling of the American mind. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/. Accessed 3 May 2016.
- Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Nunn, C. Z., Crockett, H. J., & Williams, J. A. (1978). Tolerance for nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Stouffer, S. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J. E., & Marcus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Ward, M. D., Beger, A., Cutler, J., Dickenson, M., Dorff, C., & Radford. B. (2013). Comparing GDELT and ICEWS event data. ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303211430_Comparing_GDELT_and_ICEWS_event_data.
- Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar