Political Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 3–19 | Cite as

The Impact of Procedural Information Costs on Voting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Chile

  • Alejandro CorvalanEmail author
  • Paulo Cox
Original Paper


This paper uses a natural experiment to identify the effect of a procedural information cost on the electoral registration of young first-time voters. We exploit the fact that information about when the minimum age eligibility requirement is due, either at registration or election-day, is only meaningful for those turning 18 after registration closing day. Using a national dataset on Chilean registration over four elections, we provide evidence of a sharp discontinuity in the registration rate of those youngsters turning 18 at closing date. The effect is both sizable and robust, persists over time, and is similar across income groups.


Registration costs Information acquisition Political participation Voting habits 



The authors are grateful to Loreto Cox, Eduardo Engel and Alfredo Joignant for their helpful comments and suggestions. We thank Pedro Cayul for outstanding research assistance. Corvalan acknowledges financial support from the Millennium Institute for Research in Market Imperfections and Public Policy, ICM IS130002, Chile. We thank Florencia Torche for sharing birth rates data with us.


  1. Aldrich, J. H., Montgomery, J. M., & Wood, W. (2011). Turnout as a Habit. Political Behavior, 33(4), 535–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braconnier, C., Dormagen, J. Y., & Pons, V. (2014). Voter registration costs and disenfranchisement: Experimental evidence from France. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, H. E., & McNulty, J. E. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burden, B. C., & Neiheisel, J. R. (2013). Election administration and the pure effect of voter registration on turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Contreras, G., Joignant, A., & Morales, M. (2016). The return of censitary suffrage? The effects of automatic voter registration and voluntary voting in Chile. Democratization, 23(3), 520–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coppock, A. & Green, D. P. (2015). Is voting habit forming? New evidence suggests that habit-formation varies by election type. American Journal of Political Science, In press.Google Scholar
  8. Corvalan, A., & Cox, P. (2013). Class biased electoral participation: The youth vote in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society, 55(3), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feddersen, T. J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1996). The Swing voter’s curse. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 408–424.Google Scholar
  10. Gelman, A., & Imbens, G. (2014). Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. w20405. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  11. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Schachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 3(47), 540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghirardato, P., & Katz, J. (2006). Indecision theory: Weight of evidence and voting behavior. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(3), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Highton, B. (2004). Voter registration and turnout in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 2(3), 564–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkins, D. J. (2011). Translating into votes: The electoral impacts of Spanish-language ballots. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 814–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Imbens, G. W., & Kalyanaraman, K. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 933–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knack, S., & White, J. (2000). Election-day registration and turnout inequality. Political Behavior, 22(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larcinese, V. (2007). Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British General Election. Public Choice, 131(3–4), 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lassen, D. D. (2005). The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, D. S., & Card, D. (2008). Regression discontinuity inference with specification error. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leon, G. (2015). Turnout, political preferences and information: Experimental evidence from Peru. BREAD Working Paper No. 376.Google Scholar
  22. Matsusaka, J. (1995). Explaining voter turnout patterns: An information theory. Public Choice, 84, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meredith, M. (2009). Persistence in political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4(3), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell, G. E., & Wlezien, C. (1995). The impact of legal constraints on voter registration, turnout, and the composition of the American electorate. Political Behavior, 17(2), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morton, R., Muller, B., Page, D., & Torgler, B. (2015). Exit polls, turnout, and bandwagon voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. European Economic Review, 77(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nickerson, D. (2015). Do voter registration drives increase participation? For whom and when? The Journal of Politics, 1(77), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenstone, S. J., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1978). The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 72(1), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skovron, C., & Titiunik, R. (2015). A practical guide to regression discontinuity designs in political science. working paper.Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, P., & Poole, K. T. (1987). The relationship between information, ideology, and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Timpone, R. J. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review, 119, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolfinger, R. E., Highton, B., & Mullin, M. (2005). How post-registration laws affect the turnout of citizens registered to vote. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 5(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who Votes? Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic DepartmentUniversidad Diego PortalesSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Banco Central de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations