From Respondents to Networks: Bridging Between Individuals, Discussants, and the Network in the Study of Political Discussion
Much of our understanding of social influence in individual political behavior stems from representative surveys asking respondents to identify characteristics of a small number of people they talk to most frequently. By focusing only on these few close contacts, we have implicitly assumed that less-intimate associates and features of network structure hold little influence over others’ attitudes and behavior. We test these assumptions with a survey that attempted to interview all students at a small university during a highly-salient municipal election. By focusing on a small, well-defined community, we are able to explore the relationship between individuals, their close associates, and also less-immediate associates. We are also able to explore features of network structure unobtainable in representative samples. We demonstrate that these less-immediate associates and network features have the potential to exert important influence that conventional survey approaches would miss.
KeywordsPolitical discussion Social networks Egocentric networks Name-generator survey batteries Attitudes Political behavior
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ansolabehere, S., & Hersh, E. (2010). The quality of voter registration records: A state-by-state analysis. Cambridge, MA: Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project Report. http://www.vote.caltech.edu/content/qualityvoter-registration-records-state-state-analysis.
- Berelson, B. F., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jan, E. L., & Nagler, J. (2013). Who votes now?: Demographics, issues, inequality, and turnout in the United States. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Key, V. O., Jr. (1949). Southern politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of Pluralism. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. F., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Tingsten, H. (1963). Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. London: P.S. King.Google Scholar
- Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar