Political Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 253–278 | Cite as

Ideological Labels in America

  • Christopher ClaassenEmail author
  • Patrick Tucker
  • Steven S. Smith
Original Paper


This paper extends Ellis and Stimson’s (Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2012) study of the operational-symbolic paradox using issue-level measures of ideological incongruence based on respondent positions and symbolic labels for these positions across 14 issues. Like Ellis and Stimson, we find that substantial numbers—over 30 %—of Americans experience conflicted conservatism. Our issue-level data reveal, furthermore, that conflicted conservatism is most common on the issues of education and welfare spending. In addition, we also find that 20 % of Americans exhibit conflicted liberalism. We then replicate Ellis and Stimson’s finding that conflicted conservatism is associated with low sophistication and religiosity, but also find that it is associated with being socialized in a post-1960s generation and using Fox News as a main news source. Finally, we show the important role played by identities, with both conflicted conservatism and conflicted liberalism linked with partisan and ideological identities, and conflicted liberalism additionally associated with ethnic identities.


Operational ideology Symbolic ideology Identity 

Supplementary material

11109_2014_9272_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (88 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 88 kb)


  1. Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1055–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers: values, information, and American public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baldassarri, D., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Neither ideologues, nor agnostics: Alternative Voters’ belief system in an age of partisan politics. American Journal of Sociology (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, K. M., & Walter, O. (1989). A group theory of religion and politics. Political Research Quarterly, 42, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best, S. J., Chmielewski, B., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Selective exposure to online foreign news during the conflict with Iraq. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Knight, K., & Sigelman, L. (1998). The interplay of partisanship and ideology: A time-series analysis. Journal of Politics, 60(4), 1044–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Cantril, A. H., & Cantril, S. D. (1999). Reading mixed signals: Ambivalence in American public opinion about Government. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clawson, R. A., & Trice, R. (2000). Poverty as we know it: Media portrayals of the Poor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conover, P. J. (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. The Journal of Politics, 46(3), 760–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meanings of liberal/conservative self-identification. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Pater (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Delli-Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2007). Pathways to Ideology in American Politics: The Operational-Symbolic Paradox Revisited. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2012). Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2013). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  19. Feldman, S., & Steenbergen, M. (2001). Public welfare attitudes and the humanitarian sensibility. In J. Kuklinski (Ed.), Political psychology and public opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Free, L. A., & Cantril, H. (1967). The political beliefs of Americans. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gilens, M. (2000). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of anti-poverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goren, P. (2004). Political sophistication and policy reasoning: A reconsideration. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 462–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacoby, W. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jennings, M. K. (1992). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Judd, C., & Krosnick, J. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Kellstedt, L., & Smidt, C. (1991). Measuring fundamentalism: An analysis of different operational strategies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knight, K. (1985). Ideology in the 1980 Election: Ideological sophistication does matter. Journal of Politics, 47, 828–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. (2002). Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leege, D. C., & Kellstedt, L. A. (1993). Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, A. S. (1992). Are self-proclaimed conservatives really conservative? Trends in attitudes and self-identification among the young. Social Forces, 71, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, A. H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G., & Malanchuk, O. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. The American Political Science Review, 95, 97–114.Google Scholar
  40. Popp, E., & Rudolph, T. J. (2011). A tale of two ideologies: Explaining public support for economic interventions. The Journal of Politics, 73, 808–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites Us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  42. Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., & Grant, A. E. (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, J. P., & Fleishman, J. A. (1984). Trends in ideological identification in the American public. Annals of Political and Social Science, 472, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, J. P., & Fleishman, J. A. (1988). Ideological identification: Trends and interpretations of the liberal-conservative balance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schiffer, A. J. (2000). I’m not that liberal: Explaining conservative democratic identification. Political Behavior, 22, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sears, D. O., & Citrin, J. (1985). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1990). Self-interest in Americans’ political opinions. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 147–170). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Shafer, B. E., & Claggett, W. J. (1995). The two majorities: The issue context of modern American politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, T. W. (1990). Liberal and conservative trends in the United States since world war II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sniderman, P. M., & Stigliz, E. H. (2012). The reputational premium: A theory of party identification and reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stimson, J. A. (1975). Belief systems: Constraint, complexity, and the 1972 Election. American Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Treier, S., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  60. Wittkopf, E. R. (1990). Faces of internationalism: Public opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zschirnt, S. (2011). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications revisited. Political Behavior, 33, 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zumbrunnen, J., & Gangl, A. (2008). Conflict, fusion, or coexistence? The complexity of contemporary American conservatism. Political Behavior, 30, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Claassen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrick Tucker
    • 2
  • Steven S. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentUniversity of EssexColchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of Political Science and the Weidenbaum CenterWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations