Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans: Mine is a Likable Rogue, Yours is a Degenerate Criminal
- First Online:
- 398 Downloads
We fielded an experiment in the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Study testing the theory that motivated reasoning governs reactions to news about misdeeds on the campaign trail. Treated subjects either encountered a fabricated news story involving phone calls with deceptive information about polling times or one involving disappearing yard signs (the offending party was varied at random). Control subjects received no treatment. We then inquired about how the treated subjects felt about dirty tricks in political campaigns and about all subjects’ trust in government. We find that partisans process information about dirty campaign tricks in a motivated way, expressing exceptional concern when the perpetrators are political opponents. However, there is almost no evidence that partisans’ evaluations of dirty political tricks in turn color other political attitudes, such as political trust.
KeywordsElection fraud Dirty tricks Public opinion Experiment Trust Cynicism Universal aversion Motivated reasoning
- Alvarez, M., & Boehmke, F. J. (2008). Correlates of fraud: Studying state election fraud allegations. In M. Alvarez, T. Hall, & S. D. Hyde (Eds.), Election fraud: Detecting and deterring electoral manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Alvarez, M., Hall, Thad, & Hyde, S. D. (2008a). Introduction: Studying election fraud. In M. Alvarez, T. Hall, & S. D. Hyde (Eds.), Election fraud: Detecting and deterring electoral manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Birch, S. (2009). Electoral corruption. In T. Landman & N. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of comparative politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., et al. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In Standard edition (Vol. 22, pp. 3–128). London: Hogart Press.Google Scholar
- Grossmann, M., Sides, J., Lipsitz, K. (n.d.). The Myth of universal aversion: Public opinion about negativity in American Campaigns. http://home.gwu.edu/~jsides/aversion.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2010.
- Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reasoning: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- McCann, J. A., & Dominguez, J. I. (1996). Democratizing Mexico: Public opinion and electoral choice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- McCann, J. A., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). As voters head to the polls, will they perceive a ‘culture of corruption?’. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37, 797–802.Google Scholar
- PEW. (2010). Distrust, discontent, anger and partisan rancor. http://www.people-press.org/2010/04/18/section-1-trust-in-government-1958-2010/. Accessed on October 21 2014.
- Rudolph, T. J. (2006). Triangulating political responsibility: The motivated formation of responsibility judgements. Political Behavior, 27, 99–122.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, F. C. (2007). Lessons learned. In C. F. Schaffer (Ed.), Elections for sale: The causes and consequences of vote buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, F. C. (2008). The hidden costs of clean election reform. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Sherif, M., et al. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
- Taber, C. S., Lodge, M., & Glathar, J. (2001). The motivated construction of political judgements. In J. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar