The Gag Reflex: Disgust Rhetoric and Gay Rights in American Politics
- 278 Downloads
Political scientists have increasingly looked to the role that disgust plays in shaping public opinion and attitudes. This emotion plays an important role in building and reinforcing boundaries in the polity. It is particularly important in shaping attitudes toward gay rights. We analyze data from the 1993 American National Election Studies (ANES) data and two original studies. We find that disgust is a powerful but contingent rhetorical tool. It can powerfully shape public attitudes, especially on issues of sexual purity, but that efficacy must come with a strong caveat: our findings show that some members of the public will reject disgust rhetoric as an indignant reaction against the speaker.
KeywordsDisgust Emotion Gay rights Rhetoric
The authors are listed in alphabetical order. We would like to thank Aaron Hoffman, Seth Jolly, Dan McDowell, Spencer Piston, Josh Thompson, participants at Purdue University, the Moynihan Research Workshop, and the Midwest Political Science Association 2014 annual meeting for feedback on earlier versions of this paper. We also owe thanks to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their feedback and subsequent improvements to the paper. Finally, we thank the Department of Political Science and the Maxwell School at Syracuse University for their support of this project.
- Ayres-Deets, A. (2013). Ben Carson compares homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia. Mic. Retrieved from https://mic.com/articles/31809/ben-carson-compares-homosexuality-to-bestiality-and-pedophilia#.2A2UigvcQ.
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brewer, P. R. (2007). Value war: Public opinion and the politics of gay rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Canaday, M. (2009). The straight state: Sexuality and citizenship in twentieth-century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Casey, L. S. (2016). The politics of disgust: Public opinion toward LGBTQ people and policies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Devlin, P. (1965). The enforcement of morals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, M. (2003). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Eskridge, W. N. (2008). Dishonorable passions: Sodomy laws in America, 1861–2003. Penguin.Google Scholar
- Fisher, S. (2009). It takes (at least) two to tango: Fighting with words in the conflict over same-sex marriage. In S. Barclay, M. Bernstein, & A. M. Marshall (Eds.), Queer mobilizations: LGBT activists confront the law. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Geller, W. W. (1991). Attitudes toward gays and lesbians: A longitudinal study (p. 340970). ED: Eric Documents.Google Scholar
- GLAAD. (2016) Accelerating Acceptance 2016. GLAAD. Retrieved from http://www.glaad.org/publications/accelerating-acceptance-2016.
- Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2009). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2014). Pollution and Purity in moral and political judgment. In H. Sarkissian & J. C. Wright (Eds.), Advances in experimental psychology. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to civil rights: The Supreme Court and the struggle for racial equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Klarman, M. J. (2012). From the closet to the altar: Courts, backlash, and the struggle for same-sex marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Morone, J. A. (2004). Hellfire nation: The politics of sin in American history. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). From disgust to humanity: Sexual orientation and constitutional law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Solomon, M. (2014). Winning marriage: The inside story of how same-sex couples took on the politicians and pundits-and won. New York: ForeEdge.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R., & Kahneman, D. (2007). Indignation Psychology, Politics, Law. Working paper. Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/263/.
- Wong, C. M. (2015). Pat Robertson: Gay Marriage Is “Unnatural” Because No One Has Conceived A Child Through Anal Sex. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/06/pat-robertston-gay-sex-procreation_n_7011742.htmlGoogle Scholar