Do Ballot Initiatives Increase General Political Knowledge?
- 572 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
Current literature often suggests that more information and choices will enhance citizens’ general political knowledge. Notably, some studies indicate that a greater number of state ballot initiatives raise Americans’ knowledge through increases in motivation and supply of political information. By contrast, we contend that political psychology theory and findings indicate that, at best, more ballot measures will have no effect on knowledge. At worst greater use of direct democracy should make it more costly to learn about institutions of representative government and lessen motivation by overwhelming voters with choices. To test this proposition, we develop a new research design and draw upon data more appropriate to assessing the question at hand. We also make use of a propensity score matching algorithm to assess the balance in the data between initiative state and non-initiative state voters. Controlling for a wide variety of variables, we find that there is no empirical relationship between ballot initiatives and political knowledge. These results add to a growing list of findings which cast serious doubt on the educative potential of direct democracy.
Keywords
Ballot initiatives Political awareness Secondary effects of direct democracyNotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions and pushing us to make this paper better. Additionally, we would like to thank Paul Quirk and Kimberly Nalder for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft. The authors alone are responsible for any errors.
References
- Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., Spranca, M. D., & Mark, D. (1994). Psychological determinants of decision attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biggers, L. (2011). When ballot issues matter: social issue ballot measures and their impact on turnout. Political Behavior, 33, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biggers, D. L. (2012). Can a social issue proposition increase political knowledge? Campaign learning and the educative effects of direct democracy. American Politics Research, 40, 998–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blume, L., Müller, J., & Voigt, S. (2009). The economic effects of direct democracy: A first global assessment. Public Choice, 140, 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boehmke, F. J., & Bowen, D. (2010). Direct democracy and individual interest group membership. Journal of Politics, 72, 659–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. S. (2006). The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfare. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(Spring), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1998). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2004). Measuring the effect of direct democracy on state policy: Not all initiatives are created equal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brace, P., Sims-Butler, K., Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2002). Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Branton, R. P. (2003). Examining individual-level voting behavior on state ballot propositions. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, J. E. (1986). Presidential coattails and midterm losses in state legislative elections. The American Political Science Review, 80, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, D. E., & Monson, J. Q. (2008). The religion card. Gay marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 910–922.Google Scholar
- Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37(November), 1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Carsey, T. M., & Wright, G. C. (1998). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42(July), 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chaffee, S. H., & Kanihan, S. F. (1997). Learning about politics from the mass media. Political Communication, 14, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Childers, M., & Binder, M. (2012). Engaged by the initiative? How the use of citizen initiatives increases voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. NewYork: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2008). Direct democracy and good governance: Does it matter? In S. Bowler & A. Glazer (Eds.), Direct democracy’s impact on American political institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Donovan, T., Tolbert, C. J., & Smith, D. A. (2008). Priming presidential votes by direct democracy. Journal of Politics, 70, 1217–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: New evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dyck, Joshua. J. (2009). Initiated distrust: Direct democracy and trust in government. American Politics Research, 37, 539–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dyck, J. J., & Lascher, E. L., Jr. (2009). Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsidered. Political Behavior, 31(September), 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dyck, J. J., & Seabrook, N. R. (2010). Mobilized by direct democracy: Short-term versus long-term effects and the geography of turnout in ballot measure elections. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Freitag, M., & Stadelmann-Stefan, I. (2010). Stumbling block or stepping stone? The influence of direct democracy on individual participation in parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies, 29, 472–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frey, W. H., & Myers, D. (2005). Racial Segregation in US Metropolitan Areas and Cities, 1990–2000: Patterns, trends, and explanations. Population Studies Center Research Report 05-573.Google Scholar
- Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000a). Happiness, economy, and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000b). Happiness prospers in democracy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hero, R. E., & Tolbert, C. J. (1996). A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the US. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 851–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hero, R. E., & Tolbert, C. J. (2004). Minority voices and citizen attitudes about government responsiveness in the American states: Do social and institutional context matter? British Journal of Political Science, 34, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill, K. Q., & Hurley, P. A. (1984). Estimating congressional district political attributes with survey data: A reliability assessment. Political Methodology, 10, 447–464.Google Scholar
- Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jerit, J., Barabas, J., & Bolsen, T. (2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50(April), 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keith, B. E., Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., Orr, E., Westlye, M. C., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., & Rich, R. F. (2001). The political environment and citizen competence. American Journal of Political Science, 45(April), 410–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lac, L. T., & Lascher, E. L, Jr. (2012). The impact of direct democracy on governance: A replication and extension. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 5, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. (2009). How should we estimate public opinion in the states? American Journal of Political Science, 53, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct democracy: new approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 463–482.Google Scholar
- Luskin, R. C. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31(November), 856–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luskin, R. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). Direct democracy works. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mick, D. G., Broniarczyk, S. M., & Haidt, J. (2004). Choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose: Emerging and prospective research on the deleterious effects of living in consumer hyperchoice. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nardulli, P. F. (1990). Political subcultures in the American states: An empirical examination of Elazar’s formulation. American Politics Research, 18, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nicholson, S. P. (2003). The political environment and ballot proposition awareness. American Journal of Political Science, 47(July), 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(July), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008). Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rainey, C. n.d. Arguing for a Negligible Effect. American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming). Retrieved January 23, 2014 from http://www.carlislerainey.com/files/nme.pdf.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schlozman, Daniel., & Yohai, Ian. (2008). How initiatives don’t always make citizens: Ballot initiatives in the American states, 1978–2004. Political Behavior, 30(December), 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Selb, P. (2008). Supersized votes: Ballot length, uncertainty, and choice in direct legislation elections. Public Choice, 135, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharkansky, I. (1969). The utility of Elazar’s political culture: A research note. Polity, 2, 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, M. A. (2002). Ballot initiatives and the democratic citizen. Journal of Politics, 64, 892–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, D. A., & Tolbert, C. J. (2004). Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Tolbert, C. J., & Smith, D. A. (2005). The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout. American Politics Research, 33(2), 283–309.Google Scholar
- Weaver, D. H. (1996). What voters learn from media. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(July), 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar