Political Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 133–156 | Cite as

Reprecincting and Voting Behavior

  • Brian Amos
  • Daniel A. SmithEmail author
  • Casey Ste. Claire
Original Paper


Despite the expansion of convenience voting across the American states, millions of voters continue to cast ballots at their local precincts on Election Day. We argue that those registered voters who are reassigned to a different Election Day polling place prior to an election are less likely to turn out to vote than those assigned to vote at the same precinct location, as a new precinct location incurs both search and transportation costs on reassigned voters. Utilizing voter file data and precinct shape files from Manatee County, Florida, from before and after the 2014 General Election, we demonstrate that the redrawing of precinct boundaries and the designation of Election Day polling places is not a purely technical matter for local election administrators, but may affect voter turnout of some registered voters more than others. Controlling for a host of demographic, partisan, vote history, and geospatial factors, we find significantly lower turnout among registered voters who were reassigned to a new Election Day precinct compared to those who were not, an effect not equally offset by those voters turning to other available modes of voting (either early in-person or absentee). All else equal, we find that registered Hispanic voters were significantly more likely to abstain from voting as a result of being reassigned than any other racial group.


Voter turnout Precincts Gerrymandering Elections Florida Election Administration 

Supplementary material

11109_2016_9350_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)


  1. Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, J. H., et al. (2011). Turnout as a habit. Political Behavior, 33, 535–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreto, M., et al. (2006). Controversies in exit polling: Implementing a racially stratified homogenous precinct approach. PS. Political Science & Politics, 39, 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, M. 2014. Memo to Board of County Commissioners. Manatee County Supervisor of Elections Office. February 1. Available:,%202014%20-%20Regular%20Meeting%20on%20Tuesday,%20February%2011,%202014/7E079A9C-1EB6-4AAA-B7DA-3C5D4E57195C.pdf.
  5. Berinsky, A. J. (2005). The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research, 33, 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggers, D. R., & Hanmer, M. J. (2015). Who makes voting convenient? Explaining the adoption of early and no-excuse absentee voting in the American States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 15, 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). CEM: Coarsened exact matching in stata. The Stata Journal, 9, 524–546.Google Scholar
  9. Brady, H. E., & McNulty, J. E. (2004). The costs of voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. Palo Alto, CA: Annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology.Google Scholar
  10. Brady, H. E., & McNulty, J. E. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2014). Election laws, mobilization, and turnout: The unanticipated consequences of election reform. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Census Bureau. 2013. Geocoding Using ArcGIS and & TIGER/Line Shapefiles.
  13. Cox, G. W., & Johnathan, N. K. (2002). Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyck, J. J., & Gimpel, J. G. (2005). Distance, turnout, and the convenience of voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, M. (2005). Greater convenience but not greater turnout. American Politics Research, 33, 842–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., & Shaw, D. R. (2006). Location, knowledge and time pressures in the spatial structure of convenience voting. Electoral Studies, 25, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gimpel, J. G., & Schuknecht, J. E. (2003). Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box. Political Geography, 22, 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grofman, B., & Liphart, A. (Eds.). (1986). Electoral laws & their political consequences. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gronke, P. (2008). Early voting reforms and American elections. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 17, 423–451.Google Scholar
  22. Gronke, P., & Miller, P. (2012). Voting by mail and turnout in Oregon: Revisiting Southwell and Burchett. American Politics Research, 40, 976–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanmer, M. J., & Traugott, M. W. (2004). The impact of voting by mail on voter behavior. American Politics Research, 32, 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasen, R. L. (2012). The voting wars: From Florida 2000 to the next election meltdown. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haspel, M., & Knotts, H. G. (2005). Location, location, location: Precinct placement and the costs of voting. Journal of Politics, 67, 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herron, M. C., & Daniel A. S. 2016. Race, Shelby County, and the voter information verification act in North Carolina. Florida State University Law Review.Google Scholar
  27. Herron, M. C., & Smith, D. A. (2012). Souls to the polls: Early voting in Florida in the shadow of house bill 1355. Election Law Journal, 11, 331–347.Google Scholar
  28. Herron, M. C., & Smith, D. A. (2013). House bill 1355 and voter registration in Florida. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 13, 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herron, M. C., & Smith, D. A. (2014). Race, party, and the consequences of restricting early voting in Florida in the 2012 general election. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 646–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hicks, W. D., et al. (2015). A principle or a strategy? Voter identification laws and partisan competition in the American States. Political Research Quarterly, 68, 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iacus, S. M., Gary K., & Giuseppe P. 2008. Matching for causal inference without balance checking. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1152391.
  32. Kennedy, S. 2014. Plan to t 30 manatee county polling locations fuels outcry. Bradenton Herald. 11 February. Available:
  33. Kimball, D., Kropf, M., & Battles, L. (2006). Helping America vote? Election administration, partisanship, and provisional voting in the 2004 election. Election Law Journal, 5, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDonald, M. P. 2009. The return of the voter: Voter turnout in the 2008 presidential election. The Forum 6: Article 4.Google Scholar
  36. Neeley, G. W., & Richardson, L. R. (2001). Who is early voting? An individual level examination. Social Science Journal, 38, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(01), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scher, R. K. (2011). The politics of disenfranchisement. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  41. Sharockman, A. 2011. Think we have it tough? In Africa, people walk up to 300 miles to vote, GOP senator says. 6 May. Available:
  42. Southwell, P. L., & Burchett, J. I. (2000). The effect of all-mail elections on voter turnout. American Politics Quarterly, 28, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stein, R. M. (1998). Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stein, R. M., Jan L., & Christopher O. 2005. Who votes, who doesn’t, why and, what can be done? A report to the Federal Commission on Electoral Reform.Google Scholar
  45. Stein, R. M. & Andrew M. 2014. The evolving modes of voting: How voters choose when and where to vote. Midwest Political Science Association, April 3–6, Chicago.Google Scholar
  46. Stein, R. M., & Vonnahme, G. (2010). Voting early but not often enough. In J. E. Leighley (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior (pp. 182–199). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Streb, M. (Ed.). (2012). Law and election politics: The Rules of the game (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Thomson, R. 2012. Tell the Truth, Screw the Politics. Business Observer Florida. 11 May. Available:
  49. Wallace, J. 2012. Dent Shrinking Number of Voting Precincts. Sarasota Herald-Tribune. 6 May. Available:
  50. Wang, T. A. (2012). The politics of voter suppression: Defending and expanding Americans’ right to vote. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes?. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Amos
    • 1
  • Daniel A. Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Casey Ste. Claire
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations