Adams, J., Merrill, S, I. I. I., Simas, E., & Stone, W. J. (2011). When candidates value good character: A spatial model with applications to congressional elections. Journal of Politics,
Alexander, D., & Anderson, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly,
Anzia, S. F., & Berry, C. R. (2011). The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson effect: Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? American Journal of Political Science,
Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996. American Journal of Political Science,
Basinger, S. J., & Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice. American Political Science Review,
Black, J. H., & Erickson, L. (2000). Similarity, compensation or difference? A comparison of female and male office-seekers. Women and Politics,
Black, J. H., & Erickson, L. (2003). Women candidates and voter bias: Do women politicians need to be better? Electoral Studies,
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis,
Burrell, B. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bystrom, D. G., Banwart, M. C., Kaid, L. L., & Robertson, T. A. (2004). Gender and candidate communication: Videostyle, webstyle, newsstyle. New York: Routledge.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
Center for American Women in Politics. (2012). Historical information about women in Congress. Retrieved June 30, 2013 from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/Congress-HistoricalInfo.php.
Cook, E. A. (1994). Voter responses to women Senate candidates. In E. A. Cook, S. Thomas, & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The year of the woman: Myths and realities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Crowder-Meyer, M. (2011). Candidate recruitment and party networks: How the beliefs and behavior of local party leaders affect women’s representation. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, 2011.
Darcy, R., & Schramm, S. S. (1977). When women run against men. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Darcy, R., Welch, S., & Clark, J. (1994). Women, elections and representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Dolan, K. A. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Dolan, K. A. (2008). Is there a ‘gender affinity effect’ in American politics? Information, affect and candidate sex in U.S. House elections. Political Research Quarterly,
Dolan, K. A. (2010). The impact of gender stereotyped evaluations on support for women candidates. Political Behavior,
Dolan, K. A., & Sanbonmatsu, K. (2009). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward gender balance in government. American Politics Research,
Duerst-Lahti, G. (1998). The bottleneck: Women becoming candidates. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eagly, A. H. (2004). Prejudice: Toward a more inclusive understanding. In A. H. Eagly, R. M. Baron, & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review,
Ekstrand, L. E., & Eckert, W. A. (1981). The impact of candidate’s sex on voter choice. Western Political Quarterly,
Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Fulton, S. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly,
Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., Maisel, L. S., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender, ambition and the decision to run for Congress. Political Research Quarterly,
Fulton, S. A., & Ondercin, H. L. (2012). Does sex encourage commitment? The impact of candidate choices on the time-to-decision. Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9214-0.
Groseclose, T. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science,
Hedlund, R. D., Freedman, P. K., Hamm, K. E., & Stein, R. M. (1979). The electability of women candidates: The effects of sex role stereotypes. Journal of Politics,
Herrnson, P. S., Lay, J. C., & Stokes, A. K. (2003). Women running ‘as women’: Candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter-targeting strategies. Journal of Politics,
Herrnson, P. S., & Lucas, J. C. (2006). The fairer sex? Gender and negative campaigning in U.S. elections. American Politics Research,
Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993a). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science,
Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993b). The consequences of gender stereotypes of women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly,
Kahn, K. F. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of U.S. Senate candidates. Journal of Politics,
Kahn, K. F. (1994). Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns. American Journal of Political Science,
Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequence of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kam, C. D. (2007). Implicit attitudes, explicit choices: When subliminal priming predicts candidate preference. Political Behavior,
Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J, Jr. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review,
King, D. C., & Matland, R. E. (2003). Sex and the grand old party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research,
Koch, J. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations? Journal of Politics,
Koch, J. W. (2002). Gender stereotypes and citizens’ impressions of House candidates’ ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science,
Krasno, J. S., & Green, D. P. (1988). Preempting quality challengers in House elections. Journal of Politics,
Lawless, J. L., & Pearson, K. (2008). The primary reason for women’s underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. Journal of Politics,
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review,
Matland, R. E., & King, D. C. (2002). Women as candidates in congressional elections. In C. S. Rosenthal (Ed.), Women transforming Congress. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
McCurley, C., & Mondak, J. J. (1995). Inspected by #1184063113: The influence of incumbents’ competence and integrity in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science,
McDermott, M. L. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science,
McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly,
Milyo, J., & Schosberg, S. (2000). Gender bias and selection bias in House elections. Public Choice,
Mondak, J. J. (1995). Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics,
Niven, D. (1998). The missing majority: The recruitment of women as state legislative candidates. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Ondercin, H. L. (2011). The changing meaning of being a man or a woman: The social definition of gender. Paper presented to the Southern Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting.
Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2006). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Paolino, P. (1995). Group-salient issues and group representation: Support for women candidates in the 1992 Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science,
Plutzer, E., & Zipp, J. F. (1996). Identity politics, partisanship and voting for women candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information-processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science,
Rosenthal, C. S. (1998). When women lead. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote-choice. American Journal of Political Science,
Sanbonmatsu, K., & Dolan, K. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Research Quarterly,
Seltzer, R., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. elections. Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner.
Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review,
Stokes, D. E. (1992). Valence politics. In D. Kavanaugh (Ed.), Electoral politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stone, W. J., Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., & Maisel, L. S. (2010). Incumbency reconsidered: Prospects, strategic entry and incumbent quality in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics,
Stone, W. J., Maisel, L. S., & Maestas, C. D. (2003). Quality counts: Extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence. American Journal of Political Science,
Stone, W. J., & Simas, E. N. (2010). Candidate valence and ideological positions in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science,
Swers, M. L. (1998). Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Swers, M. L. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science,
Welch, S. (1985). Are women more liberal than men in the U.S. Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Wolbrecht, C. (2002). Female legislators and the women’s rights agenda: From feminine mystique to feminist era. In C. S. Rosenthal (Ed.), Women transforming Congress. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.