Incognizance and Perceptual Deviation: Individual and Institutional Sources of Variation in Citizens’ Perceptions of Party Placements on the Left–Right Scale

  • John H. Aldrich
  • Gregory S. Schober
  • Sandra Ley
  • Marco Fernandez
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11109-017-9406-8

Cite this article as:
Aldrich, J.H., Schober, G.S., Ley, S. et al. Polit Behav (2017). doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9406-8
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we use comparative study of electoral systems data to understand the variation in citizens’ perceptions of political party placements on the left–right scale. We estimate multilevel models to assess the extent to which individual characteristics, party characteristics, and institutional designs contribute to variability observed in citizens’ perceptions of party placements. Because lack of information on the part of the citizens may be revealed through failure to respond to the left–right scale questions or through random components to actual placements, we develop models that include assessments of both types of responses to reduce bias from considering only one source. We find that individual-, party-, and institutional-level variables are relevant to understanding variation in citizens’ perceptions of party placements. Finally, we demonstrate that an inability to cognize the left–right scale (incognizance) and a deviation in the perceptions of party positions (perceptual deviation) have important consequences for citizens’ thermometer evaluations of political parties.

Keywords

Political parties Party placement Ideology 

Supplementary material

11109_2017_9406_MOESM1_ESM.docx (72 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 72 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  3. 3.Division of Political StudiesCIDEMexico CityMexico
  4. 4.School of GovernmentITESMMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations