Electoral Discrimination Against Immigrant-Origin Candidates
- 697 Downloads
This article explores the Electoral Discrimination thesis, according to which voters tend to discriminate against minority candidates. The free-list PR system used in Swiss elections—which allows voters to cast negative preference votes against candidates they do not want to support—offers a unique opportunity to test this thesis. Specifically, we analyze the relationship between immigrant-origin candidates bearing non-Swiss names and the negative preference votes allocated by voters to single candidates. Using a novel research strategy, based on election data stemming from our analysis of real ballots cast in the 2014 local elections in the Canton of Zurich, the article shows that candidates with non-Swiss names incur a significant electoral penalty. The effects of Electoral Discrimination are stronger, however, among supporters of parties from the Right and Center-Right. Interestingly, candidates bearing non-Swiss but Western names do not fare better than candidates with names of non-Western origin. We argue that our results have important implications for the comparative literature interested in electoral systems and minority representation.
KeywordsElectoral systems Electoral behavior Minority representation Immigrant-origin minorities Discrimination
We thank Daniel Diaz and Corine Truxius for their assistance in coding, and Luca Gambazzi for his support with data processing. We are grateful to Edith Wiederkehr and Beat Lutta from the Zurich cantonal statistical office for kindly providing us access to the electoral software. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the MPSA 2016 Annual Conference in Chicago, the ECPR 2016 Joint Sessions in Pisa, the IPSA 2016 World Congress of Political Science in Poznan, and at seminars held in November 2016 at the University of Lucerne and the University of Neuchâtel. We thank the participants at these events for their feedback. We also thank Andrea de Angelis, Marc Bühlmann, Lucas Leemann, Didier Ruedin, Andreas Schädel and Oliver Strijbis for their very helpful written comments. Last but not least, we gratefully acknowledge Peter Cook’s excellent assistance in editing the text and the financial support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Number PZ00P1_154983).
- Ahmed, A. (2013). Democracy and the politics of electoral system choice. Engineering electoral dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Auer, D., Bonoli, G., & Fossati, F. (2015). It’s discrimination, stupid: Labour market (re-) entry difficulties among different immigrant groups in Switzerland. (“NCCR On the Move” Working Paper No. 2, June 2015). Retrieved September 21, 2017 from http://nccr-onthemove.ch/wp_live14/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/nccrotm-WPS2-Auer-Bonoli-Fossati.pdf.
- Barth, S. K., Mittag, N., & Park, K. H. (2017). Marginal voters and their racial prejudice. Retrieved September 21, 2017 from http://home.cerge-ei.cz/mittag/papers/minority_disadvantage.pdf.
- Bird, K., Saalfeld, T., & Wüst, A. (Eds.). (2010). The political representation of immigrants and minorities: Voters, parties and parliaments in liberal democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Black, J. (2008). Ethnoracial minorities in the 38th parliament: Patterns of change and continuity. In C. Andrew, J. Biles, M. Siemiatycki, & E. Tolley (Eds.), Electing a diverse Canada: The representation of immigrants, minorities and women (pp. 229–254). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
- Blank, R. M., Marilyn, D., & Citro, C. F. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring racial discrimination. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Brouard, S., & Tiberj, V. (2011). Yes they can: An experimental approach to the eligibility of ethnic minority candidates in France. In K. Bird, T. Saalfeld, & A. Wüst (Eds.), The political representation of immigrants and minorities. Voters, parties and parliaments (pp. 164–180). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cribari-Neto, F., & Zeileis, A. (2009). Beta regression in R. Retrieved September 21, 2017 from http://epub.wu.ac.at/726/.
- Eurostat. 2011. Migrants in Europe: A statistical portrait of the first and second generation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved September 21, 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5727749/KS-31-10-539-EN.PDF/bcf27a60-7016-4fec-98c5-e8488491ebbd.
- Fibbi, R. (2006). Discrimination dans l’accès à l’emploi des jeunes d’origine immigrée en Suisse. Formation emploi, 94, 45–58.Google Scholar
- Fossati, F., Liechti, F., Auer, D., & Bonoli, G. (2017). Discrimination multipliers. How immigrant’s integration affects labour market disadvantage. MIM Working Paper Series, 17(2). Retrieved November 21, 2017 from https://www.mah.se/upload/Forskningscentrum/MIM/WPS%2017.2%20%20Fossatti.pdf.
- Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hellman, D. (2008). When is discrimination wrong? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hellmann, D., & Moreau, S. (Eds.). (2013). Philosophical foundations of discrimination law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hermann, M., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Atlas der politischen Landschaften. Zurich: vdf.Google Scholar
- Hine, D. (2006). Electoral systems, party law and the protection of minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved September 21, 2017 from https://rm.coe.int/1680097cab.
- IDEA (2005). Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: IDEA. Retrieved September 21, 2017 from http://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/electoral-system-design-the-new-international-idea-handbook.pdf.
- Klingemann, H. D. (Ed.). (2009). The comparative study of electoral systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (Ed.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of the ethics of discrimination. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lutz, G. (2011). Open ballot. In J. M. Colomer (Ed.), Personal representation. The neglected dimension of electoral systems (pp. 153–174). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
- Matland, R. E. (2005). Enhancing women’s political participation: Legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In J. Ballington & A. Karam (Eds.), Women in parliaments: Beyond numbers (pp. 93–111). Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
- Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ruedin, D. (2013). Why aren’t they there? The political representation of women, ethnic groups and issue positions in legislatures. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
- Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). The role of heuristics in political reasoning: A theory sketch. In P. M. Sniderman, A. B. Richard, & P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology (pp. 14–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Soltas, E. J., & Broockman, D. E. (2017). A natural experiment on taste-based racial and ethnic discrimination in elections. (Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper, Nr. 3499). Retrieved September 21, 2017 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2919664.
- Wanner, P., & Steiner, I. (2012). La naturalisation en Suisse. Evolution 1992–2010. Berne: Federal Commission for Migration. Retrieved March 28, 2017 from https://www.ekm.admin.ch/dam/data/ekm/dokumentation/materialien/mat_einbuerg_f.pdf.