Getting Personal? The Impact of Social Media on Preferential Voting
Ever since the successful presidential campaign of Barack Obama in 2008, attention has been drawn to the political impact of social media. However, it remains to be seen whether the successful Obama campaign is the exception or the rule. Our research focuses specifically on the impact of social media on preference voting. First it seeks to establish whether candidates make use of social media during election campaigns and whether voters in turn follow politicians. Afterwards it examines to what extent social media make a difference and yield a preference vote bonus. Theoretically, two types of effects are outlined, namely a direct effect of the number of followers a candidate has and a statistical interaction effect whereby a higher number of followers only yields more votes when the candidate actively uses the social media. To carry out our analysis, we make use of a unique dataset that combines data on social media usage and data on the candidates themselves (such as position on the list, being wellknown, exposure to the old media, gender, ethnicity and incumbency). The dataset includes information on all 493 candidates of the 10 parties that received at least one seat in the Dutch 2010 election. It turns out that candidates are eager to use social media, but that relatively few people follow candidates. There is a significant interaction effect of social media usage and the number of followers, but that effect appears to be relatively small.
KeywordsSocial media Preference voting Voting behavior Political parties Political Communication Twitter
- Andeweg, R. B., & Irwin, G. (2005). Governance and politics of the Netherlands (2nd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Colomer, J. M. (2011). Introduction: personal and party representation. In J. M. Colomer (Ed.), Personal representation. The neglected dimension of electoral systems (pp. 1–20). Colchester: ECPR.Google Scholar
- Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2012, April). A net gain? Web 2.0 campaigning in the Australian 2010 election. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Antwerp, Belgium 10–15.Google Scholar
- Hoff, J. (2010). Election campaigns on the internet: how are voters affected? International Journal of E-Politics, 1(1), 22–40.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, K., & Leyenaar, M. (2011). A conceptual framework for major, minor and technical electoral reform. West European Politics, 34(3), 495–513.Google Scholar
- Oosterveer, D. (2011). Facebook nog niet groter dan Hyves in Nederland. http://www.marketingfacts.nl/berichten/20110720_facebook_nog_niet_groter_dan_hyves_in_nederland. Accessed 12 March 2012.
- Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.Google Scholar
- Smits, F., & Spierings, N. (2012). Sociale integratie en het kijken naar nieuwsprogramma’s als determinanten voor het Wisselen van politieke partijkeuze in de periode 1994–2006. Mens en Maatschappij, 87(2), 150–173.Google Scholar
- Swigger, N. (2012). The Online Citizen: Is Social Media Changing Citizens’ Beliefs about Democratic Values? Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9208-y.
- Thijssen, P., & Jacobs, K. (2004). Determinanten van voorkeurstemproporties bij (Sub-)lokale Verkiezingen. De Antwerpse Districtsraadsverkiezingen van 8 Oktober 2000. Res Publica, 46(4), 460–485.Google Scholar
- Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning. The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068811407580.
- Wilson, J. (2009, February 25). Not another political Zombie. New Mathilda Online. Retreived October 5, 2012, from http://newmatilda.com/2009/02/25/not-another-political-zombie.