Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 769–791 | Cite as

Residential Mobility and Turnout: The Relevance of Social Costs, Timing and Education

  • Jonas Hedegaard HansenEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Residential mobility has substantial negative effects on voter turnout. However, existing studies have been unable to disentangle whether this is due to social costs, informational costs or convenience costs that are related to re-registration. This article analyzes the relevance of the different costs by studying the effect of moving and reassignment to a new polling station in an automatic registration context and using a register-based panel dataset with validated turnout for 2.1 million citizens. The negative effect of moving on turnout does not differ substantially depending on the distance moved from the old neighborhood and it does not matter if citizens change municipality. Thus, the disruption of social ties is the main explanation for the negative effect of moving on turnout. Furthermore, the timing of residential mobility is important as the effect on turnout declines quickly after settling down. This illustrates that large events in citizens’ everyday life close to Election Day can distract them from going to the polling station. Finally, residential mobility mostly affects the turnout of less educated citizens. Consequentially, residential mobility increases inequalities in voter participation, which can be viewed as a democratic problem.

Keywords

Voter turnout Costs of voting Participation Reassignment of polling stations Inequality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the editor, the anonymous reviewers and workshop participants at the Centre for Voting and Parties at the University of Copenhagen in October 2014 and at the Midwest Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting 2015 for their useful comments. I have furthermore received valuable comments from Barry Burden, Benjamin Highton, Hanna Wass, Jørgen Elklit, Kasper Møller Hansen and Yosef Bhatti. The project has received funding from the Danish Council for Independent Research (Grant No. 12-124983).

Supplementary material

11109_2016_9333_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (161 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 161 kb)

References

  1. Aldrich, J. H., Montgomery, J. M., & Wood, W. (2011). Turnout as a habit. Political Behavior, 33(4), 535–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., Hersh, E., & Shepsle, K. (2012). Movers, stayers, and registration: Why age is correlated with registration in the U.S. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhatti, Y. (2012). Distance and voting: Evidence from Danish municipalities. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatti, Y., & Hansen, K. M. (2010). Valgdeltagelsen ved kommunalvalget 17. november 2009. Beskrivende analyser af valgdeltagelsen baseret på registerdata. Arbejdspapir Københavns Universitet, Institut for Statskundskab, 2010(3).Google Scholar
  5. Bhatti, Y. & Hansen, K. M. 2013. The effect of co-residence on turnout. MPSA Annual Conference 2013. Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K. M., & Wass, H. (2012). The relationship between age and turnout: A roller-coaster ride. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 588–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2014a). Kan man øge valgdeltagelsen? Analyse af mobiliseringstiltag ved kommunalvalget den 19. november 2013 København: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
  8. Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2014b). Hvem stemte og hvem blev hjemme? Valgdeltagelsen ved kommunalvalget 19. november 2013. Beskrivende analyser af valgdeltagelsen baseret på registerdata. København: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns UniversitetGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2015). How voter mobilization from short text messages travels within households and families: Evidence from two nationwide field experiments. Midwest Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting 2015. Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote?: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blais, A., Young, R., & Lapp, M. (2000). The calculus of voting: An empirical test. European Journal of Political Research, 37(2), 181–201.Google Scholar
  13. Bowers, J. (2004). Does moving disrupt campaign activity? Political Psychology, 25(4), 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brady, H., & Mcnulty, J. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(02), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coppock, A., & Green, D. P. (2015). Is voting habit forming? New evidence from experiments and regression discontinuities. American Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12210.
  17. Cutts, D., Fieldhouse, E., & John, P. (2009). Is voting habit forming? The longitudinal impact of a GOTV campaign in the UK. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties, 19(3), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Denny, K., & Doyle, O. (2008). Political interest, cognitive ability and personality: Determinants of voter turnout in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 38(02), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowding, K., John, P., & Rubenson, D. (2012). Geographic mobility, social connections and voter turnout. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties, 22(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  22. Dyck, J. J., & Gimpel, J. G. (2005). Distance, turnout, and the convenience of voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elklit, J., Møller, B., Svensson, P., & Togeby, L. (2005). Gensyn med sofavælgerne. Valgdeltagelse i Danmark, Århus: Århus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  24. Fenster, M. J. (1994). The impact of allowing day of registration voting on turnout in US elections from 1960 to 1992 a research note. American Politics Research, 22(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fieldhouse, E., & Cutts, D. (2012). The companion effect: household and local context and the turnout of young people. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 856–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffin, J. D., & Newman, B. (2005). Are voters better represented? Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1206–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gronke, P., Galanes-Rosenbaum, E., Miller, P. A., & Toffey, D. (2008). Convenience voting. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayes, D., & Mckee, S. C. (2009). The participatory effects of redistricting. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 1006–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Highton, B. (1997). Easy registration and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 59(02), 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Highton, B. (2000). Residential mobility, community mobility, and electoral participation. Political Behavior, 22(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Highton, B. (2009). Revisiting the relationship between educational attainment and political sophistication. The Journal of Politics, 71(04), 1564–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Highton, B., & Wolfinger, R. E. (2001). The first seven years of the political life cycle. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hobbs, W. R., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Widowhood effects in voter participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. International Idea 2015. Voter Turnout Database. I: Idea, I. (ed.). Stockholm: The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).Google Scholar
  37. Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klofstad, C. A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knack, S., & White, J. (2000). Election-day registration and turnout inequality. Political Behavior, 22(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lane, R. E. (1959). Political life: How and why do people get involved in politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (2013). Who votes now?: Demographics, issues, inequality, and turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 19, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindsay, A. D. (1947). The modern democratic state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, P. S. (2003). Voting’s rewards: Voter turnout, attentive publics, and congressional allocation of federal money. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mcnulty, J. E., Dowling, C. M., & Ariotti, M. H. (2009). Driving saints to sin: How increasing the difficulty of voting dissuades even the most motivated voters. Political Analysis, 17(4), 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nickerson, D. W. (2015). Do voter registration drives increase participation? For whom and when? The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Panagopoulos, C. (2013). Extrinsic rewards, intrinsic motivation and voting. The Journal of Politics, 75(01), 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Persson, M. (2014). Social network position mediates the effect of education on active political party membership. Party Politics, 20(5), 724–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(01), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Touchstone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhine, S. L. (1995). Registration reform and turnout change in the American states. American Politics Research, 23(4), 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(01), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  54. Rosenstone, S. J., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1978). The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 72(01), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinclair, B. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smets, K., & Van Ham, C. (2013). The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Squire, P., Wolfinger, R. E., & Glass, D. P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 81(01), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations