Do Ballot Initiatives Increase General Political Knowledge?
- 530 Downloads
Current literature often suggests that more information and choices will enhance citizens’ general political knowledge. Notably, some studies indicate that a greater number of state ballot initiatives raise Americans’ knowledge through increases in motivation and supply of political information. By contrast, we contend that political psychology theory and findings indicate that, at best, more ballot measures will have no effect on knowledge. At worst greater use of direct democracy should make it more costly to learn about institutions of representative government and lessen motivation by overwhelming voters with choices. To test this proposition, we develop a new research design and draw upon data more appropriate to assessing the question at hand. We also make use of a propensity score matching algorithm to assess the balance in the data between initiative state and non-initiative state voters. Controlling for a wide variety of variables, we find that there is no empirical relationship between ballot initiatives and political knowledge. These results add to a growing list of findings which cast serious doubt on the educative potential of direct democracy.
KeywordsBallot initiatives Political awareness Secondary effects of direct democracy
- Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1998). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, D. E., & Monson, J. Q. (2008). The religion card. Gay marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 910–922.Google Scholar
- Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. NewYork: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2008). Direct democracy and good governance: Does it matter? In S. Bowler & A. Glazer (Eds.), Direct democracy’s impact on American political institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Frey, W. H., & Myers, D. (2005). Racial Segregation in US Metropolitan Areas and Cities, 1990–2000: Patterns, trends, and explanations. Population Studies Center Research Report 05-573.Google Scholar
- Hill, K. Q., & Hurley, P. A. (1984). Estimating congressional district political attributes with survey data: A reliability assessment. Political Methodology, 10, 447–464.Google Scholar
- Keith, B. E., Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., Orr, E., Westlye, M. C., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct democracy: new approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 463–482.Google Scholar
- Rainey, C. n.d. Arguing for a Negligible Effect. American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming). Retrieved January 23, 2014 from http://www.carlislerainey.com/files/nme.pdf.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. A., & Tolbert, C. J. (2004). Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Tolbert, C. J., & Smith, D. A. (2005). The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout. American Politics Research, 33(2), 283–309.Google Scholar