Political Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 665–686 | Cite as

Does Sex Encourage Commitment? The Impact of Candidate Choices on the Time-to-Decision

Original Paper

Abstract

The sex of a congressional candidate can influence voting choices, but does candidate sex also influence the timing of those choices? This paper examines that question in light of other information that voters weigh in making their decisions. Using a national survey from the 2006 election, and a unique dataset of political informants, we find that the sex of the candidate conveys ideological information that permits voters to make swifter judgments. Additionally, it reduces the probability of a delayed decision by supplying information helpful to the choice between candidates—even in the absence of ideology. In fact, the impact of candidate sex rivals other variables that are traditionally used to explain the time-to-decision. Consistent with the literature on sex stereotypes, we find a stronger influence for Democratic than Republican female candidates.

Keywords

Late-deciders Candidate sex Sex stereotypes Voting behavior Heuristics Time-to-decision Women in politics 

Supplementary material

11109_2012_9214_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 60 kb)

References

  1. Alexander, D., & Anderson, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 527–545.Google Scholar
  2. Barone, M., & Cohen, R. E. (Eds.). (2006). The almanac of American politics. Washington, DC: National Journal Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barone, M., & Cohen, R. E. (Eds.). (2008). The almanac of American politics. Washington, DC: National Journal Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M. & Kimball, D. (1999). The timing of voting decisions in presidential campaigns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burden, B. C. (2004). Candidate positioning in U.S. congressional elections. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Center for American Women Politics (CAWP). (2010). Summary of women candidates for selected offices 1870–2010. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/documents/can_histsum.pdf. Last Accessed 10/8/2012.
  10. Chaffee, S. H., & Choe, S. Y. (1980). Time of decision and media use during the Ford-Carter campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaffee, S., & Rimal, R. N. (1996). Time of vote decision and openness to persuasion. In D. Mutz, P. Sniderman & R. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 267–291). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 912–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dolan, K. (1997). Gender differences in support for women candidates: Is there a glass ceiling American politics? Women & Politics, 17(2), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan, K. (2004a). The impact of candidate sex on evaluations of candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolan, K. (2004b). Voting for women. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  17. Dolan, K., & Sanbonmatsu, K. (2009). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward gender balance in government. American Politics Research, 37(3), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  19. Fournier, P., Nadeau, R., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2004). Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects. Electoral Studies, 23(4), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fulton, S. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly, 65(2), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., Maisel, L. S., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender, ambition and the decision to run for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gertzog, I. N. (2002). Women’s changing pathways to the U.S. House of Representatives: Widows, elites and strategic politicians. In C. S. Rosenthal (Ed.), Women transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gopoian, J. D., & Hadjiharalambous, S. (1994). Late-deciding voters in presidential elections. Political Behavior, 16(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groseclose, T. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayes, D. (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 908–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, B. C., & McAllister, I. (1996). Marketing politics to voters: Late deciders in the 1992 British election. European Journal of Marketing, 30(10/11), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Irwin, G. A., & Van Holsteyn, J. J. M. (2008). What are they waiting for? Strategic information for late deciding voters. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(4), 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahn, K. F. (1994). Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 162–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Koch, J. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations? Journal of Politics, 62(2), 414–429.Google Scholar
  33. Koch, J. W. (2002). Gender stereotypes and citizens’ impressions of House candidates’ ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Norpoth, H., Jacoby, W. G., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluations. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDermott, M. L. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918.Google Scholar
  38. Mondak, J. J. (1995). Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics, 57(4), 1043–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nir, L., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Campaign mixed-message flows and timing of the vote decision. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 326–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rahn, W. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanbonmatsu, K., & Dolan, K. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2011). The interplay of party and gender stereotypes in evaluating political candidates. Manuscript presented to the New Research on Gender and Political Psychology Conference, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  46. Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stokes, D. E. (1992). Valence politics. In E. Kavanaugh (Ed.), Electoral Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stokes, D. E., & Miller, W. E. (1966). Party government and the saliency of Congress. A. Campbell et al. (Ed.), Elections and political order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Stone, W. J., & Simas, E. N. (2010). Candidate valence and ideological positions in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1051–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whitney, D. C., & Goldman, S. B. (1985). Media use and time of vote decision: A study of the 1980 presidential election. Communication Research, 12(4), 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright, J. R., & Nemi, R. G. (1983). Perceptions of candidates’ issue positions. Political Behavior, 5(2), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Political Science DepartmentUniversity of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations